Hmmm...from Google AI:
The Trump administration did not provide conclusive evidence that Iran was violating the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) prior to the U.S. withdrawal in May 2018. Reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) indicated that Iran was complying with the nuclear limits set by the JCPOA until that point.

"Blameless in what 238 deaths in Iranian attack on peacekeeping Marine and french soldiers in Lebanon?"

On the contrary, culpable. It's why I've had no qualms about condemning Iran. Even today, they're a schhittty oppressive backwater, save for the bubblin' crude.

"What is the US to be blamed for, exactly that wasn't in response to Iranian provocations"

Wait. Has the US shown proof the Iranians violated the JCPOA? If so, I apologize; I was unaware.

"what is something you condemn Iran of doing?"

I've certainly condemned Iran at every evil turn.

Meanwhile...while in the Navy, what was the longest you were out of port?

And, if I may...where were you furthest from your home port?

"Why don't you post with the same level of hatred against other countries that you do against America?"

Why are you lying, Bill? I LOVE America.

In America, my wife and I could bring in $600,000 of income next year, and only pay $250 in income taxes. I can't do that in any other country!

But like everything loved, we want it/them to be perfect. Tearing up Obama's Iran deal, because of the name on it, will go down as one of the dumbest strategic moves in history. Negotiators were giddy about getting, for the first time, monitors on the SUPPLY CHAINS. Dumb Donnie ended all that.

There is no way in heaven, hell, or anywhere in-between Trump is going to end up with deal anywhere near Obama's.

And that's what gets your gall.

"How many of the liberals out there are actually on Iran's side?"

None.

That doesn't mean they have to pretend America's been blameless.

Clearly, it does to you.

"You ------- are losers."

What a riot. You can't even identify a LOSS, or applaud a PROFIT.

Hack-tastic!

"Are you a money moron?"

I'm going to have to conclude YES, unless you mention every time Biden "drained" the SPR, he made a profit on the refill.

Unlike Trump, who, if he refills the SPR, will do it for a loss.

And you? You'll slurp it all up.

"Refilling it for an imbecile who drained it to sway midterm elections?!"

No, refilling it at a lower price than the sale. That's called a PROFIT.

Are you a money moron?

" I'm paying less than I paid 3 years ago."

Nice cherry-pick, during the brutal times!

"Now, that's pennies, but still less..."

Thanks for proving my point: In the brutal times, it was, basically...this.

Back to the cherry orchard...now go two months forward from three years ago. What were you paying?

Oops.

" I didn't hear Biden apologize for draining the SPR or for the prices on fuel."

"Why would he apologize?"

Not refilling the SPR before going to war??? If you weren't such a hack, you call Trump a raetard.

"Gas isn't any higher now than it was under Biden"

Yeah.

That was a BRUTAL two weeks. Positively brutal.

"My original question at the beginning was "what is something you condemn Iran of doing?"

What a riot, coming from someone who won't condemn America for ANYTHING, regardless.

Bomb a girls school? FINE! Cover for Pedophiles? AGREED! Obliterate a country's leaders? THUMBS UP!

Take responsibility? NOT ON YOUR LIFE!

"The indictment accuses the defendants of coordinating encrypted Signal chats and rapid-response networks, tracking immigration officers, organizing blockades around the Whipple Federal Building and raising money to support those efforts."

Unless the blockades were illegal, I see nothing that doesn't adhere to the First Amendment rights of Speech and Assembly.

" Prosecutors say the case is based on the defendants' alleged actions, not their political views."

Which is completely opposite of what actually happened.

" calling it a "war of choice" pretends Iran had no role in bringing us here."

Who ordered the bombing of Iran's leadership while they were meeting to agree on a response to the US?!?

"who illegally sought to impede ICE"

This, from the group who sued a performer for Breach of Contract, without ever seeing the contract ...

... because IT DIDN'T EXIST.

And in this case, if there was a specific charge, the government, and the author, would've included it.

" who illegally sought to impede ICE during Operation Metro Surge."

With no specific charge mentioned.

Quelle suprise!

" No one is coming for you, and you absolutely know this."

Only a moron would find out the government is creating dossiers on people who peaceably assemble, and then claim the government ISN'T coming for you.

"First they came for ... "