Since the U.S. Supreme Court opened the door to legalized gambling in 2018, and most states permitted people to wager on their phones, gambling scandals, once rare in sports, have become a new American pastime. And prop bets have proved particularly ripe for manipulation. read more
As the price of Trump's ginormous ballroom continues to rise, questions remain about how it will be funded. read more
A newly released study questions established beliefs about how urban civilization first emerged in ancient Mesopotamia, proposing that Sumer's development resulted from the complex interaction of rivers, tides, and sediment deposits at the northern edge of the Persian Gulf. The study presents a new paleoenvironmental model proposing that tidal forces shaped the earliest stages of Sumerian agriculture and the rise of complex societies. read more
A cryptocurrency promoted in January by US first lady Melania Trump was part of a sophisticated fraud that "leveraged celebrity association and borrowed fame' to sell legitimacy to unsuspecting investors," a new legal filing has alleged. read more
Trump has demanded that the Department of Justice pay him a whopping $230 million in compensation for its criminal investigations of him after his first term in the White House ended, The New York Times reported Tuesday. The Times noted that any potential settlement might have to be approved by people he has appointed during his second term. One of them, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, previously represented Trump as a defense attorney in criminal cases against the president. read more
Something of a nervous nutter who sounds like he never quite shook off graduate school (see en.wikipedia.org).
There is nothing inherently wrong with any of that, by the way.
But it may help provide a bit of perspective.
Here you go: JJ Methvin, Andele, The Mexican-Kiowa Captive: A Story of Real Life Among the Indians www.amazon.com
"If I were a commander today, I would not sign an NDA like the one reportedly being circulated in the Southern Command theater. Not out of defiance, but out of respect for the oath I took to support and defend the Constitution. I would continue to safeguard classified information with the same care I always did"but I would not allow a redundant or politically motivated document to interfere with lawful communication between the armed forces, civilian leaders, and the representatives of the people. Refusing to sign wouldn't be disobedience; it would be fidelity to both law and principle."
Mark Hertling
"Why Commanders Don't Sign NDAs"
www.thebulwark.com
One more time: Soldiers don't serve individuals; they serve the Constitution. They don't conceal truth from oversight; they protect truth from exploitation. There's a difference between secrecy that saves lives and secrecy that is based on misplaced loyalty. Our system is designed to tell those apart.
I understand why businesses need NDAs, but NDAs have no place in our government. They belong in corporate boardrooms, not command tents. They substitute legal fear for professional trust, and in doing so they erode the very foundation on which military leadership stands.
Because, in the end, this isn't about secrecy at all"it's about trust. Trust in the laws that already govern classified information. Trust in the officers and NCOs who have spent their careers safeguarding it. Trust in the system of checks and balances that keeps our military strong, apolitical, and accountable. Once that trust is broken"once leaders use the tools of secrecy to silence rather than to secure"it cannot be restored by any number of signatures on a form.
Pertinent, I think: