#1

They can. It requires a complaint and time.

Posted by Gal_Tuesday

I hardily disagree with your link. The markings exhibited are embossed. Real ammunition would be engraved in that place prior to installation of the cap (the part that makes it go boom).

#69

Just ignored the radicalized and white supremacist parts of the article.

We have assassinations because the FBI was trained to only look for right wing people ...

#8

#3

Posted by BellRinger

... crazies owning guns.

The industry has said the Buffoon is full of s**t.

Anything new?

This is what you get when you hire a lawyer instead of a doctor.

An advocate instead of a medical professional.

Buffoonism at its finest.

Dumbf**k doesn't have a clue about what government does and does't do.

Some Activities That Are Not Regulated by the FCC. We license individual stations only. We do not license TV or radio networks (such as CBS, NBC, ABC, Fox, etc.), except as owners of particular stations. (emphasis original)

Notwithstanding the Supreme Court's rulings on First Amendment protections, the Court has never held that American Flag desecration conducted in a manner that is likely to incite imminent lawless action or that is an action amounting to "fighting words" is constitutionally protected. See Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 408-10 (1989).

How to say I don't understand prohibited content/view point regulations without using those words.

It takes some real dumb a**es to come up with the "what abouts" thrown out so far. Apparently, the idiots can't discern the difference between pooling resources for a common goal and mandating unconstitutional racial and ethic requirements to participate in the common goal.

#65 It's not a book, it's a 35 page law review article.

It's not just his personal opinion ...

No it's Burger's personal opinion set out in a media interview not a legal argument or document. As for the Politico article it's just a regurgitation of mainstream journalism about the Second Amendment that's refuted by what the Founders actually did with the Militia Acts and the History of the Second Amendment linked at 60.

#53 Revisionist history that I think was first posited by a journalist, I think Thomas Hartman.

#16 Chief Justice Warren Burger's personal opinion, again trotted out. It was expressed in a media interview some 4 years after he retired following a legal career of about 55 years during which he never wrote a legal memorandum, scholarly legal article or a judicial opinion on the Second Amendment.

You stick with the Chief Justice's personal opinion. I'll stick with what the Founders actually did when drafting legislation.

#10 AI overview:

Well-regulated militia" in the context of the Second Amendment refers to a well-organized, disciplined, and capable body of armed citizens, not simply a group of individuals with guns. It emphasizes the importance of a structured and effective militia for the security of a free state, rather than individual gun ownership for personal reasons.

The elephant in the room regarding that theorem is what the founding era legislators actually did regarding what AI posits.

The quarters she was in was for COMMANDERS, which she wasnt anymore.

Noem is not a commander. She ain't even military.