Feel free to explain rather then deflect or accuse.

#15 | Posted by oneironaut

Nobody is under any obligation to address your logical fallacy you stupid pile of S(*&.

-gravy train status: derailed. Leftist propaganda funding: ended.

#3 | Posted by easy_meat

Anybody who thinks PBS is "duhhhh PrOpAgNdA!!" is a worthless pile of s*&^ who shouldn't be speaking.

'Is becomming" LOL - When have you been during the biden years???

#27 | Posted by MSgt

LOL this s*&^heap supports the most corrupt, brazenly unAmerican administration of our lifetimes and still has nothing but "duhhhhhhh BiDeN" as a response.

Eat s*&^, dumbf(*&. If I have to fund your retirement you could at least STFU and not project what a waste of money that is.

I can't enumerate one thing where Lumpers were conservative about anything morally or ethically.

#5 | Posted by oneironaut

Why would a liberal think conservative = moral and ethical?

Oh...right...

STFU idiot.

I'm disgusted that it's that high.

#2 | Posted by DarkVader

I've stopped being surprised that MAGA will go along with anything so long as they think it's making other people as miserable as they are.

That's basically the only metric they're using these days when deciding whether to support something or not.

Do I look like lfthndcuck?

It is strange, you constantly claim to be a liberal but carry water like a MAGA moron.

STFU idiot, nobody cares what you think.

BTW s*&^bag, maybe you could provide an actual link to that. All I can find is an anonymous X post claiming as much. Thanks.

Duh. For as long as I can remember, the GOP has favored passive income over labor under the guise of "incentivizing investment and innovation."

Just another example of how the finance bruhs are killing this country.

And I'm saying if forced institutionalization was the way to stop it, would you be for it?

#25 | Posted by Bluewaffles

Wait. So now y'all are all good with red flag laws?

What saddens me about this, is not that Taco is never brought to justice for these blatant scams, but rather that the idjuts keep falling for it over and over.

Sadly, that doesn't surprise me.

What saddens me about it is that they're allowed to vote and that their vote counts as much as mine.

Dems do love their criminals. Hope they keep up this type of behavior all the way up to 2028, as you know that will attract rational voters to the dems - Right?......

#6 | Posted by MSgt

STFU you f*&^ing idiot.

It's about not eviscerating the constitution. Do you remember what that is, "msgt"? You supposedly took an oath to it, remember?

Probably not you stupid f*&^.

Those people weren't even elected.

#3 | Posted by oneironaut

Duhhhhhhh I'm uHHHhhh IdIoTz!!

STFU idiot.

The idea of letting them run unchecked through the cities is terrible for the poor that live there.

#4 | Posted by oneironaut

STFU you ---- idiot.

But if it wasn't clear then, it is now: The White House's public safety play is a deliberate ploy to refocus the narrative on an issue that favors Republicans ahead of the midterms -- one that's already backing Democrats into a corner.

EPSTEIN WAS THE DISTRACTION!

And this isn't an election ploy, it's a consolidation of power ploy.

Jesus Christ the media is f*&^ing stupid and obtuse.

Remember when Trump not getting us engaged in foreign conflicts was a big to do?

Trumper morons couldn't stop yapping about it.

Now those same idiots will be along cheering this as a "finally!" moment as they, yet again, discard a supposedly closely held belief/value as soon as they're told to by Dear Leader.

Probably resistance from the common citizen.

They know it's garbage.

They know what's happening is garbage.

So they refuse to play along.

Expect grand juries to be a thing of the past soon. Kangaroo courts were inevitable anyway...

Because I'm sure these guys and gals don't have lives they'd rather be attending to...

My guess is it will be something that has already been found to be a non-factor but will, coincidentally, have a "treatment" that is already available through RFK and his buddy's snake oil shops.

The new Royalty will not be burdened by the opinions of the serfs.

What did I tell you? Next step was to begin controlling the movement of people into and out and around DC. Taking over the largest mass transit hub in the city is the first step to doing so.

Proof it has nothing to do with crime? This is the best they could come up with for justification:

Vance, a former senator, had complained about an incident where someone yelled at his son while walking through Union Station a couple of years ago. But with the arrival of National Guard troops, he said the station was safe for parents to bring their children.

Claims to be for keeping the peace in DC.

But with provisions to be deployed anywhere in the country where "unrest" is happening.

The next step in this slow creep is they'll "deploy" to one city based on "unrest" that Trump claims is happening and will never leave. Next step then is to simply broaden the EO to create these "forces" in each city Trump says needs one.

Thanks MAGA.

#28 | Posted by sitzkrieg

But like a horseshoe, they're close but not the same. It's not a circle.

You guys like to deflect when presented with your failure.
Since the country is moving more conservative, where are you planning to leave to?

#12 | Posted by boaz

No, you're just a ---- mooching idiot, boaz.

Stuck on duhhhhh LiBrUlz while the people you voted for are destroying our country.

Congrats, dumbf*&^.

#4 | Posted by oneironaut

Nobody cares, wonton.

That's not socialism, dumbf(*&.

Just f(*& off and find some windows to lick, idiot.