Didn't yall vote for him because he wasn't going to get us involved in foreign conflicts?

Now he's starting them and yall are like "duhhhhhh MAgA!!!"

I love it how it's the "constitutional conservative patriots" (many vets) who are obtuse to the blatantly anti-American nature of the actions we're seeing.

Makes you wonder how long it took them to convince themselves they were actually serving their country and not themselves.

Facts not in evidence."

Explain please.

#31 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

No names, badges, warrants, identifiers ...

The best we have is cheap plate carriers with Amazon Velcro generic "police" badges.

There's countless examples of people imitating them because there is no formal identification.

They are Federal Agents. That would be a charge at the federal level.

#24 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Facts not in evidence.

"Find one" approach.

Stupid phone.

They are Federal Officers. I suppose you could accuse individuals at the city or state level, but it would not be as effective as doing it at the Federal level.

#8 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Are they? Given they refuse to identify themselves, we don't actually know.

As for what charge, I'm all for the "fine one" approach in this situation. Anyone anonymously abusing citizens and violating the constitution are owed no deference or protection.

Sad the supposed "constitutional conservatives" are the ones who need to be told this.

So called "Chreestian Conservatives" - *shrug*

You guys are.

You're just not getting it.

Hopeless.

#45 | Posted by BillJohnson

Probably because your "argument" is as solid as your argument against mail in ballots.

You just want it to be cuz meh.

Boaz is such a stupid piece of s*&^.

That's nothing more than a ridiculous strawman you've likely heard somewhere but haven't actually thought about.

#14 | Posted by jpw

Nothing says "you're right" louder than a passive aggressive FF.

I'm not the one cherry picking.
Its the people saying MAGA isn't "Christian" enough, so long as they get to cherry pick what parts of Christianity they approve of.

#34 | Posted by BillJohnson

If you think MAGA is actually following the teachings of Christ...well...

You're not a real Christian. Sorry, but that's the truth.

My point was how some people have undermined their own criticisms because they're demonstrably partisan.

That's nothing more than a ridiculous strawman you've likely heard somewhere but haven't actually thought about.

How cute. They think there will be valid elections ...

The sheer hypocrisy of this article is using scripture against Christians as a weapon, who are themselves not allowed to openly use scripture to defend their beliefs.
#21 | Posted by BillJohnson

Here's an idea, keep your beliefs to yourself and live YOUR life by them and leave it out of your public interactions or political ideals/decision.

That way, nobody can see what a cherry picking fake Chreestian you are and point out scripture you conveniently ignore.

it also gets rid of the gerrymandering Dems have done ever since the Act was passed by ensuring they can redraw lines that gets them more votes.

LOL what an idiot. 'Gets rig of Dem gerrymandering where they do the definition of gerrymandering.'

Hey moron, gerrymandering doesn't get you "more votes," it maximizes the seat holdings per a given number of votes. That's why you can look at the severity of a state's gerrymandering by looking at the % of votes to each party compared to the proportion of a state's legislature or Congression district holdings by party. Or the results of statewide elections (governor or senate) compared to the legislature or US House results.

I agree with this, if coupled with no Gerrymandering. Just draw squares with the required population and let the chis fall where they may.

#2 | Posted by TFDNihilist

Correct.

That won't happen though as this is little more than a powerplay to ensure single party dominance independently of any actual policy ideas or quality of governance.

Those of you who cheered on the Clinton admin's use of the predecessor of ICE during the Elian Gonzales incident didn't think about how it could be abused in the future. Just like those who are cheering on what they're doing now aren't either. Of course, the only thing that matters is the letter next to the name of the person in charge to most of you.

#3 | Posted by sentinel

Oh piss off moron. If you have to try this hard to avoid criticizing the current regime's entirely unprecedented actions you should just remain quiet.

Of course, they are. That's their job as the American Gestapo.

Bets that they'll be kicking in citizen's doors by the end of the year?

Yes, I realize they've already done so in Chicago with the apartment building raid, but I mean more brazenly as in no knock night raids of individual homes KNOWN to be citizens.

They will eventually drop the facade of being immigration enforcement and in a country awash with guns, that will guarantee eruptions of violence (imagine someone waking to their door being kicked in not expecting it to be federal "agents") as people will think they're acting in self-defense.

And then it will really get fun as even a few instances of that will be leveraged to the max by the administration.

Idiots like Jeff don't think they'll ever suffer the consequences of their stupidity.

So you won't hear a peep until they meekly whine about it once they do and are met with a wall of silence of jeering from everyone else.

#2 | Posted by qcp

The Dems would actually ensure consequences for members caught in this kind of behavior.

The GOP has no such scruples. Certainly not anymore.

referencing the life-saving moment he miraculously shifted his head and avoided the bullet of would-be assassin Thomas Michael Crooks in Pennsylvania last year.

LOL fake news.

Holy s*&^ I saw an article on this with pictures of these skidmarks and wow. They look exactly like you'd think they do - overweight pudgy little b*&^%es in bad suits with awful 'my mommy still combs my hair with a part on the same side every morning' looks.

No wonder they're so hateful, they probably get rejected by their hands.

Not true at all of course

#30 | Posted by THEBULL

Duhhhhh FkAe NeQzZ!!!

Idiot.

Remember, though, they'll get upset if called deplorable or racist or misogynistic and demand they not be called highly negative descriptors that they would rather whine about being called than attempt to behave in a way that they no longer can be applied ...

Oh, and what is this, something like the 3,984th "Imtold you so" of the last ten months?