More from the article...

... While the research doesn't prove direct cause and effect, it suggests some kind of association"adding to what we already know about the diets of pregnant women and how they can affect the health and development of their children.

The study team looked at data from 61,237 mothers and their children, cross-referencing diet habits of the moms while pregnant with the neurodevelopment of their kids. Even small shifts toward Western dietary patterns were linked to significant increases in the likelihood of ADHD in the next generation. One of the cohorts also showed a link between consuming a Western diet during pregnancy and the likelihood of a child developing autism. ...

More from the article...

... Companies or government agencies insist workers return to the office, but since they have no offices to return to, they must work from home. But since working from home is forbidden, they have to return to the office. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Stupid, right? Yes, but that doesn't stop increasingly obtuse managers from being obsessed with forcing workers to work in an office even when there's no power, internet access, or sometimes even space, for them to do so. ...

More from the article...

... In a letter addressed to FCC Enforcement and Media Bureau acting chiefs Patrick Webre and Erin Boone, the Democrat senator from Connecticut blasted the agency for singling out media broadcasters that "faced the wrath of President Trump during his Presidential campaign, including actual litigation or outright threats of investigations in retaliation for perceived negative coverage."

He noted that the "exclusive targeting to the apparent benefit of the President" is further reflected by FCC chairman Brendan Carr deciding to not renew a news distortion complaint against a Fox TV station nor launch any investigation into News Corp. around its diversity, equity and inclusion policies. ...

(aside: drudge.com seems to be having issues this evening ....)

... Markets crave certainty; what they are getting from Trump's White House is chaos. ...

I'd say, not just chaos, but whimsical chaos.

@#11 ... get with the jist of the exchange. ...

I presume that was about my @10 comment.

... Court's have enjoined his stupid but the question was about discipline (sanctions) ...

But I'll ask again, if Pres Trump decides that he will not follow the Court decision, what can the Court do to make him follow that decision?

Any enforcement of the decision would likely fall onto the DoJ, which Pres trump (did you listen to his speech?) seems to have in his pocket.

So, yeah, my question may be outside of the gist of the exchange, but I think it is relevant.

So, what say ye?

@#11 ... get with the jist of the exchange. ...

I presume that was about my @10 comment.

... Court's have enjoined his stupid but the question was about discipline (sanctions) ...

But I'll ask again, if Pres Trump decides that he will not follow the Court decision, what can the Court do to make him follow that decision?

Any enforcement of the decision would likely fall onto the DoJ, which Pres trump (did you listen to his speech?) seems to have in his pocket.

So, yeah, my question may be outside of the gist of the exchange, but I think it is relevant.

So, what say ye?

@#11 ... get with the jist of the exchange. ...

I presume that was about my @10 comment.

... Court's have enjoined his stupid but the question was about discipline (sanctions) ...

But I'll ask again, if Pres Trump decides that he will not follow the Court decision, what can the Court do to make him follow that decision?

Any enforcement of the decision would likely fall onto the DoJ, which Pres trump (did you listen to his speech?) seems to have in his pocket.

So, yeah, my question may be outside of the gist of the exchange, but I think it is relevant.

So, what say ye?

@#28 ... but if it's okay to protest outside of a Planned Parenthoods, I think you should be able to protest outside a Tesla dealership ...

Yup.

Wait, what ...???

@#5 ... No, not as long as progress is being made. This problem didn't come about overnight and it won't be fixed overnight either.. ...

Wait, what?

Pres Trump promised to solve this problem quickly.

Now your current alias is calling him a liar?

I mean, 909.09 months.

Is that "quickly?"

@#6 ... Yes but only for what they do in court. ...

So, outside of court, the Judiciary can do nothing?

@#26 ... A reminder in dark times: kindness, mercy, decency, and respect towards the least of us enrages Trumpists. It burns them. ...

imo, it is similar to MAGA being unable to say, "we are all Americans."

Pres Trump has divided this great Country to the point that he has his followers ascribing "enemy" to those who disagree with him.

How will that build American Excellence going forward?

@#76 ...I couldn't explain it in a way that you could understand ...

Does that explain, what seems to be, an apparent inability of your current alias to understand what it parrots?

If so, an interesting admission.

@#5 ... Judges getting a bit quicker to respond to this idiocy. ...

Yeah, that seems to be the case.

But I have to ask ...

If the Judicial branch says that what Pres Trump is doing is illegal and tells him to stop.

If he does not stop ...

Then what?

Pres Trump controls the law-enforcement part of the government.

So, if he decides not to enforce a Court Order, then what?

@#2 ... Gracie is STUPID Incarnate.

That Sow is one Toxic Bitych.

She's Too Dumb. ...

I disagree. Strongly.

I've had good discussions with the gracieamazed alias.

While I don't always (OK, rarely) agree with what that alias posts, I remain to be convinced that the ascription your current alias applies is correct.

@#7

Funny, now that it may have become apparent that Pres Putin seems to own Pres Trump, this current alias seems to be taking a different approach?

Why?

@#55 ... Here's the full quote ...

... and I asked, Got an example?

I'll ask again, Got an example?

@#35 ... Farmers are just dumb Hicks. ...

Another talking point issued to your current alias?

Denigrating those who feed us?

OK, let me ask that differently, what does your current alias know about farming?

@#3 ... Wait, the left hates billionaires, or do they? ...

... and that question relates to the thread topic .... how?

From the cited article ...

... Several top corporate CEOs recently confided that despite their public shows of fealty to President Donald Trump, they are less than flattering of him behind closed doors.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump was the main topic of conversation a gathering of corporate executives at the Yale CEO Caucus earlier this week. The economy has been on a roller coaster ride since Trump announced -- and then almost immediately withdrew -- punishing new tariffs on all goods imported from Canada and Mexico. 25% tariffs on Canadian imported steel and aluminum products went into effect Wednesday, however.

When Trump suggested doubling his steel and aluminum tariffs, the roomful of CEOs " which included JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, Pfizer CEO Albert Boula and Dell CEO Michael Dell -- the Journal reported that the room "responded with a mix of groans and shocked laughter." ...

So, I ask, how does your current alias get from those comments to, "Wait, the left hates billionaires, or do they?"

Do try to keep up ...

@#2 ... I know you want them gone already ...

Do you really want to look into my mind?

... but hold your horses and give the team a few months.. It's going to take a little time. ...

OK, I'll ask ...

How much more time?

Stated differently...

Given the current rate of deportation of illegal immigrants, how long will it take to reach the goal Pres Trump has set for "10's of millions" to be deported?

@#4 ... The little douche humiliated himself ...

My view is that Pres Zelenskyy stood up for his efforts to protect the freedom and Democracy in his country.

That meeting looked more like an ambush orchestrated by Pres Trump and VP Vance to please Pres Putin.

When else in Oval Office history has a Leader of State been treated so badly for upholding freedom and Democracy in their country?

... assurances that Elon Musk's DOGE team is not feeding sensitive government data into "unapproved and unaccountable" AI systems. ...

The MAGA cheerleaders here have often emphasized, "read-only" access (incorrectly? But I won't go there for now).

So this "read-only" may be used to ~educate~ AI?

For what purpose?

Where is the transparency that DOGE has promised?

More from the article ...

... The letters [PDF], penned by Gerald Connolly (D-VA), the most senior Democrat on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, refer to several national newspaper reports claiming the Trump-blessed ------------ job-cutting DOGE unit has whipped out commercial AI tools at federal agencies to analyze projects, staffing, and other data without first carrying out appropriate safety and security reviews. The lawmakers say it would be inappropriate for the personal information of Americans to be sifted through by such systems.

Connolly also expressed concern over reported claims DOGE has proposed cuts at many agencies based on the advice of unvetted AI systems following this analysis work.

"Federal agencies are bound by multiple statutory requirements in their use of AI software," Connolly said, citing Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) standards for cloud computing security as one such requirement.

"Failing to ensure that AI vendors ... have adequate FedRAMP approval risks violating the Privacy Act of 1974, the Federal Information Security Management Act, and the E-Government Act of 2002," Connolly continued. ...