"The FBI has told Citibank that recipients of EPA climate grants are being considered as potentially liable for fraud. That is, the Trump administration wants to criminalize work on climate science and impacts," the @capitolhunters account wrote Wednesday on X.

I love the spin that Trump wants to criminalize work on climate science. The amount of fraud and theft that was done under the roof of climate change will be shown to be astronomical. The amount of tax payer money that was stolen is definitely criminal.

Republicans showing their true colors.

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-13 01:51 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Hey, if there was no fraud ,like you say, what are you worried about? You should welcome this so if no wrongdoing is found you can say I told you so.
Dems are so against this time of investigation because they know it exposes them as the thieves.

The amount of fraud and theft that was done under the roof of climate change will be shown to be astronomical.

#3 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Uh....When?

#5 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-13 01:52 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Uh.....When? After they do the investigation numbnuts.

Again, what are Dems so afraid of?

You need a link for that Stinkpaw. Nobody is gonna accept your word.

#10 | Posted by Wardog at 2025-03-13 01:56 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

A link for what, the results of an investigation that hasn't been done yet?

#6 "Democratic Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams is facing condemnation from conservatives after she appeared on MSNBC to defend a $2 billion initiative under the Biden administration's EPA to purchase green energy appliances for Americans.

"Stacey Abrams linked Power Forward Communities received $2 billion in tax dollars in 2024 after reporting just $100 in revenue the year before. They were so unqualified that the grant agreement required the NGO to complete How to Develop a Budget' training within 90 days,"

I think this is worth investigating. Again if nothing was done wrong at least we will know.

What's the EVIDENCE for REASONABLE suspicion and PROBABLE CAUSE?

You are a drooling idiot. Wipe your effing face.

#20 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-13 02:02 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Ok, for you as well. "Democratic Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams is facing condemnation from conservatives after she appeared on MSNBC to defend a $2 billion initiative under the Biden administration's EPA to purchase green energy appliances for Americans.

"Stacey Abrams linked Power Forward Communities received $2 billion in tax dollars in 2024 after reporting just $100 in revenue the year before. They were so unqualified that the grant agreement required the NGO to complete How to Develop a Budget' training within 90 days,"

I think this is worth investigating. Again if nothing was done wrong at least we will know.

Nobody claimed Trump supporters are smart.

As a matter of fact, Trump referred to his own followers as the "poorly educated", and his voters go out of their way to prove him correct. Everyday!

#24 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-13 02:06 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

You voted for Harris after telling us Biden was sharper than a tack.

We can see exactly who the "thieves" are. They are the ones who are trying to steal our democracy right out from under us.

Now. Who will investigate these so called "investigators"?

#26 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-03-13 02:07 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

My how we have changed our tune since the Russiagate investigation. Do you have the concrete evidence that Schiff told us he had for 4 years?

Hey, if there was no fraud ,like you say, what are you worried about?

Define fraud. Where is all this "fraud"? Fraud is a crime. How much have you found? Who is getting charged? When will the prosecutions begin? Also how much have you actually found? Now compare that to the harm you are causing. Then STFU.

So why wouldn't you be pissed if say 2 billion was allotted to climate science but only a small portion of that actually went to the to the study?

"I think this is worth investigating."

Worth how much in taxpayer money, to find fraud, stating from zero evidence of fraud?

How much should we be spending? Is one $400,000 Trump Presidential Salary enough, or should we spend one $25,000,000 Trump Super Bowl Trip?

You don't think before you speak. Or after, for that matter.

#29 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-13 02:11 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

You didn't have a problem spending $43 million on Russia gate. So all of a sudden you are worried about the costs of investigations?

So desperate for a win, you don't care that they're destroying the federal government and driving our nation into a depression.

#34 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-13 02:18 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Blah, blah, blah. Get some new material instead of belching out the same old MSNBC talking points. Which btw you are most likely the only viewer.