This just --------- raped a woman.

#1 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS

You need a straight jacket.

#5 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

Truth hurts don't it magat bitch

This just --------- raped a woman.

#1 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS

You need a straight jacket.

#5 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

Truth hurts don't it magat bitch

Seems to me this is a play to get Gaetz through confirmation.

This just --------- raped a woman.

You unamerican ------- ----

CIA admits to losing dozens of informants around the world: NYT
by Monique Beals - 10/05/21 2:24 PM ET

The answer is he was none of that.

He was found liable for sexual assault that the judge state, unequivocally means rape.

He had literally hundreds of documents that he was not entitled to possess

I just can't with the campaign fraudster and oh dear god vote stealing conspirator. I am curious my dear turd, was ------- lying when he said the 2020 election was stolen, given the results of the 2024 election?

Do not put words in my mouth you ------- -------.

The answer is simple.

Nearly 50% of American voters made a choice. They are either evil or stupid.

I know which one you are, magat scum.

Deep breaths, Truth.

While I do appreciate your fortitude over the past couple weeks dealing with the gloating trolls and shortsighted morons.

I was trying my best for a bit of civility.

#19 | Posted by ClownShack

That is fine for you, I applaud you.

I view the election of ------- a direct assault on me and my loved ones.

They declared war.

I will never forgive, nor will I ever forget.

---- the magat scum, they deserve nothing but contempt.

Mass Deportation

I'm just gonna post this here

Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

People, NOT citizens, NOT legal immigrants, PEOPLE

Fifth Amendment
No person shall {SNIP} be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

14th Amendment

Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

There is zero chance that a mass deportation can work in compliance with these rights.

This just goes to show you magat scum HATE the constitution.

and on a place where at least 1 poster is running calling everyone a ----, piece of ----, scum, etc....you're gonna criticize me for "little girl" when she has girl in her actual username?

What I did wasn't even as bad as "Beverly".

You're so biased it's beyond the pale.

#10 | Posted by eberly

---- you ----, now go call another poster a little girl for posting a reasonable criticism of you.

Like the bitch you are

#157. Correct. And it speaks to my point of Congress ceding it's powers to the Executive.

#158 | Posted by BellRinger

Jeff thinks that congress should be reviewing HUD applications and EPA permit applications.

Jeff isn't too bright.

#157. Correct. And it speaks to my point of Congress ceding it's powers to the Executive.

#158 | Posted by BellRinger

Which you denied the senate was doing now for -------

You're a piece of ---- jeff.

I wonder what ever happened to people like him to make them so hateful of strangers humanity who are doing no one harm and live in danger

I have no idea how to fix that, having lived in reality all my life

If you lived in reality, you could type, "Boaz, trans woman are not real women, just men in dresses".

But you will never write that. Because like most liberals, you live in fantasy land.

#140 | Posted by boaz

And I am not going to have the same fight for the 1000th time but you are again OBJECTIVELY wrong.

I, get it, you don't agree, but there are objective definitions to words like gender, and men and women

And a trans woman is a woman, She is NOT biologically female and never can be, but she is still a woman.

It is a simple concept, which for SOME reason bothers you to an incredible degree as it shouldn't impact your life one way or another.

But I will NOT argue this point with you. You are wrong and that is that

Thank you Alex for that clear and concise post. I wish I could have said it so succinctly and accurately.

on't deflect.

Why not? You do.

Harris didn't lose because of her message or how she communicated or who the messenger was or in what venues the message was given,

Um, yes she did. And that's your problem.

In July 2023, Judge Kaplan clarified that the jury had found that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common definition of the word.

No they didnt. If they did, then Trump would be in jail. He is not. And I bet that "judge" is of the liberal type.

And it was a civilian trial, not a criminal one, where you can say almost anything, with no proof and get a "conviction".

#139 | Posted by boaz a

I simply do not deflect, but your, I know you are but what am I defense is noted

the message that ------- is a rapist is a. clear, b. true, c. nearly universally known and SHOULD be disqualifying.

I get it, you don't believe he is a rapist, but he was found liable for his assault, which the judge described as rape.

He does not have to be found criminally guilty to be a rapist. OJ is a murderer which was confirmed when he was held liable for the 2 deaths.

You just can't whatever that away. that is objective reality. This is what I mean by you don't live in reality. He was found liable for what the judge called substantially rape and yes i admit there is a bit of pedantic but the definition is the clearest and most accurate definition of his actions.

You can't say almost anything, you must have proof and it is not a "conviction" you get. You get held liable for your actions

I honestly would not be surprised if ------- appointed Dr. Vinny Boombatz as Surgeon General.

Dr. Doctor for Press Secretary than?

He IS a rapist. He was found to be a rapist in a court of law.

I dont agree. Whatever.

And you right here when faced with objective facts, deny reality

Again, I dont agree.

#133 | Posted by boaz

I would argue this is the heart of the matter. Far more broadly than ------- being a rapist.

Harris didn't lose because of her message or how she communicated or who the messenger was or in what venues the message was given, it was not Biden's fault, or Obama's fault, or never trumpers fault, or Liz Cheney's fault, it's not she was to left leaning or too right leaning or too centrist...

it was this simple fact.

Magat scum live in unreality. They simply deny reality as it is presented. Nothing can break through that rock of disbelief.

I have no idea how to fix that, having lived in reality all my life, well accept for a stint in college but that was another life.

Don't deflect.

Do you accept that he was found liable for the actions he inflicted on E. Jean Carroll?

I would be honestly curious of a poll of ------- voters as to whether they think he is a rapist.

Would that number approach zero?

Is denialism that strong?

I have had onewhatever plonked for ever; he is not worth engaging.

I think you inadvertently found a truth.

First of all, it is not my perception. He IS a rapist. He was found to be a rapist in a court of law. That MAKES him a rapist under the law.

He was not found guilty criminally because the statute of limitations was up. But a court found him a rapist. That is a simple fact.

So, it is true, you may not like it, but it is reality.

You may disagree with the verdict, but that simply makes you uninformed.

You may claim his isn't a rapist, but that makes you objectively wrong.

And you take that with ALL of his other misogyny and the words actually from his own mouth and it is clear what he is.

But, you're right, many Americans (I won't agree most) don't think he is.

And they are wrong.

Because objective fact still exists. And a court found him to be a rapist.

That is an objective fact.

But, I get it, many Americans don't think he is.

And you right here when faced with objective facts, deny reality

And THAT is the problem.

Dr. No for Dept. of the Interior!!!

I am not sure why I am bothering responding to you-you are certainly not worth the bother, unfortunately I saw your post when i looked at my phone where I was signed out

He was adjudicated a rapist, just ask the judge.

I do think it quite obvious that it fits neatly with the rest of his behavior.

You, of course, don't answer the question, (not surprising), except MAYBE to hint at denialism?

Other than that to say he was "better than the alternative" is a moron's response. It says absolutely nothing.

More pablum from the idiot brigade

Oh and don't bother to respond, I have you plonked as you never add anything to any conversation