" These people are resource drains."

That's not what folks who understand the equation say.

What kind of Math are you using? Actual Math, which says something else entirely, or Republican Math, where you use whatever number fits your talking points???

" So, how much of the $1.7B does she get?"

Twice what Hunter Biden does!

"Not exactly true."

What part, specifically? Because I can provide links to prove the claims are EXACTLY true.

Will you address the truth, or run from it?

"This is my personal educated guess."

Educated?!?

You refuse to read links, you refuse to study the Heritage Foundation's decades of research, you refuse to adhere to the most basic concept of science: proof.

Your education consists of you telling yourself your guesses are correct. That's not "educated". That's self-deluded.

"My opinions on mail-in ballots are not based on emotions."

WHAT?!?

You FINALLY have proof of purloined ballots??? Link to it!

Oh, wait ... you've got no links? ZERO proof?

That's just fee-fees, buddy. You've created a fantasy based on wish-casting.

" Trump has been dealing with politically motivated accusations and prosecutions for years. That's lawfare."

You've given the definition incorrectly; you're missing the central tenet.

The definition of lawfare is prosecuting someone for an action ANYONE ELSE COULD DO WITHOUT FEAR OF LEGAL REPERCUSSIONS.

Trump was NEVER subject to lawfare, as the courts held time and again.

As for you, you can't name a single one of Trump's 91 indictments which you or I could've done without fear of legal repercussions.

I know: I've been asking for an example of lawfare for years, and no one has been able to come up with any proof of a single example. You remember proof, don't you, Bill?

"Thank God she lost."

Admit you're a Slurper without using those specific words.

"Unless Obama was going to be the one really running things again like many people believe he did during Biden's presidency."

Is that what YOU believe, Bill?

And do you have any proof, or this another of your "gut feelings" with no proof whatsoever?

"I just find it hard to believe she actually got so many people to vote for her."

Well, what percentage of her votes do you believe were out-and-out illegal?

" It's immaterial for what I said. Biden pardoned his family."

If you think Biden pardoning his family AFTER the PRESIDENT-ELECT had publicly threatened lawfare against them is immaterial, you're a moron.

" I don't want to suppress votes."

What a riot.

You can't even admit same-day, in-person voting is easy to manipulate.

" I'm wondering how many are bogus. You know....illegal."

Try researching folks who actually look into this stuff, like the Heritage Foundation. You'll find that number is much closer to zero than you currently imagine.

Then again, they only operate on facts, not gut feelings with zero empirical proof, so you may not like what you find.

Can you handle the truth?

"It's just astounding how many ballots voted for her."

Gosh. It almost sounds like you like to suppress those votes.

"That's actually immaterial."

That's one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Of course it's material: Trump threatened lawfare after he'd won the presidency, but before he had taken office.

What, did your "news" outlets forget to report that part?

" Applying justification after the fact doesn't really change that."

WTF are you talking about?!? We've lived through the proof ever since.

Trump's DOJ has committed LAWFARE on a near-daily basis. They've filed suit and failed against James Comey, Leticia James, and others who they couldn't even get a warrant for, the case was so weak.

Your "news" outlets think you're stupid.

"That's actually immaterial."

Trump threatened them with LAWFARE.

It's VERY material.

" Biden pardoned his entire family."

AFTER Trump publicly threatened them.

You're watching "news" from sources who think you can't handle the full truth.

" and the US Flag Has 11 Stripes"

Well, you know what that means, don't you?!? It's SHARPIE time!

Now ... which two colonies will be getting the axe?

"Those Republicans all died, and their talking points died with them."

They're all now resting in the fastest growing cemetery in the universe: The place where Republican talking points go to die.

" precluded" the IRS from pursuing Trump, his family members, and his companies over any unpaid taxes."

Nearly 40 years of studying tax cases and dealing with the IRS.

I've NEVER EVEN HEARD of any deal like this, especially a deal which essentially gives carte blanche for his whole family to break the law.

Where are the actual patriots to weigh in?

Remember all the folks who lost their schitttt when Hillary Clinton made $100,000?

Seems quaint, doesn't it?

"I wasn't aware that warrants were always required by law"

You're missing the point: ICE AUTHORIZED the warrantless search.

Almost sounds as unconstitutional as denial of Due Process, doesn't it?

"Welcome to CA where the income inequality is the largest in the world"

Which is EXACTLY what happens in the equation at the places with the most upside potential.

"Yet I have never heard, nor seen a legal retort."

" they may have thought the gun was still in Alex's possession. Alex had a long standing history of using physical force."

Risible.

The cops had no way of knowing ANY of his prior history ... but here you are, lying about the known facts at that moment.

What a good little fascist you turned out to be!