"Yeah these whackos challenge anything"

Anything that is illegal. Of course! Which is the job of the opposition party. Remember when the you "maga whackos" challenged everything you could possibly challenge when Obama tried to enact his agenda?

The Trumpy theory of gubmint,

The Mad King does what he feels like doing ... and then he sits back and says,

"Now prove me wrong."

And so the courts do.

seems to suggest that you know what is in someone else's "mind", which is of course not possible.

That's obviously not true. Especially someone as shallow minded and narcissistic as Trumpy.

It's easy to tell what's going on in Trumpy's brain.

His mouth has no filter and everything in his feeble brain comes directly right out his mouth. There is obviously no thinking involved.

THEY ARE EATING THE PETS!!

He spews abuse, his reward your slobber.

#23 | POSTED BY CABRON_LOCO

His reward and ours is your faux rage at being mocked in your own language.

Thanks for the lols.

BUT only, we can re-interpret the language of the statute, and decide if the judgment of the POTUS is really the correct judgment.

#76 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

"We" being the courts.

Out of 143 executive orders 120 have been challenged in the courts as illegal or unconstitutional.

So Trumpy has a pretty bad record for understanding the constitution and what is legal and what is not.

Therefore every EO has to be checked by an adult.

But what else would you expect from a convicted felon?

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt says "we will win this battle in court" and the administration is working to "tackle rogue judges"

And hopefully his lawyers can do something about that stupid constitution that Trumpy is just not sure he really has to follow.

Surely his lawyers can find a loophole in there somewhere that he can exploit for his evil agendas.

Trump has No Plan ...

Coulda just stopped right there.

Unless you consider his enriching himself at every opportunity at the expense of others a Plan.

Is this your all's bitter drunk uncle sitting in the corner that no one will talk to?

#19 | POSTED BY CABRON_LOCO

Actually Mr LOCO he is the DR bulldog who is able to speak to you in your own language.

That explains it.

#43 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Which begs the question.

What's your excuse?

lol

Like Businesses are gong to listen to Americans.

Businesses listen to profits.

The only way they won't turn to AI is that if it's not profitable.

And of course it won't matter even if they listened.

Our adversaries like China is not going to slow down and be careful.

SpaceX Reached Space with Starship, Then Lost Control

Hmmm. Sounds familiar.

Elmo also reached the highest most powerful office in the U.S.

Then Lost Control.

The stuff they have access to today is nothing like we had in the 80's.

#2 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Like the Internet? Good luck with keeping them off that.

I get it's a huge problem....and solving it? well, honestly I don't know how. But I'm not going to criticize anybody for trying.
#27 | POSTED BY EBERLY

It's not an unsolvable problem. But as you said it will take layered approach over time.

But unilateral disarmament is definitely not the answer.

The fight against dark money in politics will take a multi-pronged approach that includes;
1. strengthening transparency,
2. limiting the influence of large donors,
3. potentially overturning the Citizens United decision through constitutional amendments.

But most of all it requires the will of the majority to do something about it.

Just for the record, as the whinging and whining drone on: The judges on the panel were Reagan, Trump, and Obama appointees.

#33 | POSTED BY DOC_SARVIS

And we know exactly which one Mad King Trumpy will try to have fired.

The guy who's frightened to death of firearms calling someone else a snowflake.

#26 | POSTED BY WILLOWBY

Firearms do not frighten me. Are you too frightened to be without one? My preference is a world where I am not FORCED to carry one.

It's lunatics like you who have purposely misinterpreted the intent of the constitution and think everyone should and is qualified to possess firearms that have me concerned.

And if you are too afraid of the noise deadly weapons make when they are fired you should definitely choose another hobby.

They're devices to reduce hearing impairment, they shouldn't even be regulated beyond normal consumer protections.

#17 | POSTED BY VISITOR

There are plenty of good hearing protectors on the market.

If guns are too loud for you snowflakes and wearing hearing protection is too hard for you to handle maybe you should find a more quiet hobby. Like gardening or photography or art or raising chickens.

I personally would prefer to know when deadly weapons are being fired in my neighborhood or my vicinity.

As of this posting this CDC website still recommends the vaccine for everyone 6 months and older.

We care a great deal about those worth caring about. You MAGAt filth don't fit that criteria.

Go cry someone a river, and beg for FEMA aid.

With dems in charge you might get it. But your orange god-king will tell you to pound sand :)
#18 | POSTED BY BILLY_BOY

That's a Fact Jack!!

If not that day he would've been dead in 6 months from heart failure.

#11 | POSTED BY BLUEWAFFLES

Twist it anyway you like if it makes you maga maroons feel better.

It changes nothing. His death was ruled a homicide. His murderer was convicted and sent to prison.

You are still not allowed to kill people even if you think they will die anyway.

Maybe if you morons raise enough maga stink or bribe Trumpy by buying his crypto trash he might pardon the murderer for you.

While we're dicking around with AI, Chinas on the moon gathering Helium-3 for it's future energy needs.

#4 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

They should probably it actually land a man there first.

And if we don't "dick around" with AI China definitely will. So we actually have no choice anymore.

Since they haven't managed to even land a man on the moon yet they best get on it or are they gonna send the very same AI there that we are just currently "dicking around with" ?

"wasteful and ineffective," though without citing evidence to support those claims."

Ipse dixit

I am beginning to really like that Latin phrase.

It perfectly describes Trump's and maga maroons justification for pretty much anything.

"Form upon" should be "frowned upon" ...

Re 77

In the Before Times even the appearance of corrupt or unethical behavior was from upon because it gave the opposition the opportunity to cast doubt on your ethics.

But that was BT (Before Trump) and this is now. So viewing it from this perspective or frame of reference you are absolutely correct.

How much money flowed into the Clinton Foundation while either was in office?

I agree it did not look great. Which is why we used to be concerned about ethics and how things appeared to the public.

But why does that bother you now? We don't care anymore apparently.

How much of that money was actually taken as their salary or personal use?
Zero.

How much flowed after they left office?

Why would that even matter? Especially if none of it ever ended up in a Clinton bank account for their personal use?

Re 6

You beat me to it! Great minds think alike.

If they had all used silencers the rest of the boaters could still just vacation on without the annoying interruption of another mass shooting.

Uh huh. No one was more silent about the subject than the Biden Administration.

#14 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Ipse dixit

So it must be true!

So when Biden warned the world a month in advance of Putin's intent to invade Ukraine he did it "silently"?