They made a documentary recently about Thomas Jefferson and all they seemed to talk about or discuss about him revolved around slavery. It was utterly ridiculous.
Thomas Jefferson, like all people have many aspects to their character/lives. Why shouldn't all aspects of his character/life be explored? As significant a person as he was in American history, I am sure that his life has been explored in great detail. This particular documentarian explored an aspect of his life that (s)he felt was worthy of further exploration. What's wrong with that? Authors of books do it all the time. How many books have been written about Lincoln and other famous people? Further more, authors/documentarians are not experts in all aspects of their subject's life. They certainly would be out of line to opine on aspects of their subject's life for which they aren't experts.
We happen to live in an age where more details about our troubled past is being revealed and it is very upsetting to some people. These details were purposely omitted from the public record and represented a white washing of history. Many people just can't handle the truth. Why is that?
It's been reported that 70% of the people affected by the Obamacare subsidy and Medicaid cuts are in red states. This woman, a republican voter, is typical of many (most) of them. In all likelihood, republicans have lost this voter and many more to come. Poor, white, rural voters will eventually come to understand that they are just tools of the rich. Republicans will promise them anything (religious freedom, tough on crime, get rid of illegals, etc.) as long as there is little or no cost to it.