Who in their right mind would buy a Tesla now

MAGA crayon eaters with cash to burn.

Congress didnt like that either, because less flights coming through meant less flexibility for their schedules.

That does seem to be one of the underlying themes in this investigation. VIPs wanting what they want.

Common sense

Common sense says an airliner that is 20 seconds from touchdown should not have any other traffic anywhere near it.

"The nuclear deterrent is the backbone of American security and stability " period.

That's pretty sad.

But the copter pilot was talking and didn't receive the message.

The pilot flying was not the one using the radio. The pilot was flying, the Instructor Pilot was managing the radio.

Indications are he CRJ saw the chopper at the last second and tried to evade, but the chopper shows no sign of ever seeing the jet.

Long line of things lined up for a bad outcome by the sounds of it.

Like this dirtbag knows manure from m'n'ms...

When in doubt, lay on thick with the acronyms.

if you dial in the wrong pressure

Did they?

I see a lot of Teslas on the road here because I'm surrounded by a high concentration of Indians and Asians.

If I spend a day on the local roads here I might see one. My lifetime Cybertruck sightings is now at 4.

NO ONE seems willing or capable of stopping this man from doing pretty much anything he wants.

I hope he wasn't lying about getting rid of DST... it's just about that time.

I would think Teslas would suck in such frigid climates.

The Ford Lightning pickups seem to work ok in the cold. A few of the mines here are running them.

I don't see a lot of Teslas here to begin with, but whatever.

They don't have to report immediately.

They do if they enter illegally. Some tidbits from the UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, of which the US is a signatory:

The contracting states shall not:

-discriminate against refugees (Article 3)

-take exceptional measures against a refugee solely on account of his or her nationality (Article 8)

-impose penalties on refugees who entered illegally in search of asylum if they present themselves without delay (Article 31), which is commonly interpreted to mean that their unlawful entry and presence ought not to be prosecuted at all

-expel refugees (Article 32)

-forcibly return or "refoul" refugees to the country they have fled from (Article 33). It is widely accepted that the prohibition of forcible return is part of customary international law.

Maybe true in Canada.

It's true in any country that is a signatory of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951.

This includes the USA, until Lewzer pulls out of it.

exercise will do the Left some good

So by "the Left", you are referring to these Trump-voting Republican farmers from Wisconsin?

Here's food for thought:

If the Gulf of Mexico is now the Gulf of America, and New Mexico is now New America,

Does than mean Mexicans are now Americans?

Only if they go through an established port of entry.

That is not true either, provided that they present themselves right away as seeking asylum.

The people in NYC were asylum seekers. It's as simple as that. Therefore, not illegal aliens.

Better than a brain dead POTUS

Lewzer is well on his way... that's going to be part of the fun.

Yea they're illegals.

Not yet. Entering a country to seek asylum is not illegal. Lewzer will fix that, but he hasn't yet.

Is it making anyone feel better

Yes. An unhinged ignorant lunatic as POTUS? It's funny as ----. And he's just getting started! I wonder what he is going to call the Moon?

I wonder how much it costs to rebrand an entire state? Road signs, licence plates, all that paperwork? I suppose New America has to foot the bill for all that?

Lewzer quotes:

"Why Is @BarackObama constantly issuing executive orders that are major power grabs of authority?"

"The country wasn't based on executive orders,"

"Right now, Obama goes around signing executive orders. He can't even get along with the Democrats, and he goes around signing all these executive orders. It's a basic disaster. You can't do it."

When I called you LuftWaffles

You nailed that one.

They are illegal aliens.

The article says they are asylum seekers. Is seeking asylum illegal?