Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, February 12, 2025

The $80 million in funding was clawed back after the Trump administration claimed the money was being used to house migrants in "luxury hotels."

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

NYC Comptroller: "This morning, my financial team shockingly uncovered that President Trump and his crony Elon Musk illegally executed a revocation of $80 million in congressionally-appropriated FEMA funding from New York City's bank accounts late yesterday afternoon. This is money that the federal government previously disbursed for shelter and services and is now missing. This highway robbery of our funds directly out of our bank account is a betrayal of everyone who calls New York City home."

"New York City cannot take this lying down. I call on the Mayor to immediately pursue legal action to ensure the tens of millions of dollars stolen by Trump and DOGE are rightfully returned. If instead Mayor Adams continues to be President Trump's pawn, my Office will request to work in partnership with the New York City Law Department to pursue aggressive legal action."

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Yeah ... FEMA is for emergencies involving Americans, they're not Americans so we need that money back.

#1 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-02-12 09:06 PM | Reply

Also if you guys want to help the illegals, start your own Gofundme

#2 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-02-12 09:07 PM | Reply

They're not "illegals" you stupid stupid ----

#3 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-02-12 09:14 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

They're 100% illegals. They didn't come here with visas now did they?

#4 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-02-12 09:17 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Yeah ... FEMA is for emergencies involving Americans, they're not Americans so we need that money back.

Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-02-12 09:06 PM | Reply

You ignorant sap. FEMA is for anyone who finds themselves in a national crisis. It's not just for US Citizens. Good God Almighty.

#5 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-02-12 09:19 PM | Reply

They are illegal aliens. Also, Congress appropriates a lump sum to FEMA. From there the Executive decides how to utilize those funds and resources based on need. It's right in the name of the agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Congress doesn't pull out a crystal ball when appropriating the money and determine in advance where natural disasters will occur. FEMA acted outside of its role here - it's an agency that serves at the direction of the president.

Funds allocated to New York to house illegal aliens is not an executive priority right now. In fact, it's prohibited. 4 people have been fired so far including FEMA's CFO.

#6 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-12 09:21 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"luxury hotels" is, of course, a lie

I suspect that is true. Have any of these luxury hotels been identified? I'd like to look them up and check on the level of luxury.

If FEMA is paying $2-3K per night to house individual migrants that should certainly be looked into.

#7 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-02-12 09:28 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Laura, I didn't realize we sent FEMA funds to Africans or Europeans abroad. Please elaborate further ...

#8 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-02-12 09:35 PM | Reply

I'd like to look them up and check on the level of luxury.

The article says the city was paying an average of $156/night for hotel rooms. Is that "luxury" in NYC? I always thought NYC was really expensive.

#9 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-02-12 09:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

They are illegal aliens.

The article says they are asylum seekers. Is seeking asylum illegal?

#10 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-02-12 09:59 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Is seeking asylum illegal?

Depends on the color of your skin.

The more melanin you have, the more illegal it becomes.

#11 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-02-12 10:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Yea they're illegals. So sorry if calling them what they are offends you, welcome back to reality.

#12 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-02-12 11:02 PM | Reply

Illegal aliens is a racist term used to dehumanize an already vulnerable group of people. Just sayin

#13 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-02-12 11:11 PM | Reply

Laura Mohr,

Illegal alien is a legal term. It's right in our legal code.

#14 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-12 11:29 PM | Reply

Yea they're illegals.

Not yet. Entering a country to seek asylum is not illegal. Lewzer will fix that, but he hasn't yet.

#15 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-02-12 11:34 PM | Reply

Illegal alien is a legal term. It's right in our legal code.

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-12 11:29 PM | Reply

It's also part of our racist heritage. I'm sure you want to continue with that racist heritage knowing what you called the people who picked our crops and mowed our lawns. Just sayin

#16 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-02-12 11:41 PM | Reply

"Entering a country to seek asylum is not illegal."

Only if they go through an established port of entry. Anyone with minimal paperwork can make an asylum claim at a port of entry. Because our asylum system is abused still doesn't change that - it's not open season to just come in wherever one wishes.

"I'm sure you want to continue with that racist heritage knowing what you called the people"

I didn't create the term and citing our legal code is not an act of racism.

#17 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-12 11:53 PM | Reply

The people in NYC were asylum seekers. It's as simple as that. Therefore, not illegal aliens.

#18 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-02-12 11:56 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

I didn't create the term and citing our legal code is not an act of racism.

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-12 11:53 PM | Reply

You're absolutely hopeless Jeff. Not surprisingly however.

#19 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-02-13 12:02 AM | Reply

Only if they go through an established port of entry.

That is not true either, provided that they present themselves right away as seeking asylum.

#20 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-02-13 12:05 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

It's a legal term, Laura Mohr.

www.ojp.gov

#21 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-13 12:09 AM | Reply

That is not true either, provided that they present themselves right away as seeking asylum.
#20 | POSTED BY REDIAL

Maybe true in Canada.

But in the US, they have one full year to apply.

The statute specifically states that an asylum applicant must demonstrate "by clear and convincing evidence that the application has been filed within 1 year after the date of the [applicant's] arrival in the United States.
immigrationequality.org

#22 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-02-13 01:44 AM | Reply


The people in NYC were asylum seekers. It's as simple as that. Therefore, not illegal aliens.
#18 | POSTED BY REDIAL

Maybe, maybe not, some maybe, some might not be, how do you know?

#23 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-02-13 01:45 AM | Reply

Call them whatever you'd like, they're about to be going back to their point of origin soon. The free ride is over.

#24 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-02-13 01:47 AM | Reply

"Entering a country to seek asylum is not illegal."

Its criminal, a felony, to not enter the country without authorization via a PoE.

Its only a civil offense to be in the country without authorization. Which can happen via visa expiration etc etc.

#25 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-02-13 01:49 AM | Reply

Its criminal, a felony, to not enter the country without authorization via a PoE.

Damn its late, ... Its a felony to enter the country without authorization.

#26 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-02-13 01:50 AM | Reply


Call them whatever you'd like, they're about to be going back to their point of origin soon. The free ride is over.
#24 | POSTED BY BLUEWAFFLES

They are more offended at Bellringers legal nomenclature, than the killing of Laken Riley

#27 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-02-13 01:51 AM | Reply

Maybe true in Canada.

It's true in any country that is a signatory of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951.

This includes the USA, until Lewzer pulls out of it.

#28 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-02-13 01:56 AM | Reply

It's true in any country that is a signatory of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951.

They don't have to report immediately.

In the US the applicant has one year to apply. Read the link.

#29 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-02-13 01:58 AM | Reply

Can I Still Apply for Asylum Even if I Am in the United States Illegally?
Yes. You may apply for asylum with USCIS regardless of your immigration status if:

You are not currently in removal proceedings
You file an asylum application within 1 year of arriving to the United States or demonstrate that you are within an exception to that rule.
www.uscis.gov

#30 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-02-13 02:01 AM | Reply

They don't have to report immediately.

They do if they enter illegally. Some tidbits from the UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, of which the US is a signatory:

The contracting states shall not:

-discriminate against refugees (Article 3)

-take exceptional measures against a refugee solely on account of his or her nationality (Article 8)

-impose penalties on refugees who entered illegally in search of asylum if they present themselves without delay (Article 31), which is commonly interpreted to mean that their unlawful entry and presence ought not to be prosecuted at all

-expel refugees (Article 32)

-forcibly return or "refoul" refugees to the country they have fled from (Article 33). It is widely accepted that the prohibition of forcible return is part of customary international law.

#31 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-02-13 02:08 AM | Reply

Yes! No more federal money for illegals!

#32 | Posted by THEBULL at 2025-02-13 09:33 AM | Reply

Asylum seekers have been rebranded as illegal brown-skinned aliens under Trump. And fnkc what your Bible says about asylum seekers, but you never read the gaddomned book anyway if you're a Trumper

#33 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-02-13 11:18 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2025 World Readable

Drudge Retort