#160 - no comment necessary, but boy howdy, they sure aren't hiding, are they? Interesting. Her district cuts out every major city in that area. It's alll rural NY. I wonder if they are they happy with the representation they have? Yuck.

All the right-wingers can do is lie. That and use derogatory language. They certainly can't use facts. Facts are the campaign killer.

You can't seriously be asking such a question from BullBringer.

That's it! "BullSlinger" fits!

"but I believed the 'alternate facts'"

She's not accountable for what you think because what you think is wrong.
It's not complicated. Except for you and Bellringer, and of course Trump.
Trump is what you get when you snort pop-rocks instead of eating them.

BREAKING NEWS
Kamala Harris has narrowed the gap against Donald Trump, a new Times/Siena poll found. He now has a one-point lead among likely voters.
New York Times just now.

This is right after the RNC Convention. Not sure how tRump gets a bUmp.
Harris' favorability has also increased substantially in the same poll.

Everybody knows LYD is a sock puppet.
Even Yav

Gee. Thanks.
lol

(oops. I said "trump")

#86 - That dog don't hunt. The one thing Democrats do is get rid of the questionable ones, unlike the Republicans. Menendez being the latest example. I had nothing kind to say about him. No one chastised me for what I said about him, either. I don't recall anyone chastising me over Anthony Weiner. I do think Al Franken got a raw deal by the Democrats, though. Bad taste, frat boy stupid stuff.

#77 - Thanks Gal. I've only really tuned in the past 3 months, but I knew she was out there well before. Nature of the position. And honestly, Trump's drama consumes almost all the oxygen in the room. Help us all.

In fact, she has been deliberately hidden in a closet for the last 4 years.

I've said this repeatedly - I've been watching her give rally speeches for the past 3 months. She has been killing it. The media isn't covering them much, but it is happening and I am watching when I can find one live, replayed, or recorded. She's been awesome. Now maybe the Press will finally start following her and putting her speeches up now that President Biden has announced he's not seeking a second term.

Sockpuppets. At least sew some eyes on.

The italics tag was swallowed (typo on my part).
That was a quote from Miranda7.
My response began with "I get that."

Gotta love Joe. He is one solid human in all the best ways. The speech tonight was humble and gracious.
The span and scope were perfect. The relevance was spot on.

I've sent Kamala a nice donation tonight in honor of Joe Biden.

We aren't sneaky. None of us plot and plan. Our biggest fault is we say whatever we think. We don't "game." You are hilarious, though.

Can't ever say anything without the "whatabout".

"So, should we be surprised that in 2024 POTUS Joe Biden passes the torch to the younger generation? Whatever senior Dems were advising him is irrelevant; Pres. Biden executed a masterstroke by timing his announcement after the RNC convention where the GOP blowhards wasted all their artillery on a diversionary target."

So important. So relevant. Intentional or not, it is brilliant in execution and/or timing.

Now Harris is raking in the cash from small donors, and the energy is off the charts.

I look forward to hearing Biden tonight.
And I look forward to a hero's welcome at the Democratic Party's National Convention for Joe Biden!

But here and now, I am PISSED. Every time I have criticized Biden, the wagons have circled, calling me a Trumper, MAGAT, etc.

I get that. I have never called you either of those. At least that's not what I think of you, so unless I was having a bad day or something I shouldn't have alleged that you are any of those things. Also thanks. You glutton for punishment!

I just don't get the point of beating Biden up. He's done. I called Clownshack out on a similar point, but I'd never accuse him of being a Trumper or MAGAt. I disagreed with Doc Sarvis on this as well. They are both posters I agree with the VAST majority of time. My point is, at this point, Democrats need to coalesce. Stop the "if only's". Stop the "told you so's".

The world is filled with "would've could've".

And that living in that world steals us from NOW. And that will put Trump back in the WH.

There's sensitive and then there is alienating everyone but those in lockstep.
I'm sensitive to it. I deplore what Israel is doing. I've written my representative, who fortunately has my view on this.
I was sick listening to Netanyahu drone on in his self-righteous (self-serving) rant before Congress today.
And the hooting and hollering by Congress? SMH.
But that posters hyperbole and constant tearing down without offering anything?
Not helping.
In the meantime I do what I can, I vote for who will be better, and if that poster thinks t there's a better option, let us all know.
Because tearing down the Democrats will put Trump in power, and Trump and Netanyahu will obliterate all of Gaza and the West Bank, and it will be settlements from the river to the sea.

So I stand by what I said.

You had to put words in LL mouth to be able to argue against the point made?
Maybe you don't have a point to make in the first place.

Personally I haven't seen anything in Biden's performance that makes me doubt he is and could have been (for much longer) a great President. The skills of his job are different than the skills and image needed to campaign. You really put a lot of your own biases and assumptions into creating a case so you can then tear it down.

Waste of time.

Not you, Rsty.

#52 - that poster's nucking futs.

If fmr Pres Trump truly wants to return to the 1950's and bring more wealth to the middle class, then his goal of tax cuts for the uber-wealthy just will not cut it.

Does that mean tax rates for the high income earners of 84.357% again?
Or maybe the early '60's when it was 91%

She's been killing it for the past 2-3 months. I've been watching whenever I could find a rally. The difference today is this is Harris' message and she owns it. I don't see that diminishing before the election.