"This is a flagrant violation of his 1A rights."

Which of the jurors should he be able to name and blame?

Related: is it okay to dox the court reporter?

"But the trial of self is over so the reasons stated for the need for the gag order seem to be gone."

Again, you're really advocating Trump be able to talk about individual jurors?

Are you pretending that wouldn't put them in danger, or is your view their safety shouldn't concern the court?

"I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh."

Now do jurors without security details.

At this point, you're on record believing their safety should be no concern of the court.

" You seem to be ignoring that we do have 1A."

You seem to be ignoring 1A has limits, especially when it involves the safety of court proceedings.

SHOULD that be a consideration, or not?

And if you're pretending jurors have nothing to worry about, check out the 60 Minutes interview of the former head of the WI Republican Party, who said he was afraid if he didn't go along with the fake elector scheme, and that caused Trump to lose, he and his family's lives would be in danger.

From Trump supporters.

IOW, even dyed-in-the-wool Republicans admit the danger you're purposely minimizing.