Thursday, June 27, 2024

SCOTUS Kneecaps Regulators

In a Thursday ruling, the Supreme Court placed new restrictions on the ability of federal agencies to charge a person or company with a violation, and to adjudicate that violation if the punishment includes monetary fines.

More

Comments

Did Clarence get a new motorhome for this one?

#1 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-06-27 12:16 PM

Wait ... that way, according to a ruling Clarence just made, the payoff will be a "gratuity" and not a "bribe."

#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2024-06-27 12:22 PM

SCOTUS kneecaps regulators

Green Party voters high-fiving each other till their arms tucker out [then they use their mouths].

#3 | Posted by censored at 2024-06-27 01:08 PM

The favoritism towards corporations by the conservatives on this SCOTUS is completely shameless.

#4 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2024-06-27 06:02 PM

Are you all aware that prior to Dodd Frank this is the exact process the SEC had to go through? Read Gorsuch's concurrence. If you care at all about 7Azanr due process rights you'll understand why this is a sound decision. Frankly, I'm surprised it was t at least 7-2.

#5 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-06-27 06:33 PM

I don't really have a problem with this.

It'll end buddy-buddy slap on the wrist fines and force the SEC and other federal regulators to charge violations as crimes, as they should be.

#6 | Posted by DarkVader at 2024-06-27 07:00 PM

Civil penalties let corporations get away with not admitting doing anything wrong.

#7 | Posted by DarkVader at 2024-06-27 07:01 PM

#5

---- off, ------.

#8 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-06-27 09:59 PM

"Are you all aware that prior to Dodd Frank this is the exact process the SEC had to go through?"

Before Dodd Frank the masters of the universe almost caused a great depression with their fraudulent loan schemes and we barely got out of it. Dodd Frank was the answer to our crime lord financiers doing whatever the hell they want.

#9 | Posted by dibblda at 2024-06-28 02:32 AM

#9. 7A has supremacy over Dodd Frank.

#10 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-06-28 02:57 AM

The only thing more outrageous than a government that claims "of and for the people" instead forcing taxpaying citizens to defend their own interests from government that lies to prosecute its citizens. We need inherent rights that enable individuals rights (not corporations) to fairly supercede bureaucrats.

#11 | Posted by Robson at 2024-06-28 08:35 PM

@#11 ... We need inherent rights that enable individuals rights (not corporations) to fairly supercede bureaucrats. ...

And this relates to the topic at hand... how?

#12 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-06-28 08:48 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

SCOTUS Gives Presidents 'Absolute Immunity' for 'Official Acts' (208 comments)

An Experiment Doled Out Money to Homeless People in Denver (57 comments)

What SCOTUS Just Did by Overturning Chevron (38 comments)

Progressives Take Another 'L' (32 comments)

SCOTUS Completes the Biggest Power Grab in Modern US History (32 comments)

Video Shows NY Officer Fatally Shooting Teen on Ground. (27 comments)

Newspaper Urges Felon Trump to Exit Race (22 comments)

Far-right National Rally Leads France's Snap Poll (21 comments)