Who should be deciding whether a drug is safe, the scientists at the food and drug administration or judge Matthew Kazmaryk of the Fifth circuit?

Overturning settled law after settled law... Arrogance.

#5 | POSTED BY GALAXIEPETE

A power grab

ny time that power is taken away from unelected bureaucrats is a win for 'We The People'.

#8 | POSTED BY MSGT

lol

Do you have ANY clue as whom the power source s being transferred too?

Farking republicans too freaking stupid to live

Seriously how did you live to what ever age you are?

As to whom the power is being transferred

Fat fingers

Who should be deciding whether a drug is safe, the scientists at the food and drug administration or judge Matthew Kazmaryk of the Fifth circuit?

You people despise democracy.

#18 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER A

No jeff, we just despise corrupt, insurrectionist, rapist, conmen, liars.

You seem to have no problem with them.

Who should be deciding whether a drug is safe, the scientists at the food and drug administration or judge Matthew Kazmaryk of the Fifth circuit?

Justice Gorsuch can't tell the difference between a greenhouse gas and laughing gas. He will now be deciding questions of an incredibly complex technical nature.

You don't have a clue what ambiguity means in the real world.

See: Mifepristone

is a very positive thing for our country.

#21 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Who will benefit?

Polluters
Rich, rich people
Large corporations
Anti-vaxxers
Anti-workers
Large farm conglomerates
Elon Musk

Who will pay?

Average Americans

Drink that lead, baby!

Chevron was a pro-polluter decision at the time btw.

Any chance we'll get you to explain how you can enforce a law without interpreting it?

Any chance we'll get you to explain the difference between a police officer enforcing the law and a regulator specifically trained in the issue?

Any chance we'll get you to explain how removing authority from "unelected bureaucrats" to "unelected judges" is a "win for the people"?

Any chance we'll get you to explain how an unelected judge isn't an unelected bureaucrat?

Any chance we'll get you to answer the following question: Who should be deciding whether a drug is safe, the scientists at the food and drug administration or judge Matthew Kazmaryk of the Fifth circuit?

You clearly don't understand the issue lefthandedturd.

Here let me provide you with an example.

One of the arguments in the Mifepristone case that the plaintiffs made was that many of the approvals for Mifepristone by the FDA were not appropriate. They stated, without factual basis that Mifepristone was unsafe, they relied on some anti-reproductive freedom website posts by anonymous bloggers as "proof". 5th Circuit Judge Matthew Kazmaryk accepted that argument and put a stay on the use of Mifepristone. The stay was lifted by the SC until the argument was adjudicated. The SC found that the plaintiffs did not have standing. They did NOT comment on the merits of the case. Thus, if the standing issue hadn't played out OR if the SC decided not to hear the case, Mifepristone would have been outlawed due to a Federal Judge's interpretation of anonymous blog posts.

Mifepristone is safer than Tylenol.

These are the facts of the issue

A federal judge ordering a safe drug taken off the market due to anonymous posts.
Not science
Not the federal agency which studied the medicine

A federal judge.

But let's play out your hypothetical.

You are saying the FDA is run by large corporations.

Now the large corporations will just get the courts to do their bidding. So instead of scientists at the FDA making the approval, pharmaceutical companies will argue before a judge that the FDA is being a meanie and the federal judge-not the scientists at the FDA to approve the drug. The decision will be profit driven and not driven by safe science

I do not disagree that large corporations have too much sway on the regulatory agencies but the solution is NOT to farm out oversight to radical, partisan, corrupt judges. The solution is to properly fund and reform the agencies.

You have absolutely no right to talk about other people's healthcare choices.

#39 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Abortion has entered the chat