The U.S. Supreme Court has found Donald Trump enjoys complete immunity for clearly "official acts" he took while in office and at least "presumptive immunity" for other official acts as president. The decision did not grant immunity for unofficial acts. The justices sent the case back to a district court to review, making it less likely a trial happens before the presidential election. The vote was 6-3, and Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion. In a fiery dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the majority opinion "makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our Constitution and system of Government, that no man is above the law."
GFY Censored.
#15 | Posted by LauraMohr
Trump's "proposals would terminate Medicare and Medicaid funding for hospitals that provide gender-affirming care to trans youth, attempt to charge teachers with sex discrimination for affirming students' gender identities and order federal agencies to 'cease all programs that promote the concept of sex and gender transition at any age.' Trump also pledged to ask Congress to halt the use of federal funds to promote or pay for gender-affirming care, without distinguishing between care for adults or minors." www.them.us
But hey, at least we didn't have to tolerate Hillary or Al Gore presidencies. Thank you Green voters!
Some potentially useful email addresses and other poc methods:
The Perps
Federalist Society: info@fedsoc.org
ALEC: ldalseide@alec.org
Illinois GPO: info@illinois.gop
National GPO: info@gop.com
National Libertarian Party: info@lp.org
National Better Business Bureau: programs@bbbnp.org
Supreme Court POC: Have not found a direct email but there is a message form you can find by googling Supreme Court email.
If you have the courage to tell these vile people what you think of their new king. I will post what I sent but it is greater than the max message size here. Yes I am angry over the whole situation.
#152
Been a registered Libertarian forever, so that's my vote. Trump or Biden, not even at gunpoint.
""This chapter analyzes the constitutionality of the targeted killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S. citizen whom the executive branch believed to be a senior planner for AQAP (a regional branch of al-Qaeda), concluding that the Obama administration's claim that the killing was lawful is correct..."
academic.oup.com
#164 | POSTED BY CORKY"
You are linking to the wrong person -------. Obama intentionally droned this guy's 16 year old son in a completely separate strike. No one claims the 16 year old kid was linked to al-Qaeda and yet Obama murdered him anyway.
en.wikipedia.org's%20death.
"Abdulrahman Anwar al-Awlaki (also spelled al-Aulaqi, Arabic: ; August 26, 1995 " October 14, 2011) was a 16-year-old United States citizen who was killed by a U.S. drone strike in Yemen."
Obama didn't drone "the 16 year old".
- yav
He kinda did everything but pull the trigger.
The U.S. drone strike that killed Abdulrahman Anwar al-Awlaki was conducted under a policy approved by U.S. President Barack Obama
en.m.wikipedia.org
Drudge Retort Headlines
The President Can Now Assassinate You, Officially (165 comments)
Woman Fired for Refusing COVID Shot Wins Almost $700K (43 comments)
Ralph Nader just Tried to Pin Blame for SCOTUS Ruling on Hillary Clinton (42 comments)
Progressives Take Another 'L' (40 comments)
Trump Seeks to Overturn 34 Felony Convictions (33 comments)
AOC to File 'Articles of Impeachment' Following SCOTUS Immunity Ruling (29 comments)
Allan Lichtman: Democrats Should Not Replace Joe Biden (27 comments)
The Supreme Court Puts Trump Above the Law (24 comments)