Good Faith exclusion in the 4th Amendment:

"Good faith provides an exception to the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule barring the use at trial of evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful search and seizure. If officers had reasonable, good faith belief that they were acting according to legal authority, such as by relying on a search warrant that is later found to have been legally defective, the illegally seized evidence is admissible under this exception."

Arizona v. Evans

QCP

"The exclusion is BS"

Probably a little too subjective but if it protects the good guys just doing their job, and puts the bad guys in jail, I'm happy to let somebody wiser than either of us make that decision on a case by case level.

LAMP

For Good Faith Fourth Amendment purposes.

LAMP

I don't know. We're getting into the weeds here.

JPW

I've learned that it's foolish to argue with the Constitution. It says what it says until somebody changes it. And nothing that is said here is going to change it by arguing with each other.

I already said I think it's subjective. That's as far as I'm going to go.

So, carry on.