Saturday, October 12, 2024

What Real People Get About Kamala Harris' Big New Idea

This week Kamala Harris proposed to have Medicare cover in-home care for seniors and people with disabilities, in what would amount to a major expansion of the beloved federal health insurance program. And while it doesn't appear to have registered as such in the political conversation (more on that in a minute), her plan made an impression on a lot of everyday Americans who heard about it.

More

Comments

Medicare doesn't currently cover long-term care except in limited circumstances, and decent private coverage is almost impossible to find. That leaves Medicaid, which varies by state and requires people to impoverish themselves or transfer assets before they can qualify. Even then, it has limits on home care, often forcing people into nursing homes when they'd rather stay home.

Harris' solution is to make in-home care a regular Medicare benefit, available to all enrollees. Her campaign didn't provide a ton of detail - another reason, I suspect, the political world didn't pay a lot of attention. But the official release cited an independent study that sketched out what such a program could look like and estimated it would require about $40 billion a year in new federal spending.

Harris has suggested offsetting much of the cost with savings from another campaign proposal, one designed to reduce Medicare spending by extracting lower drug prices from manufacturers. Whether that would provide enough money and whether the fiscal tradeoffs are worthwhile are just some of the many questions Harris would have to answer if she were elected and able to pursue the proposal.

But whatever its very real pros and cons, the Harris plan represents one of the first serious, high-profile efforts to address a need that's likely to touch most families eventually, one way or another. That alone makes it worthy of more attention than it's gotten so far.

This could seriously be the issue this election turns on if/when it gets the spotlight it deserves. Millions of Americans on a daily basis are dealing with care issues regarding their grandparents, parents, siblings, children or friends who require more care than they're capable of providing for themselves. And it really doesn't matter how rich or poor one might be or whether you're Republican, Democrat, or none of the above; the stresses and pressures of finding a workable life balance when caring for someone else is incredibly hard for most people.

Extending Medicare services into this realm will unjokingly be a lifesaver for untold millions of caregivers and families all across America. Especially with all the aging Boomers, this policy should resonate with every generation following them. As much as it's a blessing to care for one's parents or grandparents, not everyone has the personal bandwidth to navigate the twists and turns of their own lives and take on the responsibility for a parent(s) no longer able to adequately take care of themselves on a daily basis.

#1 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-10-11 11:41 PM

OK, the substance of the article aside.

My first, and major concern, is the "real people" appellation in the title.

imo, that is just wrong.

So very wrong.

It is a denigration of those who have opposing views, much as fmr Pres Trump does so often.


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-13 01:02 AM

It is a denigration of those who have opposing views, much as fmr Pres Trump does so often.

You're completely misconstruing what the title means. The title is shortened because of the character limit. It should read:

What Real People Get About Kamala Harris' Big New Idea That The Political Set Can't Grasp

The title is meant to speak solely to the punditry/media class, not any other particular group and certainly not the majority of citizens. And the point of the title is that this proposal is life-altering for untold millions, yet it's not received any of the focus or publicity that Trump's demented rantings about removing taxes from overtime pay or making car loan interest deductible - things that are clear panders and will never be instituted by Congress.

The author is talking about the real-world ramifications of this policy idea for all those trying to navigate the now muddled up reality of figuring out how to provide care for the elderly without 1) Being forced to pay exorbitant amounts of money to provide adequate caregiving in private facilities - often expending whatever wealth the cared-for have accumulated, or paying for the care out of their own pockets if able to; 2) Try to provide caregiving in their own homes and/or the cared-for's home by paying for outside agencies to assist at least part time; 3) Wait until all the cared-for's life savings and wealth have been exhausted, at which time they may qualify for Medicaid assistance for long term care; none of which are particularly appetizing for most families dealing with these issues.

Lamp, you've been here long enough to know to check the linked article first if the posted title raises questions. I'm open if you've got an alternate title that at minimum provides a gist of what the article is about within 60 characters. I did the best I could.

#3 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-10-13 09:56 AM

ROFLMAO I should invest in hip waders. The crap is getting deap in here.

#4 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2024-10-13 10:15 AM


Lamp, you've been here long enough to know to check the linked article first if the posted title raises questions.

He claims he's an engineer, yet has none of the telltale signs of being one.

Medicare and most other health insurance, including Medicare Supplement Insurance (Medigap), don't pay for non-medical long-term care.

Besides " ... will never be instituted by Congress." This would still apply would it not? The POTUS can't just "implement" this via EO.

How many "real people" have the problems being described Tony? I know of no one having this issue. More people will be affected by car loan interest deductions than at home caregiving.

#5 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-10-13 10:15 AM

How many "real people" have the problems being described Tony? I know of no one having this issue. More people will be affected by car loan interest deductions than at home caregiving.

How many people have elderly parents and/or grandparents who can no longer live alone and who don't have the means to pay a home health care worker?

#6 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-10-13 10:25 AM

How many "real people" have the problems being described Tony? I know of no one having this issue.

That helps explain a lot about you, namely your ignorance on this topic and your seeming lack of understanding the struggles of others who aren't you.

Broadly speaking, 100 million US adults function as caregivers, providing care for a child, parent, or other relative. More narrowly, there are 53 million US adults who care for a spouse, elderly parent or relative, or special-needs child. That's up from 43.5 million in 2015, and includes caregivers who also work full-time jobs.

Since most (61%) US households are dependent on two incomes to remain financially stable, the implications of this increasing demand for loved ones to stand in as family caregivers would upset the financial balance of the average household in the most stable of economies. But, given recent inflation and other macroeconomic pressures, the growing demand for unpaid care increases the financial strain. On a macroeconomic level, the direct cost of caregiving on the US economy is nearly $44 billion, given the loss of more than 650,000 jobs and almost 800,000 individuals with absenteeism issues at work.

www.guardianlife.com

One day - hopefully - your parents will age into needing care beyond their ability to deliver it themselves. So ultimately, this is an everybody issue, regardless of all the other categories we place people into statistically. Everyone has a parent or parents.

#7 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-10-13 10:38 AM

The larger point is that caregiving is one of the ONLY issues Democrats, Republicans, and every other political or ideological persuasion are affected by the same. There is no ideological differences at issue with the need for caregiving.

With cost being the biggest impediment to any increase in government expenditures, if a funding mechanism can be agreed upon, there is no constituency in America that would not back this proposal on its face. Everyone has aging parents or relatives who'll need care services as they age, and as shown statistically above, American employers also pay when workers have to miss work because they're providing needed caregiving for loved ones.

#8 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-10-13 10:48 AM

"I know of no one having this issue."

Peak Republican.

#9 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-10-13 11:13 AM

Kamala Harris's proposal is going to be seen as such a necessary and logical extension of Medicare that Republicans will certainly fight it but it will be a huge defeat for them. Even the MAGAcrazies will realize the importance and it will destroy Trump and his death grip on the GQP, I know some Trump cult members who know tgeir incomes can't afford the cost of taking care of their parents so it looks .to me that those insane tax cuts passed by Bush and Trump re going to have to be reversed and those evil illegal immigrants are going to need training so they can take care of us in our later years; probably be wise to take some spannish lessons while we can still learn. I think I am going to, Like other things Republicans opposed when they need those things they suddenly think the government should provide those things. Immigtants are just mtrderers and rapists one day and caretakers the next.

#10 | Posted by danni at 2024-10-13 05:55 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

The Russia Hoax Is Still Not a Hoax (34 comments)

Trump Asks for Use of Military Jet with Anti-missile Defenses (21 comments)

FEMA Adds Misinformation to List of Disasters to Clean Up (19 comments)

Trump's Latest Incomprehensible Stream of Consciousness (15 comments)

Rumors on X Are Becoming the Right's New Reality (15 comments)

I'm Running Out of Ways to Explain How Bad This Is (15 comments)

Trump Is Still Seething Over Obama's Nobel Prize (13 comments)

Israel Attacks UN Base in Lebanon Twice in 48 Hours (13 comments)