Thursday, November 14, 2024

US Labor Board Bans Mandatory Anti-union Meetings

Amazon.com made unlawful promises and threats during mandatory meetings to discourage unionizing at a New York City warehouse, a U.S. labor board said on Wednesday while banning employers from holding such meetings moving forward.

More

Comments

More from the article...

... The National Labor Relations Board said that so-called "captive audience meetings," which have been legal for decades and are routine during union campaigns, illegally interfere with workers' rights to freely choose whether or not to unionize.

Employers can lawfully hold meetings to discuss unionizing if they are voluntary, workers are given advance notice of subjects to be discussed, and no attendance records are kept, said the board, whose members are appointed by the president. The board currently has a majority of Democratic appointees.

The NLRB said that Amazon managers solicited grievances and made implied promises to remedy them if workers rejected the union during mandatory meetings at the Staten Island warehouse known as JFK8 ahead of a 2022 union election. At other meetings, managers illegally threatened to withhold raises and benefits if the warehouse unionized, according to the decision.

Amazon also removed union-related posts on an internet message board and threatened to discipline a JFK8 employee if she re-posted them, the board found. ...

The decision could also be overturned by the board when it gains a Republican majority, as the agency often reverses itself after changes in leadership. President-elect Donald Trump could have a Republican-led board in place as soon as next year. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-11-14 12:30 PM

@#1 ... The decision could also be overturned by the board when it gains a Republican majority, as the agency often reverses itself after changes in leadership. President-elect Donald Trump could have a Republican-led board in place as soon as next year. ...

But the Pres-elect Trump administration is pro-worker, so it wouldn't overturn the ruling, right?

#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-11-14 12:31 PM

...so it wouldn't overturn the ruling, right?

So fast it will make your head spin.

#3 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-11-14 02:24 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Trump Picks Matt Gaetz as Attorney General (240 comments)

Trump Picks Fox News Host for Defense Secretary (175 comments)

Trump Picks Musk, Ramaswamy for Government Efficiency Effort (48 comments)

Trump to Launch Massive Attack Against Higher Education (42 comments)

The End of America's Well-Intentioned Empire (40 comments)

Trump Taps Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence (25 comments)

Guardian no Longer Posting on X (23 comments)

2024's Other Big Loser -- Mainstream Media (21 comments)

Scientists Warn That a Key Atlantic Current Could Collapse (16 comments)

Warren: Trump Transition 'already Breaking the Law' (15 comments)