The concern trolling is top notch.

Eberly is Jeff's *itch.

why did the Obama's buy coastal property?

Why not?

Buying costal property and believing in climate change aren't mutually exclusive.

Fighting to slow down climate change and trying to combat climate change are worthy efforts.

I'm not expecting people to start living like the Amish just because they believe we need to find solutions to the results of industrialization and mass production.

Alternatives to plastic, reducing the need for lumber, processing byproducts of manufacturing so we're not dumping waste into our environment ...

There's things that can be done.

The notion the Obamas are hypocrites for living in costal property is a lie spread by morons like 1TRUMPSLUT because its easy to gaslight idiots with such stupid statements.

Anybody who lives with a huge carbon footprint in an area vulnerable to devastating disasters ...

What areas aren't vulnerable to devastating disasters?

Whether is floods or tornadoes or hurricanes or earthquakes or fires or freezing, everywhere has its issues.

Fact is. Obama is being called out because Obama haters think by pointing out he's living in a costal community, it negates the threat of climate change.

It doesn't.

I've been living in California my whole life and never has there been a fire in the pacific palisades, let alone something like what just happened.

Are you going to pretend anyone knew such a catastrophe would occur.

Are you pretending natural devastation is just isolated to the coasts?

Makes perfect sense to be upset with Trump for the fires.
#106 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

Trump has used the fires to attack Democrats in the state of California.

While every other president in my life time, and I'd wager everyone's lifetime, has tried their best to bring Americans together during times of crisis and tragedy.

Trump uses them to create division and instability in our society.

The man has but one objective, destroy the United States of America.

Read your article, it make no specific mentions of that area.

It talk about Los Angeles in general and drought compared to last year.

It talks about climate change and temperatures rising.

But I read nothing that states the palisades were an area of concern.

Besides Altadena, another location in Los Angeles which has been hit very hard by fire over the past week and has caused significant loss of homes, is inland, not costal. It's not getting the attention the palisades are because it's not the uber wealthy living there.

So what about them?

I mean. Clearly no one cares. They're not rich enough to receive attention by the media.

But trust me when I say, it means a lot to people living here. These fires have burnt down homes of people we know and love.

And while this is all a bunch of hypotheticals and trolling for assh*les living in other states. It's real and painful for people living here.

Agreed but did you believe that during Katrina?
#140 | POSTED BY EBERLY

When? During my presidency?

#146

My friend moved to Minnesota because the area he lived in was prone to wild fires and he's no climate scientist.

What's your point?

since these fires are occurring in that area ... ... it's pretty much on point.
#147 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Considering there are wildfires in California every year?

It's almost like republicans are finally learning out about climate change since they can attack California and democrats with their new found knowledge.

My post:

While every other president in my life time, and I'd wager everyone's lifetime, has tried their best to bring Americans together during times of crisis and tragedy.
Trump uses them to create division and instability in our society.

Eberly's response:

you were screaming "GEORGE BUSH HATES BLACK PEOPLE"

You really are an idiot.

As a new comer,
#144 | POSTED BY 1INCEL

Finally hit puberty?

As someone who has been using X more often since discovering its a great source for free porn.

Their top stories are all about the fires and very critical of the democratic leadership.

So it's no surprise seeing so many Musketeers posting the same bullshht here that I see on there.

1MUSKDICKSUCKER is pretty much just copying stories form there and posting them on the DR.

That clip is one of the funniest things I've seen.

The Mike Myers and Chris Tucker were left stunned.

POSTED BY THEMAJORKONG

You idiots get dummer every day.

You were and you know it.

Eberly conflates the word of the president of the United States with the words of the people in the streets.

Because he's desperate to defend Trump's statements.

Just threw in the towel ...
#169 | POSTED BY EBERLY

You sure did.

The fact I pointed out in cases of crisis and tragedy Presidents try to unite the nation seems to have really thrown sand in Eberly's gash.

What a cranky *itch he is.

Let be honest.

To assume anything I say has the same significance as what the President of the United States says is absurd.

But it's what Eberly feels he has to do in order to defend Trump.

Even if it's bringing up what people said in 2005 in response to the federal government's response to the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

It's the same as Trump spending every moment since the fires started attacking California, democrats, the victims, and anyone else he could.

Because you're lying.

Then it should be easy for you to prove I'm lying.

Name a president who has used a tragedy to attack the other party.

Obama? BushJr? Clinton? BushSr? Reagan? Carter? Someone before him?

You're so desperate to have a point you're not even reading my post. Just attacking, because you don't have anything else to say.

Oh yea. I forgot Biden.

Did Biden use the hurricanes to attack DeSantis or the governor of North Carolina?

Laura is doing just fine feeding you your horse shht.

Eberly.

You should go ask your wife to wipe the sand out of your swollen gash and then go to sleep.

You're clearly not having a good day.

Everyone was chomping at the bit to go after DeSantis after every hurricane.
#191 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

It's amazing.

It's so difficult for you Deplorable Trumpers to just admit he's a piece of shht.

Even when the statement is as simple as:

"While every other president in my life time, and I'd wager everyone's lifetime, has tried their best to bring Americans together during times of crisis and tragedy.
Trump uses them to create division and instability in our society."

Your only response is to attack me or bring up "everyone".

Yet, no apparent concern by the rich lefties who own coastal property.
#188 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

This is such a partisan issue for you, you can't even fathom how many Trump voters lived in the Palisades.

-----
#201 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Eat me.

If you're not Amish, you don't care about climate change.
-Eberly

Myers and Tucker handled that really well.
#205 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

Hahaha!

I mean. Mayer was speechless and Tucker's eyes were popping out of his head.

But agreed. They handled it as best as they could.

You can say a lot about George W Bush, but I don't think "he doesn't care about black people" is one of them.

I remember it.

There were people stranded on their rooftops for days before they were rescued.

In response, people were saying it was because BushJr didn't care about black people. But in reality it was because they were poor.

In November there was a fire in Ventura county that burnt 20 thousand acres and hundreds of buildings, but it got zero attention.

There are currently 4 other fires burning in Los Angeles county, the Altadena fire has been devastating, but we're all talking about the one in the Palisades, along the coast.

Because it affects rich people.

I think W genuinely does care about Americans, but not Iraqis...
#211 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

Despite everything I disliked about BushJr.

There was never a point I felt like he was attacking America.

Despite everything I've heard about Reagan, I never heard he tried to tear this nation apart.

I've never heard of republican presidents attacking states or individuals or Americans.

They've always seemed to be above such behavior.

At least publicly.

I have been talking about the fires in the LA area, not any specific fire.
#212 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

Wasn't trying to call out anyone specifically.

It's just all the "fire hydrants are out of water" and "why isn't anyone using ocean water" and "what about the reservoir" are all specific to the Palisades fire.

Also. The winds on the first night were so strong firefighters ouldnt do anything. But now, instead of focusing on the fire and helping people, there also all this attention being placed on who to blame.

It's ridiculous.

You mean our 51st state?

I think anybody who lives along the coast is probably a climate change denier.

You're entitled to your opinion.

But a lot of climate change activists who are wealthy live wherever they want.

Again. Combating climate change doesn't mean you have to become Amish.

Being an activist means you try to pass laws that everyone hates like paper straws.

I hate paper straws.

Oops. I meant.

Being an activist means you try to pass laws to regulate industry and help slow climate change.

The problem is. Unless China and India also follow suit. None of it really matters.

America is actually doing a good job at combatting climate change.