So fact checkers that do it for free are more objective? come on.

I don't believe that's whats he said, this is why I suspect most of what you post, you don't read and understand what people are saying.

What he wants is that they are paid, but not by fact checking content which paints a negative narrative over their employer.

On topic, IDK about corruption, but $750K for a position in the government seems a bit much. How difficult could this position be over say governor?

So idk what this is, but certainly its part of the issue:
- An illegal immigrant was arrested by citizens lighting xmas trees in the trash on fire, not the police.
- He was already on probation, meaning he had already been arrested before the LA Fires, by the police.
- During the LA fires, he was caught near a fire, with a blowtorch.
- He's not being charged by the police with arson due to lack of "probable cause".
- He won't be deported because of California's sanctuary laws, and most likely will just be released back into the city.
- Yesterday, Gavin Newsom committed close to $50m of taxpayer money to protect illegal immigrants from deportation.

People here claiming drone pilots should be executed.

What about an arsonist, whats the rational to let him loose out on the streets AGAIN?

I'll let bellringer answer. You can't even do it right for yourself.
#14 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

You can't even read a budget Alex, you cut and past narrative generators.