"Where was all this energy when they attacked kids at a peace festival?"

Which attack are you referring to:

When Hamas attacked with foot soldiers on mopeds.

Or when IDF showed up and finished off the survivors with tanks and helicopter gunships.

You're calling me a liar?

Cute.

You're the liar.

I really thought you could tell truth from fiction.

I really did.

Show me.
#9 | Posted by boaz

Open your eyes, ------.

"It's a friendly fire accident, happens a lot in combat, more than you think."

Wow, dude. Are you really this dumb?
It was not an accident.
It wasn an order.

Boaz, read this sentence again and tell us how it was an accident. that the IDF followed the orders they were given:

"ordered all units to prevent the capture of Israeli citizens "at any cost" -- even by firing on them."

You really are a stupid fat ----.

"Those articles you cite are pro hamas "

Then why can't you cite any articles saying IDF didn't deliberately kill Israelis on Oct 7?
It's Because of how ------- stupid you are, Boaz.

Either you're too stupid to find them, or you're too stupid to see the truth.
Now which is it?

The questions got too hard for Low Bandwidth Boaz.

But he'll be back later, to be stupid at us again.

It's how he Owns The Libs.

"Then why can't you cite any articles saying IDF didn't deliberately kill Israelis on Oct 7?"
"The investigation is still ongoing."

What a surprise, you can't cite that article either! You absolutely cannot cite any article stating IDF did not kill Israelis on that day, because not even IDF is denying it. As you said, they are investigating it.

Don't you remember the pictures from the Kibbutz along the border, with the buildings showing blast damage consistent with heavy munitions? How, in your military educated mind, do you think the Hamas foot soldiers with AKs did that kind of damage?

You know damn well the only things in theater that day that can do that kind of damage is IDF tanks and gunships.
You stupid bitch.

"And BTW,
If Hamas had not attacked, would those people be dead?"

Some of them.
If IDF had not ordered Hannibal, the rest would be alive.

You are one stubborn bitch. Your ancestors sure were well-bred for that quality!

So who's fault is it really? You never take any responsibility for Hamas, do you?

Hamas bears responsibility for the things Hamas did.
IDF bears responsibility for the things IDF did.

Whose fault is it really, when you come home from work and dinner isn't on the table and so you have to smack down your bitch to teach her a lesson?
You're such a ------- tool.

"What? Are you serious? Are you even in the present world?"

You remember when IDF shot the three Israeli hostages who had escaped Hamas? Who shot those three Israeli hostages, Boaz? You're such a basket case, you can't even say it! I can only assume you were better at following orders than thinking for yourself, because you're impotent when it comes to thinking.

"What a ------ person."

Yeah I don't go around killing brown boys for a living. What a piece of ---- I am.

Boaz, we can sort this out very easily.

If you were IDF on October 7, and the Hannibal order came down:
Would you have fired on the Israeli kibbutzniks, from the safety of your helicopter, rather than risk their capture by Hamas?

You know your answer is Yes, you would have followed the Hannibal Order.
Fact is, you can't wait to Hannibal most of the blacks in your neighborhood.
You used to openly daydream about it.

Then why can't you cite any articles saying IDF didn't deliberately kill Israelis on Oct 7?
The investigation is still ongoing.
#22 | Posted by boaz

No. You're probably not lying, you're probably just mis-informed.
The investigation is not ongoing, and there will not be an investigation.
And the entire world accepts that Israel killed their own people, except for cretins like you.
Why is it always this way with you? It's because you like being told what to think. Obedience to the state make you feel safe.

IDF ordered Hannibal, it resulted in a non-trivial number of dead Israelis, and IDF leadership decided "it would not be morally sound to investigate these incidents."

"A tank then arrived and fired on the house full of the hostages."

Boaz can't accept that IDF is responsible, even though IDF can:

Brig. Gen. Barak Hiram admitted he had ordered the tank to fire at the house, knowing that it contained both Israeli civilians and Palestinian militants, "even at the cost of civilian casualties."[18]

If there was no Hannibal Directive there would be no need to have a tank kill the hostages dumbass.

And if you want to play that game Boaz,

If there was no Israel, there would be no Hamas!