"The president's lawyers concede he is not immune from the 34 felonies themselves, but they contend that prosecutors improperly included immunized evidence during the trial, like a White House aide's testimony and Trump's social media posts."

o

"The appeals panel is not expected to conclusively resolve in their ruling how immunity applies. At this stage, Trump just needs to show it is a "colorable" " meaning plausible " defense.

But it remains unclear following the oral argument whether the panel was convinced he clears even that lower standard.

"Was there another case in which an evidentiary immunity related to a federal, or is claimed as a federal defense, has served as a basis for removal?" asked Judge Susan Carney, an appointee of former President Obama."

much more at the link