"The president's lawyers concede he is not immune from the 34 felonies themselves, but they contend that prosecutors improperly included immunized evidence during the trial, like a White House aide's testimony and Trump's social media posts."

o

"The appeals panel is not expected to conclusively resolve in their ruling how immunity applies. At this stage, Trump just needs to show it is a "colorable" " meaning plausible " defense.

But it remains unclear following the oral argument whether the panel was convinced he clears even that lower standard.

"Was there another case in which an evidentiary immunity related to a federal, or is claimed as a federal defense, has served as a basis for removal?" asked Judge Susan Carney, an appointee of former President Obama."

much more at the link

Wonder if all Republicans will show up at the Courthouse in red ties again?