It's Epstein All Over Again on Trump and the Boat Strikes Video

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

If there is nothing truly damaging to President Donald Trump in the Jeffrey Epstein files, he and his administration did a great job of making it look like there could be.

Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 06:31 PM | 16 COMMENTS | permalink

Release the boat strike video.

[image or embed]
-- Rep. Ted Lieu (@reptedlieu.bsky.social) Dec 6, 2025 at 6:15 PM

Comments

The core questions according to the article:

What would be so sensitive about the portion that shows a second set of strikes that wasn't sensitive about the initial strikes? And why has it taken nearly a week to review that release, when it took just hours to review the release of the initial strikes?

#1 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-12-09 03:56 PM

Murder has No Statute of limitations.

Trump may get SCOTUS to say he's immune from prosecution.

The other clowns in the chain of command have no such immunity.

Sleep tight --------.

#2 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-12-09 04:08 PM

The second strike is a Democrat Hoax!

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-09 04:56 PM

What would be so sensitive about the portion that shows a second set of strikes that wasn't sensitive about the initial strikes?

#1 | POSTED BY DOC_SARVIS

The survivors were trying to surrender.

#4 | Posted by Zed at 2025-12-09 05:58 PM

The Epstein Files and the Boat Videos together emphasize that Donald Trump is a murderous pervert.

#5 | Posted by Zed at 2025-12-09 06:07 PM

"I would like Trump and Hegseth to make it last a long time so they lose a limb and bleed out a little. Like I'm having a really different time having sympathy for these guys who 10 seconds earlier were almost taken out by the initial bomb but because they managed to get ejected a little too soon had to be taken out in the water. I realize legally it might make a difference but truly it's a tough case to get sympathy from the American people"
--Megyn Kelly, saying the quiet part out loud.
www.latintimes.com

#6 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-09 06:10 PM

I saw the vid of her saying that the other day. Utterly chilling to watch the quite part being said out loud in a, 'couldn't give less of a ---' manner.

www.youtube.com

yt short

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-09 06:26 PM

The Banality of Evil.

#8 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-12-09 06:33 PM

5. Bonus points for "emphasize . . . murderous pervert."

#9 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-12-09 08:47 PM

Megyn Kelly, saying the quiet part out loud.

I long knew the US was chock full of hateful racist homophobic and bigoted people who walk around and called themselves patriots and christians, but I never expected just how easily it would be for them to slither out from under their rocks and do so publicly.

It's almost like who can be the biggest ass**** publicly like their is some FIFA medal prize for doing so.

It is really telling just how easily this person could go from racist to offended by misogyny and then back into racist troll so quickly for money.

No honor, no integrity, no morals.

#10 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-12-10 08:40 AM

Of course Trump can't be held liable. No President has for strikes killing innocent people.

Do you need help researching?

Here's a starter: three killed in Chinese Embassy.

How about the wedding party killed.

#11 | Posted by Petrous at 2025-12-10 10:21 AM

Did anyone go to jail for those deaths in the military?

#12 | Posted by Petrous at 2025-12-10 10:22 AM

"Of course Trump can't be held liable."

There's a difference between
Can't be held liable and
Won't be held liable.

The difference is Republicans.

#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-10 05:25 PM

@#11 ... Of course Trump can't be held liable. ...

Then why is Pres Trump messing with the ICC?

US threatens new ICC sanctions unless court pledges not to prosecute Trump
www.reuters.com

#14 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-10 06:47 PM

@#1 ... The core questions according to the article:

What would be so sensitive about the portion that shows a second set of strikes that wasn't sensitive about the initial strikes?

And why has it taken nearly a week to review that release, when it took just hours to review the release of the initial strikes? ...

Yup.

Also, if I may add, Sen Cotton has been saying things along the lines of ~the survivors of the initial strike trying to turn the boat over and continue on their mission.~

If that were the case, does that not inherently criticize the capability of the munition used to take out that boat?

Asked differently, if there actually were enough flotsam remaining of the boat for the two to continue their mission, either the munition was too weak for the task (imo, doubtful), or the munition missed the boat (also doubtful, as the initial video showed).

Could Sen Cotton be trying to mischaracterize what happened leading up to the second strike to protect Pres Trump?

#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-10 07:04 PM

Who's "epstein"?

#16 | Posted by sit_goodboy at 2025-12-10 07:04 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

ICE Arrests 75,000 People with No Criminal Records (67 comments)

Fox News Freaks Out Over Mamdani Telling Immigrants Their Rights (62 comments)

Trump Unveils $12 billion Aid for Farmers Hit by His Tariffs (56 comments)

'It's happening much faster' (38 comments)

Just 0.001% Hold Three Times the Wealth of Poorest Half of Humanity: Report (37 comments)