How many DEI programs have you experienced personally, JeffJ?

"mandated ideological conformity"

This is just Karl Popper's Paradox oF Tolerance turned on its head.
To Republicans, ideological conformity is when you aren't allowed to say people from Somalia are shistain people.
Expecting people to behave in a civil manner towards one another is the tyranny of ideological conformity.
To wit:

---
The training featured a slideshow and a series of cartoon videos about "systemic racism" and "understanding white supremacy." Attendees were told that "systems of oppression" were "woven" into the "very foundation of America," and that white supremacy is a "highly descriptive term for the culture we live in." Trainees were directed to break into small groups to discuss these concepts before returning to a larger group discussion, where they were told that, if they didn't speak, they would get called upon.
---

You'd have to be immensely racist to be an armchair Constitutional Scholar who knows that slaves were counted as 3/5 of a person for representation purposes only, thus taking power from the free states and giving it to the slave states, and deny that "systems of oppression" were "woven" into the "very foundation of America."

Do you deny that systems of oppression were woven into the very foundation of America, my little pumpkin?

"white supremacy is a "highly descriptive term for the culture we live in."

I don't see how anyone can argue with this either.
Blacks are 13% of the population and 2% of our Presidents.

White households had a median net worth of $284,000 in 2022
Black households: Median net worth was $44,000 in 2022

One of those groups has a significant financial advantage over the other.

Maybe you'd prefer if they called it White Dominance? White Superiority?

"On compelled speech, the opinion confronts the reality of those "correct answer" modules. A format that prevents employees from proceeding unless they pick the government-approved answer "forced acceptance or adoption of the school district's views." "

Okay.
So now when the math teacher insists two plus two equals four, they "forced acceptance or adoption of the school district's views."
When the history teacher says the Civil War was about slavery, they "forced acceptance or adoption of the school district's views."

And I'm guessing that's okay with the judge, because students aren't workers and don't have the kinds of legal protections we only give to workers.

"DEI regimes don't just chill speech in the training room; they chill it in the courthouse."

NO they don't.

"Judge Ralph Erickson begins with a reminder: "It is important to note at the outset what this case is not about." The court isn't grading the district's politics or even deciding whether all DEI trainings are unlawful"

Why do you think this subject is trolling.

Because you're using this example of a DEI program that brushed up against workplace protections, to say all DEI is bad.

Actually your article does that in the sentence I quoted at the top of #12.

"Government can train employees on lawful duties and express its own views; it cannot demand that private citizens agree with those views as the price of employment."

But a private company could. This raises a Fourth Amendment issue ONLY because the employer here is the government.

And that has nothing to do with DEI.

And this DEI module would be legal for any non-government employer.

And I don't think you understand that.

Sorry, not Fourth Amendment. First Amendment.

"People who aren't respected get ignored."

Or corrected.