Thursday, February 19, 2026

DOJ Removed FBI Interviews with Underage Trump Victim

The FBI spoke at least four times with a woman who credibly accused Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was a minor, Trump-Epstein files show. That document is no longer accessible on the DOJ website.

Posted by qcp at 09:20 AM | 25 COMMENTS | permalink

Comments

The FBI spoke at least four times with a woman who credibly accused Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was a minor, Trumpstein files show. That document is no longer accessible on the DOJ website.

That's awfully curious.

#1 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-19 09:40 AM

Curiouser and curiouser.

#2 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-02-19 10:21 AM

Supporters of the child-raping orange -------- will be scarce on this thread.

#3 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-19 11:23 AM

Supporters of the child-raping orange -------- will be scarce on this thread.

#3 | POSTED BY REINHEITSGEBOT

They'll say it's unfair not to discuss monsters who are not Trump.

#4 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-19 11:26 AM

They removed it because Trump has already been
Totally Exonerated.

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 11:29 AM

FTA

But "credible" doesn't mean the woman's claims were verified, or even that they could be independently verified " which her initial interview suggests may be impossible, since she did not memorialize the abuse in writing when it happened to her, as early as age 13. And it doesn't mean the DOJ believed it could seek charges because of her claims alone, especially since they'd need her to cooperate as a witness if they did want to bring charges.

#6 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-02-19 11:52 AM

The former underage teen who told the FBI she'd been sexually assaulted by Donald Trump, according to the Epstein files, included matching claims against an unidentified "prominent, wealthy" man from New York in the sexual assault and trafficking complaint she first brought against Jeffery Epstein's estate in 2019.

The accusation's presence in the complaint, which has apparently not yet been reported, is additionally significant because it means the woman " identified in the lawsuit as Jane Doe 4 " was aware she might have to testify under oath about those very claims. (She also gave four formal FBI interviews, where it's a crime to make false statements.).

Does this victim resemble Ivanka?

#7 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-19 11:59 AM

"But "credible" doesn't mean the woman's claims were verified"
#6 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Why aren't the files available any longer?
That doesn't look like a cover-up to you?

Come on, man.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 12:00 PM

""credible" doesn't mean the woman's claims were verified"

You're right. It just means "Based on this evidence, and this perpetrator...it's mighty damned likely."

#9 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-19 12:01 PM

""credible" doesn't mean the woman's claims were verified"

Instead of saying what credible doesn't mean,

Tell us what a credible rape claim actually means.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 12:04 PM

Tell us what a credible rape claim actually means.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 12:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

IF you read any of that you would know it means she, at a minimum, must cooperate as a witness to the claim.

#11 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-02-19 12:07 PM

"IF you read any of that you would know it means she, at a minimum, must cooperate as a witness to the claim."

You just basically said rape is allowable, if you can silence the victim.

Republican Family Values!

#12 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-19 12:14 PM

IF you read any of that you would know it means she, at a minimum, must cooperate as a witness to the claim.
#11 | Posted by lfthndthrds

^
This was described as a "woman who credibly accused Trump."

So are you now saying that's false? This woman did not credibly accuse Trump?

#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 12:15 PM

You guys are arguing with someone who is making excuses for a man who raped children. Plonk them.

#14 | Posted by qcp at 2026-02-19 01:18 PM

You just basically said rape is allowable, if you can silence the victim.

Republican Family Values!

#12 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-19 12:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

No I didn't you ------- fruit loop.They didn't pursue it because they couldn't verify the story and she wasn't cooperating - probably because someone was coaching her to take the Jussie Smollett low road.

#15 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-02-19 03:03 PM

So are you now saying that's false? This woman did not credibly accuse Trump?

#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 12:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

I didn't "say" anything, I simply pointed out what the article said. You morons get angry when your schitty articles fall apart on you - and that's not my fault.

#16 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-02-19 03:05 PM

You guys are arguing with someone who is making excuses for a man who raped children. Plonk them.

#14 | Posted by qcp at 2026-02-19 01:18 PM | Reply | Flag:

No, they're arguing for the sake of making the article say something other than what it says. You still taking up for shower daddy?

#17 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-02-19 03:06 PM

I didn't "say" anything
#17 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You were equivocating about what "credible" means.

The FBI spoke at least four times with a woman who credibly accused Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was a minor.

"Credibly accused Trump of sexually assaulting her"

"Credibly."

True or false?

You didn't say anything.
And you're not gonna.

#18 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 03:17 PM

"They didn't pursue it because they couldn't verify the story and she wasn't cooperating"

If that's true, that would be in the actual documents.

But the DOJ removed those documents.

Why did DOJ remove the documents that would actually substantiate what you are saying?

You'll never say.

#19 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 03:20 PM

Why did DOJ remove the documents that would actually substantiate what you are saying?

You'll never say.

#19 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 03:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

Who removed the file? And why? Do you know? No, you don't know anything more than you knew before you tried to use this nonsense as a gotcha piece. But one thing is for sure, no one believed her because she wouldn't cooperate and her story lacked anything of substance. Now back to young Ashley's diary.....

#20 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-02-19 04:10 PM

You didn't say anything.
And you're not gonna.

#18 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 03:17 PM | Reply | Flag:

I don't have to, the schitty hit piece said it all. The moron who wrote it had to cover his own @$$.

#21 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-02-19 04:12 PM

Now back to young Ashley's diary.....
#20 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTURDS

What a creepy, pedophilic thing to say.

Gross.

Side note, Joe Biden's name isn't in the Epstein files.

Womp womp.

#22 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-19 04:12 PM

"I don't have to, the schitty hit piece said it all. The moron who wrote it had to cover his own @$$."

Say what now?

"DOJ Removed Record of Multiple FBI Interviews with Underage Trump Accuser, Epstein Data Shows"

Are you saying that's not true?

"the FBI found her to be credible in 2019, and six years later included her allegation as a bullet point in a comprehensive internal presentation about the Epstein and Maxwell case history, assembled last summer."

So why has that report been removed from the Epstein Files?

You will never answer that question. I know you will never answer. You know you will never answer too.

#23 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 05:42 PM

"No I didn't you ------- fruit loop."

What a riot.

Reread your post as often as it takes to understand the meaning and "logic" behind it. Your conclusion was if you can frighten her into silence, rape away!

#24 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-20 12:58 PM

Who is they? Who didn't prosecute Trump? Who didn't?

Biden and all prior admins. Credible except for Biden's DOJ.

Seems the Dems wanted Trump in the WH.

#25 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-02-20 02:08 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Netanyahu Blames Social Media for Israel's Crumbling Support (71 comments)

Mamdani Slams Israeli Land Grab Event (58 comments)

Republicans Would Rather Self-destruct Than Save Themselves (23 comments)

Checkmate in Iran (16 comments)

US Intelligence-Gathering Flights Are Surging Off Cuba (13 comments)

Consumer Prices Rose 3.8% Annually in April (12 comments)

Poll: Too Much Money in U.S. Politics (11 comments)

CEO Pay Grew 20 Times Faster Than Workers' Wages (10 comments)

Make Beef Importers Great Again (9 comments)

China Views Trump's US as Empire in Decline (8 comments)