FTA

But "credible" doesn't mean the woman's claims were verified, or even that they could be independently verified " which her initial interview suggests may be impossible, since she did not memorialize the abuse in writing when it happened to her, as early as age 13. And it doesn't mean the DOJ believed it could seek charges because of her claims alone, especially since they'd need her to cooperate as a witness if they did want to bring charges.

Tell us what a credible rape claim actually means.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 12:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

IF you read any of that you would know it means she, at a minimum, must cooperate as a witness to the claim.

You just basically said rape is allowable, if you can silence the victim.

Republican Family Values!

#12 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-19 12:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

No I didn't you fukking fruit loop.They didn't pursue it because they couldn't verify the story and she wasn't cooperating - probably because someone was coaching her to take the Jussie Smollett low road.

So are you now saying that's false? This woman did not credibly accuse Trump?

#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-19 12:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

I didn't "say" anything, I simply pointed out what the article said. You morons get angry when your schitty articles fall apart on you - and that's not my fault.

You guys are arguing with someone who is making excuses for a man who raped children. Plonk them.

#14 | Posted by qcp at 2026-02-19 01:18 PM | Reply | Flag:

No, they're arguing for the sake of making the article say something other than what it says. You still taking up for shower daddy?