The war on Iran has coincided with the release of large troves of government files that documented the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's ties to rich and powerful people in the US.
Let's be clear we are losing this war. War's need objectives that achieve a strategic goal. We have neither goals nor objectives. Taking any and all justifications and reasons by the Trump administration results in a basic concept of getting Iran to quit. That could take the form of so decisively defeating their military that their will collapses and they unconditionally surrender OR It means the Iranian regime collapses and is replaced by a new group that is open to accepting US requirements. Iran descending into an Iraq like civil war would achieve neither of those aims. Dead enders would lash out continuing the war. If I am missing something let me know. The problem is neither of the goals is achievable.
@#19 ... It's worse than that.
No quarter is refusing to accept the surrender of non-combatants. ...
OK, that led me to explore ...
No quarter ...
Analysts say US threat of 'no quarter' for Iran violates international law
www.aljazeera.com
... Rights groups have slammed United States Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth for saying that "no quarter" will be shown to Iran, as the US and Israel continue their military campaign against the country.
"We will keep pressing. We will keep pushing, keep advancing. No quarter, no mercy for our enemies," Hegseth told reporters on Friday.
Under the Hague Convention and other international treaties, it is illegal to threaten that no quarter will be given.
Domestic laws, such as the 1996 War Crimes Act, also prohibit such policies. US military manuals likewise warn that threats of "no quarter" are illegal.
Brian Finucane, a senior adviser at the International Crisis Group, a think tank, said Hegseth's comments appear to run afoul of those standards.
"These comments are very striking," Finucane told Al Jazeera over a phone call. "It raises questions about whether this belligerent, lawless rhetoric is being translated into how the war is being conducted on the battlefield."
But Hegseth has publicly dismissed concerns about international law, claiming he would abide no "stupid rules of engagement" and no "politically correct wars". ...
Drudge Retort Headlines
Trump's Iranian Nightmare (34 comments)
Roberts Issues Warning on SCOTUS Overruling Precedent (34 comments)
New York Mayor Mamdani Marks Nakba Day (22 comments)
Young Woman Fueling Trump's Wild Midnight Sprees Is Exposed (15 comments)
Trump 'On Verge of Massive Error With China Deal' (14 comments)
Trump: 'I don't think about Americans' financial situation' (14 comments)
Bulgaria Wins Eurovision Amid Protests Against Israel (13 comments)
The AARP Hates All My Favorite Foods (13 comments)
Trump's Border Patrol Chief Resigns (12 comments)
America in Free Fall (10 comments)