Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, February 09, 2025

President Trump has amended his lawsuit against CBS, demanding $20 billion and again claiming the network deceptively edited a "60 Minutes" interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris ...

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Trump is demanding that 60 Minutes be taken off the air. We cannot over estimate how dangerous it is to have the president demanding punishment for journalism he doesn't like. Trump wants to be a dictator and is proving it faster than I expected. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025 ...

[image or embed]

-- Michael J. Stern (@michaeljstern.bsky.social) February 7, 2025 at 10:35 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Lesley Stahl should sue Doe 174 for being a colossal gash.

#1 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-02-09 10:01 AM | Reply

Possibly related?

Trump megadonor gives SCOTUS opening to overturn landmark press freedom case
www.courthousenews.com

... First Amendment advocates warn that eliminating such protections for the press could turn libel lawsuits into weapons of political suppression.

Casino mogul and Trump megadonor Steve Wynn has created an opening for the Supreme Court to overturn a six-decade-old press freedom ruling.

It's an opening that several justices have been searching for -- and one that conservative Justice Clarence Thomas has even explicitly requested in his writings from the bench.

For 61 years, New York Times v. Sullivan has allowed the press to report on public figures without the threat of costly libel suits. A bedrock of modern libel law and one of the Supreme Court's most significant First Amendment rulings, the landmark 1964 decision says public officials must show actual malice to prevail in a libel suit.

More recently, some conservative legal scholars and media critics have pushed to overturn Sullivan to make it easier to sue the press.

Wynn says the Supreme Court should use his lawsuit against the Associated Press to do so. ...


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-02-09 12:23 PM | Reply

He won the election.

He is the President.

What a small little tiny ego "man" that thinks he is damaged in some way worth a $20,000,000,000

Retribution tour continues. The never ending flow of crapola continues.

Nothing to be done. The Grift is all.

#3 | Posted by randomcanyon at 2025-02-10 11:59 AM | Reply

Another aspect of this...

Paramount owns CBS, and is in the middle of a merger attempt with Skydance.

Paramount to Turn Over Records on Skydance Deal Amid Standoff With FCC
www.hollywoodreporter.com

... A Delaware court ruled that Paramount must produce records that could lay the groundwork for more lawsuits from investors challenging the deal as the company contends with a new FCC commissioner who's signaled his intent on holding up the merger.

To Paramount, Skydance appeared to be the ideal buyer for the company when it announced the $8 billion megadeal last year: big enough for its name to have cachet in Hollywood, with a founder boasting ties to deep pockets, but small enough for the merger not to raise red flags with antitrust enforcers. And to sweeten the pot, the David Ellison-led firm proposed paying a premium on voting shares owned by Shari Redstone. It was supposed to be smooth sailing.

Six months later, Paramount is fighting a multifront battle amid a political firestorm sparked by President Donald Trump's efforts to consolidate control over the press to get the deal across the finish line. On one side is Brendan Carr, an animated FCC commissioner and Trump loyalist who's asserted his authority over parts of the merger by leveraging the agency's control over the transfer of broadcast licenses. On the other is a growing contingent of investors who suspect that Redstone enriched herself at their expense. ...


So, that $20 billion is beginning to look more like a bribe request from Pres Trump to allow the merger to go through, than anything resembling a fine.



#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-02-10 12:35 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2025 World Readable

Drudge Retort