Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, November 02, 2025

More than 5,000 law enforcement departments across the U.S. use interconnected Flock Safety cameras to track residents' movements.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... Boyce had read that Sedona had quietly signed a new contract with Flock Safety, the country's largest provider of automatic license plate readers (ALPRs), which had installed four cameras to build a database of every car that drove by. Eight more were planned for later in the year. ...

She was furious to learn that she was being tracked by a system paid for with her tax dollars and without her consent.

"I'd drive by them and flip them off and curse them," she said of the cameras. "It was like we were building our own prisons, and we were paying for it."

So Boyce took action, rallying her community to push for change. ...



(apologies for the double-post)


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-02 12:26 AM | Reply

More ...

Flock Safety
en.wikipedia.org

... Flock Group Inc., doing business as Flock Safety,[1] is an American manufacturer and operator of security hardware and software, particularly automated license plate recognition (ALPR), video surveillance, and gunfire locator systems, and supporting software to integrate the data gathered by these technologies. Founded in 2017, Flock operates such systems under contract with law enforcement agencies, neighborhood associations, and private property owners.

As of 2025, Flock claims to operate in over 5,000 communities across 49 U.S. states, and perform over 20 billion scans of vehicles in the U.S. every month.[2][3][4] Flock Safety's network of cameras, utilizing image recognition and machine learning, can share data with police departments and can be integrated into predictive policing platforms like Palantir.[5]

Flock differs from its competitors in that it markets their services not just to law enforcement, but also to homeowner associations and similar community organizations as tools for crime prevention.

They claim that their systems aid criminal investigations; however, they are widely described by critics as an example of mass surveillance, and their efficacy and effects on privacy and other civil liberties are the subject of extensive public scrutiny, debate, and litigation.[6] ...


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-02 12:30 AM | Reply

Another view ...

Flock's Aggressive Expansions Go Far Beyond Simple Driver Surveillance
www.aclu.org

... Build it (an authoritarian tracking infrastructure) and they (expanded uses) will come ...

#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-02 12:33 AM | Reply

One quite curious aspect of Flock's surveillance cameras is that they seem to rely upon solar power.

Is that not contrary to the goals of the current occupant of the Oval Office?

#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-02 12:34 AM | Reply

Under Surveillance: Constitutional Concerns Surrounding Flock Cameras
journals.law.unc.edu

... How would you feel if every time you left your house, cameras were tracking every detail of your vehicle and exactly where you were going? This is a reality in many communities nationwide as "Flock Safety" cameras continue to gain popularity among police departments and private business owners. These cameras are touted for reducing crime and aiding police departments in unsolved cases. However, there are questions surrounding the constitutionality of the new technology.

Flock Safety was founded in 2017 by three Georgia Tech alumni and has since become one of the fastest-growing companies in Atlanta. Their cameras can now be found in 4,000 cities across 42 different states. This includes North Carolina communities like Raleigh, where the police department installed 25 cameras in 2023. Within only 6 months of installation, the cameras assisted police officers in making 41 arrests.

The cameras work by taking a picture of a vehicle when it passes by. From the picture, it collects data about the vehicle such as the license plate number, color, and model. It can even track more subtle characteristics such as the bumper stickers on the car or whether the car has a roof rack. This data is then transferred to the Flock database where it can be accessed by Flock customers such as law enforcement agencies. The data is stored for up to 30 days after the information is first logged.

Police departments have touted this new technology as allowing them to solve numerous cases and find stolen cars. The CEO of Flock claimed that the devices help police departments solve about 2,200 crimes per day. However, it is not only police departments who are relying on this new tech. Homeowners associations and private companies are also customers of Flock and are able to tap into their immense network of data. All of this leaves around 70 percent of the population under the coverage of Flock's cameras. ...


#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-02 12:43 AM | Reply

@#5 ... It can even track more subtle characteristics such as the bumper stickers on the car ...

So... if you have a political bumper sticker on your car, you may be tracked?

#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-02 12:44 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I mean, they're license plates. The entire purpose of that item is to enable tracking. Cameras just make it more efficient.

#7 | Posted by censored at 2025-11-02 06:37 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort