Advertisement
Court rejects GOP bid to block new Utah congressional map
The three-judge panel decided Monday that it was too late to redraw the state's congressional map ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
lamplighter
Joined 2013/04/13Visited 2026/02/23
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Court rejects GOP bid to block new Utah congressional map (2 comments) ...
Former DOJ attorneys warn agency has been 'decimated' (1 comments) ...
DOGE Bites Taxman (12 comments) ...
Denmark Buying US Missiles to Defend Greenland from the US (15 comments) ...
Full Cost of War Act: Tie Force Decisions to Veteran Funding (2 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the article ...
... A federal court rejected a bid by Utah Republicans to block a new court-ordered congressional map, dealing a major blow to the Republican Party following a yearslong redistricting saga. The decision means Democrats are likely to net one seat out of the state, which currently has a four-person all-GOP House delegation, absent late intervention from the Supreme Court. Republican lawmakers in Utah passed a congressional map in October after state court Judge Dianna Gibson ruled the state could not use previous lines carving up Democratic stronghold Salt Lake City. ...
The decision means Democrats are likely to net one seat out of the state, which currently has a four-person all-GOP House delegation, absent late intervention from the Supreme Court.
Republican lawmakers in Utah passed a congressional map in October after state court Judge Dianna Gibson ruled the state could not use previous lines carving up Democratic stronghold Salt Lake City. ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-23 03:54 PM | Reply
"The [Federal District Court's] ruling hinged on the "Purcell Principle," a legal principle holding that federal courts should not intervene in voting-related cases during the run-up to an election."
Trump SCOTUS in two weeks as it restored the gerrymander: "LOL! A principle? What are those?"
#2 | Posted by censored at 2026-02-23 04:16 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy