CDC Still Recommends Childhood COVID Vaccines, Despite RFK Announcement

Saturday, May 31, 2025

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is still recommending COVID vaccines for healthy children, according to the CDC's latest published immunization schedule.

Posted by jpw at 06:32 PM | 28 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

RFK Jr. says the CDC will no longer recommend COVID vaccines for healthy pregnant women. Yet doctors have found that stillbirths can result from COVID directly infiltrating the placenta -- even for people whose COVID symptoms were mild or nonexistent. @deldeib.bsky.socialâ€¬'s story from 2022:

[image or embed]
-- ProPublica (@propublica.org) May 30, 2025 at 10:00 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Aaaahahahahahahaha suck it brain worm.

#1 | Posted by jpw at 2025-05-30 07:29 PM | Reply

Good for the CDC, still putting public health at the forefront.

#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-05-31 01:45 PM | Reply

My title better described the situation. Just sayin' ...

#3 | Posted by jpw at 2025-05-31 07:57 PM | Reply

@#3

I do not disagree.

The CDC seems to have told Sec Kennedy to go take a hike, as your headline implies.

And, imo, that is A Good Thing.

But one question that lingers for me (and I had it when I wrote #2), how long might the Trump administration allow such CDC dissent?

Or will this turn into another TACO instance?

#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-05-31 08:10 PM | Reply

CDC follows Pfizer's executive bonus plan recommendation.

#5 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-05-31 09:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

CDC follows actual conclusions reached from actual studies.

You're an ignorant blowhard, just STFU and let your betters take care of things.

#6 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-01 09:59 AM | Reply

CDC follows Pfizer's executive bonus plan recommendation.

Inject 10cc of Clorox and post tomorrow morning and let us know how you're feeling.

www.emergencyphysicians.org - only in it for the money /s

#7 | Posted by YAV at 2025-06-01 10:49 AM | Reply

The individuals at the CDC making this recommendation did so only looking at the science and not present or future financial benefits that may or may occur with a future or previous employer. Sure.

#8 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-06-01 12:55 PM | Reply

#8 you're slinging unsubstantiated nonsense because you're an idiot with chronic intellectual laziness.

#9 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-01 01:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#7 | Posted by YAV

Chlorine Dioxide? You're soaking in it now!

#10 | Posted by cabron_loco at 2025-06-01 01:47 PM | Reply

news.harvard.edu
study-counts-u-s-health-care-regulators-in-revolving-door-with-private-industry/

#11 | Posted by cabron_loco at 2025-06-01 01:49 PM | Reply

A broken link from a broken mind.

#12 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-01 01:58 PM | Reply

A total of 183 children 1 to 17 years old who died of COVID-19 were reported in the National Fatality Review-Case Reporting System. One-third (33%) were 15- to 17-year-olds, and 26% were 1- to 4-year-olds.Nov 1, 2024
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov<>

#13 | Posted by homerj at 2025-06-01 05:52 PM | Reply

Awesome.
Now make a point.

I'll go first: Do you remember why COVID vaccinations were recommended for children? Any clue?
Let's see how smart you actually are:

#14 | Posted by YAV at 2025-06-01 10:15 PM | Reply

I'll even help:
publichealth.jhu.edu

#15 | Posted by YAV at 2025-06-01 10:19 PM | Reply

If JPW had his way doctors would still be prescribing Oxycontin for mild pain with a label that says only a 1% addiction rate.

Fkkk you and the CDC/FDA/NIH. The gig is up and people are realizing that the government, along with these executives, are using their bodies as a cash cow. That Harvard Gazette article isn't the first of its kind telling people they can't trust the FDA. The Harvard Medical Journal published two others explaining the dangers of rushing medications through just to turn a profit on a new patent. Funny how the other two articles are now behind a sign in screen and you need an account to access them since the clot shot came out.

#16 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-06-02 09:08 AM | Reply

triggered!

lol

#17 | Posted by YAV at 2025-06-02 09:19 AM | Reply

If JPW had his way doctors would still be prescribing Oxycontin for mild pain with a label that says only a 1% addiction rate.

Except that was a blatant, documented lie that wasn't hard to spot based on the drug compound.

The s%^* you cite against Covid vaccines depends on your ignorance to keep traction.

Anyone with a lick of knowledge of virology and immunology laughs at you tools.

#18 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-03 12:33 AM | Reply

since the clot shot came out.

#16 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

In your ignorance you prove my point.

The "clot shot" were adenovirus based vaccines from AstraZeneca and J&J.

They were both pulled from the market after a safety signal of about 130 cases out of millions of administered doses showed a low risk of clotting disorder in middle aged women.

FFS if for the ease of math, if you say an even 100 out of a million doses, you're at a 0.01% risk rate.

But we're talking about ~130 out of MILLIONS. And it got pulled, even when every vaccine was under an EUA. Thats hardly the picture you paint.

You don't have a clue. You've never had a clue. Just stop and go sit down.

#19 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-03 12:42 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

No please, go FF that because you don't know enough to write a response.

#20 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-03 12:43 AM | Reply

@#19 ... You don't have a clue. You've never had a clue. ...

So, I am not the only who seems to have noticed that tendency of that alias?

#21 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-06-03 12:55 AM | Reply

No please, go FF that because you don't know enough to write a response.

#20 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-03 12:43 AM | Reply | Flag

There is no response to the -------- you post here under the mask of a dOcToR pDh. What I said was correct and all you have is a stupid argument that two shots were pulled. You only address what your feeble mind will allow you to. Do the world a favor and get back to making burgers and fries.

#22 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-06-03 07:59 AM | Reply

You do your best to cement your ignorance.
I do not understand why.
Seems learning takes less work.
It is curious. This determination to stay ignorant.

#23 | Posted by YAV at 2025-06-03 08:43 AM | Reply

"You do your best to cement your ignorance."

It's what he does best.
It really is.

#24 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-03 11:24 AM | Reply

"The gig is up and people are realizing that the government, along with these executives, are using their bodies as a cash cow"

Why do you think the United States imported slaves?
How are you, a grown adult, just now figuring out how Capitalism works?

You are a loudmouth dummy.

#25 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-03 11:27 AM | Reply

"Study counts U.S. healthcare regulators in revolving door' with private industry"

Oh great.
Another one.
How are you, a grown adult, just now figuring out how Capitalism works?

And why don't you decry the same thing happening with, say, Trump's Cabinet?
Because you're a useful idiot fanboy for fascism.

#26 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-03 11:29 AM | Reply

The individuals at the CDC making this recommendation did so only looking at the science and not present or future financial benefits that may or may occur with a future or previous employer. Sure.
#8 | Posted by visitor_

Does this apply to vaccines that were recalled too?

#27 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-03 11:41 AM | Reply

"JPW had his way doctors would still be prescribing Oxycontin for mild pain with a label that says only a 1% addiction rate."

Who wrote that label? Was is the FDA? Was it the doctors?

#28 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-03 11:43 AM | Reply