Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, August 21, 2025

A federal judge has ordered Mississippi to redraw its election map used in voting for state supreme court justices after finding the current one dilutes the power of Black voters in violation of a landmark federal voting rights law.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Judge Aycock's ruling notes that only four Black people have served on the Mississippi Supreme Court. All of them held the same seat in the Central District and were first appointed to the position by a sitting governor. Mississippi's population is 38% Black.

[image or embed]

-- Mississippi Free Press (@mississippifreepress.org) Aug 21, 2025 at 5:45 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... U.S. District Judge Sharion Aycock in Greenville sided with a group of Black citizens of the state in finding on Tuesday that the map in place since 1987 for Mississippi Supreme Court elections violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The court's nine justices are elected in nonpartisan races from three districts to serve eight-year, staggered terms. The map's lines are drawn by the state legislature and have changed little in over a century, according to the plaintiffs.

Black people make up about 40% of the state's population, but Aycock noted that the Mississippi Supreme Court has had only four Black justices, none of whom have served at the same time. Each held the same seat in District 1, which includes the city of Jackson and part of the Mississippi Delta, and all four were first appointed by a governor.

The only Black justice currently is Presiding Justice Leslie King.
"In short, the evidence illustrates that Black candidates who desire to run for the Mississippi Supreme Court face a grim likelihood of success," Aycock wrote. ...

But Aycock, who presided over a non-jury trial in the case, said that data did not reflect voter eligibility or account for the state's lifetime ban on voting for people convicted of certain felonies, which disproportionately affects Black people.

Aycock pointed to a history of the southern state suppressing Black voters over nearly a century leading up to the Voting Rights Act's passage, after they gained the right to vote in the state in 1868 following the end of the Civil War. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-20 04:17 PM | Reply

Reminds me of ...

U.S. Appeals Court Strikes Down North Carolina's Voter ID Law (2016)
www.npr.org

...The appeals court noted that the North Carolina Legislature "requested data on the use, by race, of a number of voting practices" -- then, data in hand, "enacted legislation that restricted voting and registration in five different ways, all of which disproportionately affected African Americans."

The changes to the voting process "target African Americans with almost surgical precision," the circuit court wrote, and "impose cures for problems that did not exist."

The appeals court suggested that the motivation was fundamentally political -- a Republican legislature attempting to secure its power by blocking votes from a population likely to vote for Democrats....

[emphasis mine]

#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-20 06:10 PM | Reply

But Aycock, who presided over a non-jury trial in the case, said that data did not reflect voter eligibility or account for the state's lifetime ban on voting for people convicted of certain felonies, which disproportionately affects black people (who are felons and simultaneously want to be on the supreme court).

#3 | Posted by easy_meat at 2025-08-22 06:36 AM | Reply

What?

It dilutes the Black Vote?

...Nobody could have anticipated...am I right?

#4 | Posted by Wardog at 2025-08-22 08:27 AM | Reply

In the GOP...

Politicians choose voters.

Voters do not choose politicians.

#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-22 11:40 AM | Reply

It dilutes the Black Vote?

Right, Mississippi is like 90% black. It just looks like 38% because they eat census takers.
Don't take my word for it; go there and see for yourself.

#6 | Posted by easy_meat at 2025-08-22 02:05 PM | Reply

Don't worry Mississippu racists the Roberts Court will overturn the Appeals Court and insure White Power remains strong in your S**thole state!

#7 | Posted by danni at 2025-08-22 02:52 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort