|
Thursday, November 20, 2025
The hearing Wednesday morning in the case against former FBI Director James Comey ended with a revelation by prosecutors and a conundrum: if a full grand jury never reviewed the final set of charges handed up against Comey, are they void? The question arose after a shocking back and forth where prosecutors conceded that instead of presenting a new indictment to the grand jury after it declined to approve one of three counts, interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan simply brought an altered version, omitting the rejected count, to the magistrate's courtroom for the grand jury's foreperson to sign. |
||
|
More Alternate links: Google News | Twitter Nachmanoff called on Halligan " Trump's handpicked US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia who secured the indictment against Comey by herself " to explain exactly what grand jurors did, or did not, see. Halligan appeared frustrated as she confirmed that only the foreperson and one other juror " not the entire grand jury " saw the final indictment. Comments
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. |
||
