Why Is the GOP Blocking Epstein Bank Records?
Senator Ron Wyden has been working for years to unravel Jeffrey Epstein's crimes by following his money.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
LampLighter
Joined 2013/04/13Visited 2026/03/24
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Russia's Max: unencrypted app being forced on citizens (1 comments) ...
Quoting the Bible, more Democrats lean into being Christian (2 comments) ...
NTSB probes controller as part of investigation LGA crash (11 comments) ...
Trump Says Senators Should Stay in DC Over Easter for Jesus (7 comments) ...
ICE Official Says Agents Will 'Hate' Helping TSA at Airports (2 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Why is the GOP blocking Epstein bank records? jkbjournalist.substack.com/p/why-is-gop ... [image or embed] -- Timothy McBride (@mcbridetd.bsky.social) Mar 20, 2026 at 7:34 AM
Why is the GOP blocking Epstein bank records? jkbjournalist.substack.com/p/why-is-gop ... [image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the article ...
... His banks were fined by the Government and the financial institutions paid over $365 million dollars in civil legal settlements to victims for failing to flag suspicious bank transactions involving his businesses over the years. Those financial transactions could provide a road map of Epstein's crimes -- the scope of his illicit activities and who else was involved. Wyden has been doing what others have failed to do -- and that includes officials in both the Biden and the Trump administrations. Epstein's transactions, according to Wyden " who saw some of them under the Biden administration -- were connected to payments made to women and others who presumably worked for him as part of his various criminal networks. ... Like everything else Epstein, that investigation died. No one was charged, and it's not clear why. The public, and especially Epstein's victims, deserve to know what happened " and whether there was any undue influence that led the case to be scuttled " and another opportunity to put Epstein behind bars wasted. Wyden would like to see an unredacted copy of that report. But just like the Epstein' files, the DOJ is making it as difficult as possible. ...
Those financial transactions could provide a road map of Epstein's crimes -- the scope of his illicit activities and who else was involved.
Wyden has been doing what others have failed to do -- and that includes officials in both the Biden and the Trump administrations.
Epstein's transactions, according to Wyden " who saw some of them under the Biden administration -- were connected to payments made to women and others who presumably worked for him as part of his various criminal networks. ...
Like everything else Epstein, that investigation died. No one was charged, and it's not clear why. The public, and especially Epstein's victims, deserve to know what happened " and whether there was any undue influence that led the case to be scuttled " and another opportunity to put Epstein behind bars wasted.
Wyden would like to see an unredacted copy of that report. But just like the Epstein' files, the DOJ is making it as difficult as possible. ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-21 01:01 PM | Reply
Another view ...
Republicans Block Epstein Financial Records Subpoena (October 2025) www.kbklawyers.com
... Attorneys Brian Kabateck and Shant Karnikian expose how House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan killed subpoenas for Jeffrey Epstein's financial records from four major banks just as Congress was poised to investigate $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions. ...
#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-21 01:03 PM | Reply
@#2
Who might Rep Jordan be trying to protect?
#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-21 08:35 PM | Reply
Trump's transactions.
#4 | Posted by a_monson at 2026-03-21 10:56 PM | Reply
Can't expose the actual powers behind the thrones, now, can we? And I used "thrones" intentionally. I don't believe for a second these pervs are exclusively donating to the GOP.
#5 | Posted by morris at 2026-03-22 01:46 PM | Reply
Preserving the Status Quo apparently is more important than how evil the Status Quo has become.
And it's become pretty damn evil.
#6 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-22 02:33 PM | Reply
why didn't Biden release the Bank Records?
#7 | Posted by Maverick at 2026-03-23 11:37 AM | Reply
Why is your mom's ass leaking?
#8 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-23 10:40 PM | Reply
@#7 ... why didn't Biden release the Bank Records? ...
Good question.
But now it is the GOP that is blocking the release.
Why?
#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-23 10:45 PM | Reply
OpEd: Why Biden didn't release the Epstein files -- but maybe should have (February 2026) thehill.com
... In December, former Vice President Kamala Harris told late-night host Jimmy Kimmel why the Biden Administration had not released the so-called Epstein files during the four years that President Joe Biden was in office. "We strongly and rightly believed that there should be an absolute separation between what we wanted as an administration and what the Department of Justice did," she said. "We absolutely adhered to that." Just a month earlier, Harris had criticized President Trump for waiting for Congress to act. "Release the files," she said. "He is the president of the United States, the head of the executive branch." So which is it? Did Biden have the authority to release the files or not? Should he have wielded it or not? The answer is a bit of both. What Harris is suggesting is that Biden left that decision to his Attorney General, Merrick Garland. Garland viewed it as his role to defend the Justice Department's independence vigorously from political influence. ...
"We strongly and rightly believed that there should be an absolute separation between what we wanted as an administration and what the Department of Justice did," she said. "We absolutely adhered to that."
Just a month earlier, Harris had criticized President Trump for waiting for Congress to act. "Release the files," she said. "He is the president of the United States, the head of the executive branch."
So which is it? Did Biden have the authority to release the files or not? Should he have wielded it or not? The answer is a bit of both.
What Harris is suggesting is that Biden left that decision to his Attorney General, Merrick Garland. Garland viewed it as his role to defend the Justice Department's independence vigorously from political influence. ...
#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-23 10:49 PM | Reply
"What Kamala Harris is suggesting is that Joe Biden left that decision to his Attorney General, Merrick Garland. Garland viewed it as his role to defend the Justice Department's independence vigorously from political influence and to conceal from the Gentiles sinister Israeli and Mossad connections throughout the sinews of American power, decision-making, and banking."
#11 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-03-23 11:22 PM | Reply
#12 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-03-23 11:25 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy