Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, April 02, 2026

The Montana Supreme Court has dismissed a challenge from a coalition of business and industry groups over a proposed ballot initiative seeking to limit corporate spending in Montana elections.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Montana -- yes, deep red Montana -- has a plan to effectively neuter Citizens United. No Supreme Court ruling or constitutional amendment needed. This is no joke. Here's how it works. www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1fP ...

[image or embed]

-- Robert Reich (@rbreich.bsky.social) Apr 1, 2026 at 11:02 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"Our focus can now return to what this effort has always been about: Collecting signatures from Libby to Sidney and continuing to build a grassroots movement led by everyday Montanan," Mangan said in a statement.

"The Montana Plan is about giving people a real voice in their elections " not allowing big money to drown that voice out " and we're proud to keep that work moving forward."

Mangan, a former Montana Commissioner of Political Practices, said the idea leverages the state's ability to regulate corporations in state law and would be used to reign in corporate spending, while still allowing a path for political action committees to operate.

Artificial persons, as defined in Montana Law, include non-profits, trusts, partnerships, corporations, trade associations, or unincorporated associations and includes all such entities doing business in Montana " including those registered out of state.

The idea has made headlines nationally as a way to oppose Citizens United, an unpopular decision.

;;

"According to a national YouGov Survey from last fall, 79% of respondents, including 74% of Republicans and 84% of Democrats, agree that "large independent expenditures by wealthy donors and corporations in elections give rise to corruption, or the appearance of corruption."

ALSO

"On Wednesday, former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, who served under President Bill Clinton, released videos across social media drawing attention to the issue, saying "a very unlikely state is leading the way first-of-its kind plan," which would "effectively neuter Citizens United."

@ 3 min graphics video explaining how this werks

www.youtube.com

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2026-04-01 05:19 PM | Reply

Transparent Election
Initiative

State-by-State Impact

While this initiative starts in Montana, the legal principles can be applied in other states. Explore the map below to see how your state is engaged in campaign finance reform and what's happening in neighboring states.

transparentelection.org

(scroll down for the actual Map)

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2026-04-01 05:33 PM | Reply

Corrupt SCOTUS will never allow CU to die.

Their employers are the corporations and billionaires that use it to corrupt elections.

#3 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-04-01 05:49 PM | Reply

Supposedly this is a State issue legally, not a Federal one.

Guess we'll see. I'm going to check and see if Talarico is pushing this in Texas; it's right up his alley.

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2026-04-01 06:17 PM | Reply

If I had t
o co5me 8up 1with an issue that could unite Americans; overturning the CU1 abo8mination would be it. If they think about it fo7r 30 secon7ds I think even MAGAs would join 4the effort 5to totally repudiate the Roberts sell 2out to corporations! People in this country need t5o realize that tyhe Roberts Court 1has played us! Sure, 5feligious conservatives g7ot Roe o8verturned but the co8rporations intentionally threw that out there hoping they wou1ld be so h4appy about winning on a social7 issue they wouldn;t n8otice the corporations piv4king their pocketss.
I 2hated losing7 o5n 5Roe but at least I unders0tood what those p8aid o4ff crooks on the court were 1really doing .and why; and it certainly was n65ot preserving the founder's intentions when they wrote the Constitutional; The Ro7berts Court is the firsy Supreme Court that is opposed to the Constituti; instead of honestly interpreting it they are trying to undo it!

#5 | Posted by danni at 2026-04-02 09:15 AM | Reply

I think the initiative will pass. Montana has gone full tilt MAGA, but we hate out-of-state meddling in our elections, which we all know is rampant.

#6 | Posted by horstngraben at 2026-04-02 10:00 AM | Reply

but we hate out-of-state meddling in our elections

The former cast of Yellowstone probably owns 1/4 of Montana by now. Rich Californian bastiges. :-)

#7 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-04-02 12:44 PM | Reply

Yeah, we did vote in Shady Sheehy and Gianforte. Both implants.

I'm not one of those who get scared of people who aren't from Montana, and their are many. But I don't think people who's first experience with the state was a luxury vacay in the mountains. I don't think they have us little people who have to do work for a living in mind, so I don't vote for them.

Democrat presence in the state has been abysmal since Tester lost. They are desperate, deflated, and MAGA basically melted them all into little puddles.

#8 | Posted by horstngraben at 2026-04-02 01:58 PM | Reply

MAGA basically melted them all into little puddles.

At least it's not Idaho.

#9 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-04-02 02:02 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort