#19 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-12-10 12:35 PM | Reply | Flag

He assaulted multiple passengers by throwing garbage at them. He also became very hostile to a point where a woman with a small child was shielding herself behind her baby stroller.

"2. Why did this guy keep him in a choke hold for 6 whole minutes and long after he passed out?"

Probably had something to do with training as a marine.

#20 | Posted by lfthndthrds

So he assaulted no one.

And his training was to murder the guy.

Thanks for clearing that up.

"sexual experiences with another person."

Par for the Trump course.

Bringing woke and DEI into an institution that needs to prioritize battle readiness over all else.
#15 | Posted by BellRinger

Explain what those are when it comes to the military.

Seriously, tell us the exact policies you are referring to.

He never should have been charged in the first place.

#9 | Posted by BellRinger

Two questions:

1. Who did the victim hurt?
2. Why did this guy keep him in a choke hold for 6 whole minutes and long after he passed out?

"Not censorship because I dislike Abortion."
-Jeff Epstein Bellringer

"Argentina's inflation slowed to 2.7% in October, the lowest level in three years in a win for the libertarian government of President Javier Milei who came to power almost a year ago promising to pull Argentina out of a dire economic crisis."

In the middle of one of the biggest economic turnarounds in history after a century or so of being one of the biggest economic basket cases in the world.

#5 | Posted by sitzkrieg

Inflation tends to drop when everyone is poor and no one can afford to buy anything.

Pretty basic Supply-Demand Economics here.

For example, their beef prices aren't going up...because NO ONE IS BUYING IT.

If he's the actual shooter and is convicted before Jan 20 Biden will probably pardon him.

#8 | Posted by BellRinger

OH! I figured it out.

You get all your views from Ben Shapiro.

EVERYTHING you say literally all matches up perfectly with his podcast.

You listen to him and then come spout his nonsense here.

If he's the actual shooter and is convicted before Jan 20 Biden will probably pardon him.

#8 | Posted by BellRinger

Why is this a partisan issue?

And...do you have any idea how many people on BOTH SIDES of the aisle would support the pardon?

We can't solve the world's problems, especially in that region where many folks think they have a direct line to Allah and China and Russia help prop them up. The best we can hope for is to protect ourselves and our allies.

#24 | Posted by censored

Solve? No.

Make worse? Yes.

You Republicans have been GREAT at making it worse.

I remember VIVIDLY being told online in Spring 2021 multiple times that, after admitting I got the jab, I will be "dead by Christmas." Usually followed by several exclamation points.
Ahem.

#10 | Posted by e1g1

It's BS. My damn vax micro chip gets like zero reception. What's the point?

I have yet to read anything from the Dailymail that's been false.

Sometimes, you just want to read about things that make sense.

#10 | Posted by boaz

And they wonder why Republicans live in a world of Alternative Facts.

I mean...if people are stupid enough to buy it...that's on them.

IRONY

Farmers vote against regulation and then sue the EPA to get more regulation.

Why should Russia make a deal if it knows Trump intends to cut aid to Ukraine and potentially pull out of NATO?

You have to remember that shrimptacodan is not from the US.

He actually wants this country to fail and hates US veterans.

Kind of like Elon actually.

I say do it.

Slash the benefits heavily.

This is what veterans voted for by large majorities.

It would be wrong not to honor what they supported.

Not apparently but you are ignorant. American elects it's president based on the electoral college not based on the popular vote (which Trump also won) And 312-226 is an ass kicking.

#57 | Posted by fishpaw

Bless your heart.

Keep telling yourself that.

- Donald Trump Pardoned his political allies under investigation for crimes related to the charges against himself, protecting himself from charges
#55 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

Whats interesting about a pardon, is that the person accepting the pardon cannot plead the 5th.
So I am not sure your assertion makes any sense, it wouldn't protect someone it would make them a liability.
That being said, you literally are the stupidest person I have ever seen post.

#58 | Posted by oneironaut

Wrong again.

Because there are still potential state charges, they can easily plead the 5th.

Also questionable as to whether or not one can be pardoned before any charges are brought against an individual, let alone fond guilty. This is one for the SCOTUS to decide.

#51 | Posted by MSgt

No.

Just no.

Not even remotely a question.

Have you seen what this thread is about? It's about preempted pardons for Democrats. Why would they need a pardon if no crimes were committed?

#32 | Posted by fishpaw

Because you don't need to commit a crime to be charged with a crime.

" This is a pardon, after all, and the Supreme Court's ruling in Burdick v. United States establishes that accepting a pardon carries with it "an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it." If the Biden White House issued these pardons, they'd be doing the Trump administration's work for them by branding them criminals in some ill-defined way."

www.nationalreview.com

#31 | Posted by BellRinger

This is why you don't let non-lawyers write about the law.

In Burdick v. US (1915), that part about imputation of guilt was dictum. It was NOT part of the ruling nor established as law.

In Lorrance v. Commandant, USDB, the 10th circuit said the complete opposite and that was part of the ruling, a key part in fact.

So as of right now, there is no clear legal ruling on whether a Pardon carries an imputation of guilt or acceptance of a confession other than the Lorrance decision.

Cool enjoy your $20 scoop of ice cream.

#13 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

Facts: A lot of places pay $18 an hour and the cost difference in the food is negligible.

25 cents more, not $20.

" The judge overseeing Hunter's California case lashed out at President Biden in a scathing five-page ruling, saying the White House press release justifying his pardon was full of offensive and false statements, including that Hunter's tax evasion was the result of addiction."

x.com

What say you all about this?

#449 | Posted by BellRinger

I say I don't give a damn after all the Trump pardons of people who broke the law to help him.

Why don't you try defending Trump's pardons before whining about Hunter Biden?

Republicans would support Trump doing this.

We aren't South Korea.

I'm not much into conspiracy theories

#307 | Posted by BellRinger

This is the funniest thing said on the DR in 2024, possibly ever.