#4 | Posted by oneironaut
#9 | Posted by BellRinger

#38

Word salad.

Supreme Court allows Trump to enforce Alien Enemies Act for rapid deportations for now

In short, they get due process i.e. notice and opportunity to be heard.

#26 | Posted by itchyp

All unrelated to the case cited at 15 that occurred 2 days ago and all for reasons other than that case.

Again, you're obviously not good at this law s**t. I suggest you stop digging.

Nucking Fidiot.

#22 | Posted by itchyp

I'm having trouble finding everywhere out of one. Help a brother out.

Or just stick to s**t you know something about which certainly isn't law.

Nucking Fidiot.

#18 | Posted by itchyp

I preach as I choose. This ruling is likely to have zero affect on any other judge. It's a non-precedential stay ruling not a "merits" ruling.

#14 | Posted by itchyp

Yeah, well good luck with dat.

Can one of you Buffoon fellator's tell me how a how a 50%+ price increase on a s***load of stuff from Walmart, etc is a good thing. Or will you tell me how the other countries pay the the tariffs like the dumba** Buffoon says?

#8

An executor only exercises authority after death.

Before death authority is likely via some form of power of attorney which dies at death.

Either way, as a fiduciary (look up that word), you were a nucking fidiot signing anything before getting a copy.

The Buffoon is pulling his typical chaos agent male bovine manure. There exist extremist, see that word, understand it, theories to get around the Twenty Second Amendment. All of them thwart the the original intent of that Amendment. Welcome to your world of chaos.

F*****g idiots.

LMAO Due process to the extent that the committee members who put them in prison ...

Hey, dumb a**. Each and every, all and singular person put in prison for J6 was by a United State
District Court Judge. Some with the assistance of a jury of their peers, most by their guilty pleas. The only thing funny about that is their dumb a** conduct that got them there. But more funny is dumb f**ks like you trying to pave over such dumb a** conduct.

Hey, dumb f**k. Fauci has nothing to do with this thread. Either tell us by what legal authority the Buffoon arrogates unto himself power about elections or f**k right off.

Since no one has even attempted to identify the legal authority for the Buffoon attempting to regulate elections. I'll also guess no one can tell me wtf gain of function research has to do with said elections.

Try none and nothing.

Fy, pos troll.

So none of you Buffoon worshiper's can identify the legal authority for the Buffoon's order. Typical. They never can because it doesn't exit. The Buffoon's strategy is create chaos and reap whatever falls out. Not governance.

Perhaps The Buffoon should familiarize himself with Art. 1 Sec. 4 Cls.1 of the Constitution, known as the Elections Clause. It says,

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

Posted by ScottS

I am not a Democrat. My political mentor was my grandfather, a survivor of WW1, Herbert Hoover and the Great Depression. In short, a yellow dog Democrat. He was depressed with my first time to vote for Nixon in '72 and to his delight my later regret of that vote.

That said, the Buffoon is an embarrassment to everything I've learned about politics and government from my other grandfather's elections as a Justice of the Peace, to high school civics, to knocking on doors for Wallace at the behest of my Dad, to a political science degree, to 35 plus years of practicing law.

Invoking a statute enacted to deal with war with another government to deal with a drug gang is a bridge too far. It reeks of incompetence on the Bufoon's part.

I have 3 copies of the Constitution in my house and one resides on my night stand. I periodically flip through it and have read it in its entirety on numerous occasions.
#167 | Posted by BellRinger

Jesus f****g crist, get with the jist of the exchange. Court's have enjoined his stupid but the question was about discipline (sanctions). Idiot.

sanctionable

There is a fine line between sanctional court conduct and pushing the outer limits of law and precedent. A president pushing the outer limits will get the benefit of the doubt.

Yes but only for what they do in court. Not for just being idiots.