This comprehensive list was compiled by Mark Jacob, former editor at the Chicago Tribune, author, and writer of the newsletter Stop The Presses. It highlights 200 reasons to vote against Donald Trump, addressing his actions, statements, and policies that have undermined democracy, harmed the country, and divided Americans. read more
Offshore betting markets like Polymarket mislead voters by substituting right-wing "vibes" for data. read more
An initiative called Progress 2028 that purports to be Kamala Harris' liberal counter to the conservative Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 is actually run by a dark money network supporting former President Donald Trump. read more
"I wanna say that I did make a mistake," [Fox News anchor Bret] Baier admitted. "When I called for a soundbite, I was expecting a piece of the enemy from within' from Maria Bartiromo's interview, to be tied to the piece from [Harris Faulkner's ]town hall." read more
Last week's MAGA-inflected spectacle cast Kamala Harris as demonic, and Trump an avatar of biblical justice
Gal ... there was at least one article that made it to the front page about Kamala leading betting markets a few weeks back. So was that article wrong because it didn't gauge Trump's surge in popularity or what?
As well, Harris is losing every swing state aggregate polling. Are we to believe there's a problem with these polls as well?
#16 | Posted by Bluewaffles
As I said upthread, Forget the betting markets, forget the polls. Just vote:
The red wave campaign this year is on a much greater scale than 2022. It started much earlier, has many more actors and has produced far more polling. It needed to be bigger for in general election years there is more polling. So to move the averages more polls were needed, and they got to work earlier doing so. And this is important. In 2022 the campaign began late, in mid-October. They had less time to move the averages so their polls were often 3-4 points to the right of the polling as they needed these bigger margins to move the averages in a shorter time period. This time, because they started earlier and are producing more polls their polls are often only 1-2 points to the right of the polling average or independent polls. They are working the averages more carefully this time, over using the time and volume to move them gradually so the op is not as crude and as easy to see as last time. If Harris leads by 2.5 points and you drop 5 polls showing the race tied or her ahead by 1 or even 2 points the averages moves and it looks like she is losing altitude. . . .www.hopiumchronicles.com
The red wave 2024 campaign also includes a major new entrant, Polymarket, an off-shore crypto-based betting market whose lead investor is Peter Thiel, former business partner to Elon Musk and primary political patron of JD Vance. Polymarket is buying product placement on sites and with influencers for their 2024 American election results even though NO AMERICAN CAN LEGALLY PARTICIPATE IN PROCESS THAT DETERMINES THE DATA. Polymarket is everywhere. Harry Enten higlights their data on CNN. Right wing influencers pump Polymarket maps showing Trump "winning" everyday. Nate Silver is an advisor to Polymarket. Elon and Twitter of course are pumping this stuff, hard.
Am I worried Trump will take action similar to those individuals? No.....but again, he deserves the comparison.
#22 | Posted by eberly
You should be. Former members of his cabinet are, video at link:
Remember?x.com
Trump's former Sec. Def. Mark Esper: "[Trump] was suggesting that... we should bring in the troops & shoot the protesters."
Q: "The commander-in-chief was suggesting that the U.S. military shoot protesters?"
Esper: "Yes, in the streets of our nation's capital."
She has a constituency now and the support of average Dems:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezhttps://x.com/AOC/status/1847677706625851839
@AOC
Hellooo! We're launching a 1000+ person bilingual canvass this AM in Allentown, Pennsylvania.
@TeamAOC helped fill busses with hundreds of canvassers to support the local Harris operation, including 100s of Spanish speakers.
We don't play about our army.
Let's GO! Pa'lante.
This coalition canvass was powered by local @LehighCoDems, @32BJSEIU, @swingleft, @TeamAOC, and Q@ueens_Dems.
Let's go knock some doors
Remember the red tsunami in 2022 that wasn't? Notice the same pattern come mid-October:
Republicans have over 70% chance of winning Senate in midterm elections, betting markets saywww.marketwatch.com Nobody knows how this election is going to turn out:
Last Updated: Nov. 8, 2022
First Published: Oct. 24, 2022
The Republican Party's prospects in today's midterm elections have been continuing to climb this fall, with betting market PredictIt now giving the GOP a more than 70% chance for taking control of the U.S. Senate away from Democrats.
Republicans reached a 76% chance of winning the Senate last Thursday and were at 74% as of Monday, according to PredictIt data.
Democrats had been enjoying an edge over the GOP throughout August and September, but that advantage went away in the second week of October.
"Broadly speaking, Democrats' momentum from the summer has largely leveled off, with voters increasingly focused on Republican issues such as the economy, inflation, and crime, at the expense of Democrats' agenda items, including Roe and guns, according to recent polls," said Benjamin Salisbury, director of research at Height Capital Markets, in a recent note.
Forget the betting markets, forget the polls. Just vote:
Burst of trades inflates Trump's margin in election prediction marketswww.ft.com
Small group of bettors lifts odds of Republican victory to 62 per cent on cryptocurrency-based Polymarket
In theory, betting markets may offer a more accurate forecast of election results than polls and models, though fee structures, market sizes and other limitations can cloud those results.
Polymarket competitor PredictIt infamously gave Hillary Clinton roughly 80 per cent odds of victory in 2016 before her loss. PredictIt traders also continued to give Trump a 10 per cent chance of winning the state of Wisconsin weeks after the race had been called in the media.
"Funny but not haha how Democrat Senators like Casey PA, Sherrod Brown OH etc are frantically buying into Trump policies on trade immig.. They abstain from Kamala rallies."
I think that article is trying to read too much into that ad. Casey is trying to appeal to Democrats, Republicans and Independents. Here's the Casey ad (video at link):
Transcript
I'm a Republican and I'm a Democrat. Our marriage, pure bliss. But on politics, we just don't agree except for Bob Casey. He's independent. That's right. Casey's leading the effort to stop corporate greed, inflation and price gouging Casey bucked Biden to protect fracking and he sided with Trump to end NAFTA and put tariffs on China to stop them from cheating. So, in this house, we agree it's Bob Casey who's doing right by Pennsylvania. I'm Bob Casey and I definitely approve this message.
Running against corporate greed, inflation and price gouging are issues Harris is running on. He appeared at a rally last week in Pittsburgh with Obama as Obama campaigned for both Casey and Harris:
Obama contrasts values of Harris, Trump at Pittsburgh rallywww.ncnewsonline.com
the 44th president, making his first campaign stop this fall in support of Harris, spoke of values and the contrast in presidential candidates after their different approaches to hurricane relief in the South. Trump at an event in Georgia accused Biden of ignoring the area, taking to social media to falsely accuse the administration of withholding and diverting funds from Republican areas.
"It's been one of the most disturbing things in this election season about Trump's rise in politics," he said. "How we have seemed to set aside the values that people like Dan stood for, (U.S. Sen.) Bob (Casey) stood for and that I was taught. Those used to be Democratic and Republican values. It used to be we would have arguments about tax policy or foreign policy, but we didn't have arguments about whether you should tell the truth or not. We didn't make excuses for people who violate basic norms for treating people fairly and with respect."
Obama spoke for about 45 minutes while U.S. Sen. Bob Casey sat behind him. Casey, running for a fourth term in the Senate, was one of the preceding speakers that also included quips by Gov. Josh Shapiro, Lt. Gov. Austin Davis and Pittsburgh Mayor Ed Gainey.
Cry harder.
#1 | Posted by deadman
Who's crying? I'm posting articles you don't like. More info about Polymarket has been coming out:
What We Know About the Mystery Trader Betting Big on a Trump Winwww.newsweek.com
A mysterious online trader is betting big on former President Donald Trump beating Vice President Kamala Harris in the presidential race.
Trump and Harris are locked in a tight race with less than three weeks until Election Day. Polls show the two candidates separated by only tiny margins in battleground states. But online betting markets, where individuals are putting millions of real dollars on the results of the presidential race, have broken toward Trump in recent days.
Polymarket, one of the leading political betting markets that is based offshore and partially funded by Peter Thiel, gave Trump about a 60 percent chance off winning the election as of Wednesday, while Harris had a 40 percent chance of victory. Betting odds have fluctuated throughout the election and may change based on current events and polls that could affect the outcome of the race.
But one trader has appeared to be influencing the market by betting millions of dollars on a Trump victory.
As of late Tuesday, the trader, only known as Fredi9999, has purchased more than 15 million shares, valued at $8.7 million, betting that Trump would win the election.
They have also purchased more than 3 million shares betting that Trump would win the popular vote, and nearly 1.5 million shares that Trump would carry Pennsylvania, a crucial battleground state that is viewed as the most likely tipping-point state this cycle. All told, Fredi9999's position is valued at more than $14 million on the platform.
Today in the WSJ:
A Mystery $30 Million Wave of Pro-Trump Bets Has Moved a Popular Prediction Marketwww.msn.com
Over the past two weeks, the chances of a Trump victory in the November election have surged on Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market. Its bettors were giving Trump a 60% chance of winning on Friday, while Harris's chances were 40%. The candidates were in a dead heat at the start of October.
Trump's gains on Polymarket have cheered his supporters, and they have been followed by the odds shifting in Trump's favor in other betting markets. Elon Musk flagged Trump's growing lead on Polymarket to his 200 million X followers on Oct. 6, praising the concept of betting markets. "More accurate than polls, as actual money is on the line," Musk posted.
But the surge might be a mirage manufactured by a group of four Polymarket accounts that have collectively pumped about $30 million of crypto into bets that Trump will win.
"There's strong reason to believe they are the same entity," said Miguel Morel, chief executive of Arkham Intelligence, a blockchain analysis firm that examined the accounts.
The big bets on Trump aren't necessarily nefarious. Some observers have suggested that they were simply placed by a large bettor convinced that Trump will win and looking for a big payday. Others, however, see the bets as an influence campaign designed to fuel social-media buzz for the former president.
Cry harder.
#1 | Posted by deadman
Who's crying? I'm posting articles you don't like. More info about Polymarket has been coming out:
What We Know About the Mystery Trader Betting Big on a Trump Winwww.newsweek.com
A mysterious online trader is betting big on former President Donald Trump beating Vice President Kamala Harris in the presidential race.
Trump and Harris are locked in a tight race with less than three weeks until Election Day. Polls show the two candidates separated by only tiny margins in battleground states. But online betting markets, where individuals are putting millions of real dollars on the results of the presidential race, have broken toward Trump in recent days.
Polymarket, one of the leading political betting markets that is based offshore and partially funded by Peter Thiel, gave Trump about a 60 percent chance off winning the election as of Wednesday, while Harris had a 40 percent chance of victory. Betting odds have fluctuated throughout the election and may change based on current events and polls that could affect the outcome of the race.
But one trader has appeared to be influencing the market by betting millions of dollars on a Trump victory.
As of late Tuesday, the trader, only known as Fredi9999, has purchased more than 15 million shares, valued at $8.7 million, betting that Trump would win the election.
They have also purchased more than 3 million shares betting that Trump would win the popular vote, and nearly 1.5 million shares that Trump would carry Pennsylvania, a crucial battleground state that is viewed as the most likely tipping-point state this cycle. All told, Fredi9999's position is valued at more than $14 million on the platform.
Today in the WSJ:
A Mystery $30 Million Wave of Pro-Trump Bets Has Moved a Popular Prediction Marketwww.msn.com
Over the past two weeks, the chances of a Trump victory in the November election have surged on Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market. Its bettors were giving Trump a 60% chance of winning on Friday, while Harris's chances were 40%. The candidates were in a dead heat at the start of October.
Trump's gains on Polymarket have cheered his supporters, and they have been followed by the odds shifting in Trump's favor in other betting markets. Elon Musk flagged Trump's growing lead on Polymarket to his 200 million X followers on Oct. 6, praising the concept of betting markets. "More accurate than polls, as actual money is on the line," Musk posted.
But the surge might be a mirage manufactured by a group of four Polymarket accounts that have collectively pumped about $30 million of crypto into bets that Trump will win.
"There's strong reason to believe they are the same entity," said Miguel Morel, chief executive of Arkham Intelligence, a blockchain analysis firm that examined the accounts.
The big bets on Trump aren't necessarily nefarious. Some observers have suggested that they were simply placed by a large bettor convinced that Trump will win and looking for a big payday. Others, however, see the bets as an influence campaign designed to fuel social-media buzz for the former president.
DonOLD Trump has a bad case of penis envy:
x.com