Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, October 17, 2024

In the presidential contest, Vice President Kamala Harris leads former President Donald Trump by five points among likely voters, including those who are undecided yet leaning toward a candidate. The race gets closer, however, among registered voters nationally. Here, three points separate the two candidates.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

We can just beat trump at the box (vote early, in person volunteer to canvas including by phone and talk friends into voting for harris)

#1 | Posted by Tor at 2024-10-16 01:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

...we also need to be sure trump supporters understand on every level he really did loose the election and they need to go back to having a trump free life.

#2 | Posted by Tor at 2024-10-16 01:59 PM | Reply

...we also need to be sure trump supporters understand on every level he really did loose the election and they need to go back to having a trump free life.

#3 | Posted by Tor at 2024-10-16 01:59 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The public polls are pure trash and even the liberals know that. They are meant to FORM public opinion rather than simply report on it. Internal polls show Kamala sinking quickly which is why she is on her disastrous press tour now and why the bettings odds have her getting crushed (betting odds are smart money from poll insiders).

It should become standard practice for all polls to be forced to state their error from their prior projection to actual results as a disclaimer on all their publications.

For instance, on this article, Marist would be forced to state *2020 error was D+5*

Similarly, garbage polls like Quinnipiac would need to state *2020 error was D+9*

With this actual discloser, they could no longer form opinion as their polls would be rightly rejected due to highly biased nature of their polling methodology.

Finally, in applying their error from 2020, we would then logically conclude that the true numbers are more like a tie at the national level which means Trump wins the EC easily. Dems need to win popular vote by 3-4% to win the EC.

#4 | Posted by deadman at 2024-10-16 10:09 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#4 | Posted by: deadman | Flag: Serious level

#5 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-16 10:10 PM | Reply

It's good that Harris leading in the popular vote but, as we all know, that isn't always enough. Where does she stand in the electoral vote?

#6 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-10-17 04:44 PM | Reply

The only ground that matters are the swing states.

And republicans got that covered.

#7 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-10-17 04:47 PM | Reply

"The only ground that matters are the swing states. And republicans got that covered." -

#7 | Posted by ClownShack

I call BS:

Close fight in the trenches: A look at the ground game in the presidential race: POLL

#8 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 05:13 PM | Reply

How nuch would Democrats need to win by to remove the most corrupt members of the Supreme Court?

#9 | Posted by danni at 2024-10-17 05:58 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

Good. Burn in hell Trump. Lose and go away.

#10 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-10-17 06:04 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

FACT: Once the winner has 3% or more of the total popular vote, it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#11 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:37 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#12 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#13 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#14 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#15 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#16 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#17 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#18 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#19 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#20 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#21 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#22 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#23 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#24 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#25 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#26 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#27 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#28 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#29 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#30 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#31 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#32 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#33 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#34 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#35 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#36 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#37 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#38 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#39 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#40 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#41 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#42 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#43 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#44 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#45 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#46 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:54 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#47 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#48 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#49 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#50 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#51 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#52 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#53 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#54 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#55 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#56 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#57 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#58 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#59 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#60 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#61 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#62 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#63 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#64 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#65 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#66 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#67 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#68 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#69 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#70 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#71 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#72 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#73 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#74 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#75 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#76 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#77 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#78 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#79 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#80 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#81 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#82 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#83 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#84 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#85 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#86 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#87 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#88 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#89 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#90 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#91 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#92 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#93 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#94 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#95 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#96 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#97 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#98 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#99 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#100 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#101 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#102 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#103 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#104 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#105 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#106 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#107 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#108 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#109 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#110 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#111 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#112 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#113 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#114 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#115 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#116 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#117 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#118 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#119 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#120 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#121 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#122 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#123 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#124 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#125 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#126 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#127 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#128 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#129 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#130 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#131 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#132 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#133 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#134 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#135 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#136 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#137 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#138 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#139 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#140 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#141 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#142 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#143 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#144 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#145 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#146 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#147 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#148 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#149 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#150 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#151 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#152 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#153 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#154 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#155 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#156 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#157 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#158 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#159 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#160 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#161 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#162 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#163 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#164 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#165 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#166 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#167 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#168 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#169 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#170 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#171 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#172 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#173 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#174 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#175 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#176 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#177 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#178 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#179 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#180 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#181 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#182 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#183 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#184 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#185 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#186 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#187 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#188 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#189 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#190 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#191 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#192 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#193 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#194 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#195 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#196 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#197 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#198 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#199 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#200 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#201 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#202 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#203 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#204 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#205 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#206 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#207 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#208 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#209 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#210 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#211 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#212 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#213 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#214 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#215 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#216 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#217 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#218 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#219 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#220 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#221 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#222 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#223 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#224 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#225 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#226 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#227 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#228 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#229 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#230 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#231 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#232 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#233 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#234 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#235 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#236 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#237 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#238 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#239 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#240 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#241 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#242 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#243 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#244 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#245 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#246 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#247 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#248 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#249 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#250 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#251 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#252 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#253 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#254 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#255 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#256 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#257 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#258 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#259 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#260 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#261 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#262 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#263 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#264 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#265 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#266 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#267 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#268 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#269 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#270 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#271 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#272 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#273 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#274 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#275 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#276 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#277 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#278 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#279 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#280 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#281 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#282 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#283 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#284 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#285 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#286 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#287 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#288 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#289 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#290 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#291 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#292 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#293 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#294 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#295 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#296 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#297 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#298 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#299 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#300 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#301 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#302 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#303 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#304 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#305 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#306 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#307 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#308 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#309 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#310 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#311 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#312 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#313 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#314 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#315 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#316 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#317 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#318 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#319 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#320 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#321 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#322 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#323 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#324 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#325 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#326 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#327 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#328 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#329 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#330 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#331 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#332 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#333 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#334 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#335 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#336 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#337 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#338 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#339 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#340 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#341 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#342 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#343 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#344 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#345 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#346 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#347 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#348 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#349 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#350 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#351 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#352 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#353 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#354 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#355 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#356 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#357 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#358 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#359 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#360 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#361 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#362 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#363 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#364 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#365 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#366 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#367 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#368 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#369 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#370 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#371 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#372 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#373 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#374 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#375 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#376 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#377 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#378 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#379 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#380 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#381 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#382 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#383 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#384 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#385 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#386 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#387 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#388 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#389 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#390 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#391 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#392 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#393 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#394 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#395 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#396 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#397 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#398 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#399 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#400 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#401 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#402 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#403 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#404 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#405 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#406 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#407 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#408 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#409 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#410 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#411 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#412 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#413 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#414 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#415 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#416 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#417 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#418 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#419 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#420 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#421 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#422 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#423 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#424 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#425 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#426 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#427 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#428 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#429 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#430 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#431 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#432 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#433 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#434 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#435 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#436 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#437 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#438 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#439 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#440 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#441 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#442 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#443 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#444 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#445 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#446 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#447 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#448 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#449 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#450 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#451 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#452 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#453 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#454 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#455 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#456 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#457 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#458 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#459 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#460 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#461 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#462 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#463 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#464 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#465 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#466 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#467 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#468 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#469 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#470 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#471 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#472 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#473 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#474 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#475 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#476 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#477 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#478 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#479 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#480 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#481 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#482 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#483 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#484 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#485 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#486 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#487 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#488 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#489 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#490 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#491 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#492 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#493 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#494 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#495 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#496 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#497 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#498 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#499 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#500 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#501 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#502 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#503 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#504 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#505 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#506 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#507 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#508 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#509 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#510 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#511 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#512 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#513 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#514 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#515 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#516 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#517 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#518 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#519 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#520 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#521 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#522 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#523 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#524 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#525 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#526 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#527 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#528 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#529 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#530 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#531 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#532 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#533 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#534 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#535 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#536 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#537 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#538 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#539 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#540 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#541 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#542 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#543 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#544 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#545 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#546 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#547 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#548 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#549 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#550 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#551 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#552 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#553 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#554 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#555 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#556 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#557 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#558 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#559 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#560 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#561 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#562 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#563 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#564 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#565 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#566 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#567 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#568 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#569 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#570 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#571 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#572 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#573 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#574 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#575 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#576 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#577 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#578 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#579 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#580 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#581 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#582 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#583 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#584 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#585 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#586 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#587 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#588 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#589 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#590 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#591 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#592 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#593 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#594 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#595 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#596 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#597 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#598 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#599 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#600 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#601 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#602 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#603 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#604 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#605 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#606 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#607 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#608 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#609 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#610 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#611 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#612 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#613 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#614 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#615 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#616 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#617 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#618 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#619 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#620 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#621 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#622 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#623 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#624 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#625 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#626 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#627 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#628 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#629 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#630 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#631 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#632 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#633 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#634 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#635 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#636 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#637 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#638 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#639 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#640 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#641 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#642 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#643 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#644 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#645 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#646 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#647 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#648 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#649 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#650 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#651 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#652 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#653 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#654 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#655 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#656 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#657 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#658 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:55 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#659 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#660 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#661 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#662 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#663 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#664 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#665 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#666 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#667 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#668 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#669 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#670 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#671 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#672 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#673 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#674 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#675 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#676 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#677 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#678 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#679 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#680 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#681 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#682 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#683 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#684 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#685 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#686 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#687 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#688 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#689 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#690 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#691 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#692 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#693 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#694 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#695 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#696 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#697 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#698 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#699 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#700 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#701 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#702 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#703 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#704 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#705 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#706 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#707 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#708 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#709 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#710 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#711 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#712 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#713 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#714 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#715 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#716 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#717 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#718 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#719 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#720 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#721 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#722 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#723 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#724 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#725 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#726 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#727 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#728 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#729 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#730 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#731 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#732 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#733 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#734 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#735 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#736 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#737 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#738 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#739 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#740 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#741 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#742 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#743 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#744 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#745 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#746 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#747 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#748 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#749 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Because YOYOW, an update to my #11:

FACT: Once the winner has a 3% or more advantage in the total popular vote (over the loser's total popular vote total), it is mathematically impossible for the loser to get 270 (or more) Electoral Votes.

#750 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-17 06:56 PM | Reply

Read Comments 1 - 750 | 751 - 1036

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort