I thought his lack of foreign intervention was a main selling point ...

More blood on the hands on the Biden/Harris admin.

#9 | POSTED BY GRACIEAMAZED

I suspect this will be a common refrain from this hag while her preferred politician f^*%s everything up seven ways from Sunday.

Think of the money he'll save now.

#6 | POSTED BY FORTFISHER

Hey s$&*bag, GFY.

Oh f*&^ dips&^%. If you have to lie, you've already lost.

How many times does Trump have to be Trump before these idiots get it?

Yet they get upset when they're called stupid...

#7 | Posted by BellRinger

Fair enough.

Calling PBS biased is absurd.

I stopped listening to NPR years ago because I got tired of the bulls*&^ they offer as "programming."

The only people who thought it would be different are the same idiots who thought he would actually lower prices.

And I think we've sufficiently established that they're pretty fracking stupid.

This is the kind of classless bulls*&^ that makes MAGA so reprehensible.

I wonder when the investigations of OAN and The Daily Wire ect will begin...

They're far more biased than anything righties whine about on a regular basis.

A criminal POTUS with a criminal base.

You unpatriotic, treasonous election denier.

#31 | Posted by fishpaw

GFY s&^*bag.

I actually agree with this.

Although, acting as if the GOP is the party of the people and not the wealthy is laughable. They're just better, more shameless liars.

The Dems, however, seem hellbent on continuing to fail, though. I read today that David Hogue is being pushed as a vice chair in the DNC. They seem to want to double down on their losing strategies.

I, for one, am shocked that posters like ballwasher haven't commented here yet regarding the governing by EO approach Trump is taking.

AHhhhh who am I kidding? Any time a righty mentions the Constitution, it's a shallow attempt to win an argument, not a genuine concern for our constitutional republic.

You are an anti-American D-bag and you deserve to have your America hating views repudiated.

#28 | Posted by BellRinger

You don't get to be a slobbering Trumper for years then throw this accusation around.

I hope I'm around when you finally realize you're a gutes Deutsch.

Lefties crying that human traffickers are being removed makes the detractors look kind ridiculous.

The only thing that looks ridiculous is ballwasher's mischaracterization of the topic.

I've yet to see a single post doing what you state above. I'm reading plenty of posts expressing concern over what this means overall for US enforcement policy and the very real concern of citizens being caught up in this.

The latter being something that should horrify "constitutional c-c-conservatives," but has so far garnered a half hearted *shrug*.

What does that mean, exactly? People who have committed actual crimes? Not merely being here illegally?

#13 | Posted by eberly

It means whatever they want it to mean.

It's clear they're "governing" on extraordinary powers meant for extraordinary conditions ("emergencies"), this is just the next step in that.

The American people should not be forced to sacrifice choice and affordability when purchasing a new car,

LOL prices won't go down one bit because of this.

But people will now have to fill up more often, making more money for energy companies (is that where this guy comes from?).

Yet another way this administration will increase costs for the average person.

your link that was "so easy to find"

has no examples, only reports of the fear of them.

#31 | Posted by kwrx25

Let me look for the link I was reading. That wasn't the right one.

It will go on for years. Americans will be caught up in it; many, many. MAGA will say so what?

Likely part of the calculus. Normalize sending citizens to places like Gitmo and when additional political prisoner camps get built it won't be a concern.

The only way politics should come into this is how it caused the degradation of our public health institutions to the point that this was able to happen.

If this isn't dealt with and squashed, it's a harbinger of what is to come as we slip to failed state status.

THAT is the primary motivation for this.

#30 | Posted by truthhurts

I suspect each of the EOs that are blatantly unconstitutional are intentionally so to force a SCOTUS review without waiting for the usual winding through the judiciary.

They're targeted strikes on constraints to executive power.

THIS IS EMBARRASSING.

#26 | Posted by Alexandrite

It's just leveraging a manicured scapegoat/excuse to drop a bomb and cause chaos.

If reduced spending was their actual goal, the EO would say to review spending and make recommendations to OBM for what can be cut based on the preferred policy statements.

The blanket cutting of all government funding across the board is intentionally painful by being purposefully heavy handed.

What you think you voted for and what you got are two very very different things.

#12 | Posted by donnerboy

Yup, they think they voted for change for other people. Their expectations are they will suffer little to no change.

Then again, they're gullible enough to believe Trump soooooo...

Except he's doing it by EO and little care for consequences. It's always easier to break something than to build it.

Fishpaw is an unAmerican piece of s^*%.