Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

miranda7

Subscribe to miranda7's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Comments

"Where is my job to defend stuff other people have said?"
Are you drunk or just stupid?
Lets try this again

I said "Now be a dear and show me where it says teachers can be arrested for not hiding their books. Or for displaying rainbow, or pictures of their spouses. Or the part where it will "erase" gays. Or where it says you can't say Gay."
and you said "Go read it. it answers some of your questions to me."
and I said "No it doesn't, because the answer to all of my questions to you is NOWHERE, NOWHERE DOES THE LAW SAY ANY OF THOSE THINGS."
and you said "Wow, I never realized how dishonest you were until this moment."

Then proceeded to attach a bunch of clips that did not come from the law

And I said, "Wow, I never realized how dishonest YOU are. I will ask you again, WHERE in the LAW does it say any of that? It does not say any of that. Wherever you clipped that from (the article perhaps?) it is not accurate. That is my whole point. The news media is publishing misinformation and outright lies about the new laws

and you said "Where is my job to defend stuff other people have said?"

I think you need to pull up your big girl pants and admit you were wrong, but your won't because you just aren't intellectually honest.

Now, what part is inaccurate that I clipped ? Almost all of it. Im not going to waste my time with point counterpoint. The article is filled with inaccuracies, which I told you in the first place before you decided to quote it to call me a liar. If you would just read the law, you could see that for myself, but I don't take you as a person who is interested in truth.

I said the
Its not, but it is your job to defend calling me dishonest. Why don't you show me where I was dishonest?

Are you a

I never said any of those things.

#40 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2023-02-02 01:17 AM | Reply | Flag:

What part is inaccurate that I clipped?

Be specific. Show your work.

(I'm sorry I caught you not reading the article and making a damn fool of yourself)

#41 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2023-02-02 01:19 AM | Reply | Flag:

Well there you go! I didn't read the article o at the top of the page, I clicked on the CNN link, but hey, thanks for sharing. Only thing is that is NOT the bill that was signed into law, that is an earlier draft.

Here is the final cut of the actual law. The pertinent (changed parts) are 8(c)1-8

www.leg.state.fl.us

Now be a dear and show me where it says teachers can be arrested for not hiding their books. Or for displaying rainbow, or pictures of their spouses. Or the part where it will "erase" gays. Or where it says you can't say Gay.

"@#63 ... there is massive pushback against any effort to better secure absentee ballots. That is a hugely vulnerable area for mass exploitation. ...
How? Please be specific."

Being specific would be providing a blueprint, I'm not going to do that. If you prefer to pretend absentee ballots are safe from exploitation, you may continue to believe that. I can't/won't prove it to you over a public message board.

"Indeed, you even to seem to admit that you know of an election fraud channel, yet you admit you do not report it to election officials." They know. Lots of people know. Pretty much anyone who has ever worked in an elections office or on a campaign knows, and its not just a localized issue.

"Given that, why should anything you say about election fraud be taken seriously? Your comments seems to indicate you do no want to prevent it."

I could say the same about you. What have you done for election security, other than deny the need for it?

"What has been damaging to the public confidence in voting has been the Republicans' constant assertion 9without evidence) of voting fraud. Why do you want to continue that assertion?"

What Republican assertion have I continued? Be specific.

"The Republicans have already severely damaged public confidence in voting with their unsubstantiated assertions. And you are continuing to try to do so.
Yes they have damaged public confidence. I thought we agreed we were on the same page about that too? How have I continued trying to do so? Be specific.
I am trying to PROTECT public confidence by PREVENTING a major incident of voter fraud. We may not agree on the best way to accomplish that, but I don't know why you can't see that. AT this point I think you are just ------- with me.

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2023 World Readable