But Newsom has a problem: He has been a California politician for decades, and has held the state's governorship since 2019. During his tenure, the state has been a laboratory for some of the Democratic Party's most politically fraught policies and instincts, which has left it less affordable and more culturally radical than it used to be. His record not only raises pressing questions about how effectively he could govern as president; it also provides opponents an endless buffet of vulnerabilities across social and economic issues. read more
Scott Adams, creator of the "Dilbert" comic strip, who became controversial for his right-wing statements, has died ... read more
Alberta's election agency announced Monday it has approved a proposed referendum question on the province separating from Canada. The question seeks a yes or no answer to: "Do you agree that the province of Alberta should cease to be a part of Canada to become an independent state?" Elections Alberta says the proponent " the Alberta Prosperity Project and its chief executive officer, Mitch Sylvestre " have until early January to appoint a financial officer for its petition campaign, after which signature collection can begin. read more
Sergey Brin is joining his Google co-founder, Larry Page, in reducing ties to the state where they built their fortunes. read more
The United Arab Emirates has restricted funding for its citizens who want to study at British universities, the latest sign of tensions over the UK's decision not to proscribe the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood group. Abu Dhabi's decision to exclude UK institutions from a list of universities eligible for state scholarships comes as relations between the two historic allies have frayed in recent years. In June, the UAE higher education ministry published a list of global universities for which scholarships would be approved and qualifications certified, as part of reforms that limited funding to the best-performing institutions. read more
No. Nixon fought against that right up until he realized he did not have the power to veto it. Fail try again.
#41 | POSTED BY WILDMAN62
Hey A_MORON you going to follow WildMan5 around now?
In early 1970, as a result of heightened public concerns about deteriorating city air, natural areas littered with debris, and urban water supplies contaminated with dangerous impurities, President Richard Nixon presented the House and Senate a groundbreaking 37-point message on the environment.
Following the council's recommendations, the president sent to Congress a plan to consolidate many environmental responsibilities of the federal government under one agency, a new Environmental Protection Agency. This reorganization would permit response to environmental problems in a manner beyond the previous capability of government pollution control programs:
www.epa.gov
LOL WildMan just pulling ---- out of of his ---.
Interesting ...
The AGs of DC, IL, CT, DE, HI, MD, MA, MI, MN, NV, NJ, NY, OR, PA, RI, VT, and WA argued in 2024 that there's no 2A right to carry guns at "events involving political speech, like political rallies and protests" because they are "often targets of violence"
storage.courtlistener.com
You're killing Americans now. You can drop the "illegals" charade.
#404 | POSTED BY HORSTNGRABEN
By that logic you're killing more Americans than LE can ever hope too.
Local law enforcement has jurisdiction, not the Feds.
#275 | Posted by BellRinger
This is incorrect.
Would these "administrative" warrants hold up before the supreme court?
~ Galaxy
Probably ...
Interesting tidbit, since immigration/removal is a civil proceeding, the FifthAmendement doesn't apply.
supreme.justia.com
Second, although in a criminal procedure, the court must instruct the jury that it cannot draw an inference of guilt from a defendant's failure to testify about facts relevant to his case, Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), in civil cases, "the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976).
www.litigationandtrial.com(1923)).
If you're a here legally speak up, silence can be admission of guilt, carry and show your ID, while you don't have to carry one an officer can detain you until your ID is established.
The FBI has nothing better to do.
They went after people that prayed at an abortion clinic, and you said nothing.
#42 - great summary and explanation, Wildman. Thanks.
#43 | POSTED BY LYINYAV
Considering his record, he lies more than you.