Republicans Handed Legal Loss in Battleground State

OK, found this...

... If you are a registered voter but your eligibility to vote at your polling place is uncertain, you have the right to vote a provisional ballot.

What is a provisional ballot?

Sometimes county elections officials need more time to determine a voter's eligibility to vote. Election officials may ask that voter to vote a provisional ballot. A provisional ballot records your vote while the county board of elections determines whether it can be counted.

You may be issued a provisional ballot for the reasons below:

- - - Your name was not in the poll book or supplemental poll book.
- - - - - - For example, you reported to the wrong precinct; or
- - - - - - You did not report a recent change in residence to the county election office.

- - - You are required to show ID, but cannot show ID.

- - - Your eligibility was challenged by an election official.

- - - You were issued an absentee or mail-in ballot but believe you did not successfully vote that ballot, and you do not surrender your ballot and outer return envelope at the polling place to be spoiled.

- - - You returned a completed absentee or mailin ballot that was rejected, or you believe will be rejected, by the county board of elections and you believe you are eligible to vote.

- - - There is a special court order with respect to your registration status.

- - - There is a special court order related to extending the hours of voting.

- - - You believe that you are registered in a political party, but your voter record indicates otherwise (for primary elections only).

The GOP has to cheat to win.

If your vote is rejected and you are give a provisional ballot be aware that provisional ballot must be cured within a few days of the vote or else it is tossed out. Just casting the provisional ballot is not enough. You need to follow up with the local elections office and perfect your ballot if you want it to count.

The GOP wrongly kick people off the voter rolls KNOWING that they will cast the provisional ballot and not follow up to perfect it.

Just another dirty underhanded trick the GOP pulls.

Democrats pave the way to steal another election. Why do Democrats fight against election security and integrity?

#6 | Posted by visitor_ at 2024-10-26 09:16 AM | Reply | Flag: Happy Anniversary ! ! !

Why do Democrats fight against election security and integrity?

Visiturd, the daughter-boning orange pedo wanted to create a cyber security unit with Putin.

www.reuters.com

#8 | Posted by reinheitsgebot

I just flagged your post Newsworthy.

It was done for two reasons: It was Newsworthy, and to help give it more visibility here on the Retort.

It wasn't done to "butter you up," as claimed by JeffJ.

#StrongerTogether #Indivisible

and biden judge in VA says put illegals back on rolls.

watching for bus loads and plane loads of illegals heading to VA.

who's the "threat to democracy" again ?

---#demsrgodamnliars....

#10 | Posted by shrimptacodan | Flag: (CHOOSE)

So Biden judge says put illegals back on the voter rolls! Democrats are forcing real citizens to clearly understand Dems are on a trajectory against truth and our country, and want to take what is yours. Their mission apparently is election corruption and theft of your nation.

#10 I tried to give you the Newsworthy recognition award you deserve but strangley it was never awarded. Hopefully not but perhaps it is restricted to only Dems. Like I said hopefully not. But Ive seen it before.

#13 | Posted by robson at 2024-10-27 08:54 PM | Reply | Flag: A proud Russian bot since 2006 (perhaps)

The reality is, you support a candidate that wants to force women to give birth to a child with Potter sequence, forcing that mother to hold her cold, blue child for the first (and only) 90 minutes of its life, suffocating to death in her mother's arms, while there's nothing that the mother or medical science to do to offer that poor child comfort.

Instead, she has to suffocate to death in her mother's arms for her only 90 minutes in life.

That's you, and the rest of your ilk who think that America is a garbage can.

@#12 ... So Biden judge says ...

From the summary...

... The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Wednesday ...

How is the Pennsylvania Supreme court "a Biden judge?"

#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-27 09:14 PM

I exaggerate to illustrate.

@#16 ... I exaggerate to illustrate...

Illustrate what?

That the comment you posted has nothing of substance?

I would disagree with that.

But if that is where you want to go, then have at it.

#17 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-27 09:26 PM

I exaggerate to illustrate.

How to not look like a complete moron while posting on the Retort

"Illustrate what?" -

#17 | Posted by LampLighter

Your obnoxious posting style, which is your cry for attention.

People here and directly to me have reiterated this:

Your posting style demonstrates a complete disrespect for readers of this site.

You're no different than the posts from shrimptacodan.

And you bring shame to intelligent readers with your willful disrespect.

You're welcome.

@#20

Thank-you for your opinion.

And I respectfully disagree.

So now, can you move past my posting style and be more interested in the content I post, not the style in which I post it?

thx.

"So now, can you move past my posting style..."

#21 | Posted by LampLighter

As long as you purposefully disrespect readers here, and besmirch those of us who are genuinely interested in pulling together to support and elect Kamala Harris?

Nope.

You're welcome.

My recommendation is for Hans and lamp to plonk each other

sounds like a good idea.

#23 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-10-27 09:55 PM

On a site like the Retort, plonking is ridiculous.

What's fun about plonking here on the Retort:

Yeah, you can no longer see the plonked person's posts.

But they can still see yours...

Which means that you can't see the plonked person's reply.

So I never plonk. It goes against my grain.

Fun, indeed.

That is why I called for mutuallly assured plonking

The retort will be better for it

"That is why I called for mutuallly assured plonking" -

#26 | Posted by truthhurts

You're 100% correct, truthhurts.

That levels the playing ground.

As on the Twitter machine.

@#23 ... My recommendation is for Hans and lamp to plonk each other ...

I don't plonk anyone here.

I want to read and understand all the comments posted, not just those I agree with.

#28 | Posted by LampLighter | Flag: Posts exactly like shrimptacodan

@#26 ... The retort will be better for it ...

Oddly, just popped up on a playlist here ...

New Model Army - White Coats (1989)
www.youtube.com

Lyrics excerpt ...
genius.com

...
Well, we know what makes the flowers grow, but we don't know why
And we all have the knowledge of DNA, but we still die
We perch so thin and fragile here upon the land
And the earth that moves beneath us, we don't understand
...

#30 | Posted by LampLighter | Flag: Posts exactly like shrimptacodan

Some people find Lamp's posting format annoying.

Some people find shrimptacodan's posting format annoying.

Some people find Hans' posting format annoying.

Some people find Tony's posting format annoying.

Some people find my posting format annoying.

You get the picture.

#32 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday

Gal, I believe you recently asked if I was looking to be a "big fish in a small pond."

Nope.

I'm hoping that those of us who are not political remoras are at least swimming in the same direction, heading towards the same goal, and are willing to show such solidarity with one another through action, deed and word.

Apparently, that's not the case with some of us on the left side of the aisle.

In fact, some of us on the left side of the aisle have been called enemies by those who were, ostensibly, on the same side.

*sigh*

@#32 ... You get the picture. ...

The picture I "get" is that I try to look at the content, not the format of that comment.

Posted by LampLighter | Flag: Posts exactly like shrimptacodan *

* - (Posts like "bushlover2/afkabl2/"babbles" who, at his advanced age, finally earned his GED!!!)

@#33 ... In fact, some of us on the left side of the aisle have been called enemies by those who were, ostensibly, on the same side. ...

It's a big tent here over on the left.

Maybe, learn to deal with differing expressed opinions.

Discuss rather than ostracize.

Posted by LampLighter | Flag: Posts exactly like shrimptacodan *

* - (Posts like "bushlover2/afkabl2/"babbles" who, at his advanced age, finally earned his GED!!!)

Has no idea of the concept of respect for the reader.

You get the picture.

#32 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday

No one finds my posting style annoying.

Cause I am perfect.

Thanks for recognizing such

Posted by LampLighter | Flag: Posts exactly like shrimptacodan *

* - (Posts like "bushlover2/afkabl2/"babbles" who, at his advanced age, finally earned his GED!!!)

You're the one who called me the enemy.

Own your own words.

It appears that the Israeli-Palestinian question will be easier to solve than the Hans-Lamp conundrum.

Hans, I thought you were the Drudge Historian, not the Drudge formatting police. If I don't like the formatitng someone uses and don't want to plonk them, something I have never done either, I just scroll on by. And that's what I recommned people do with my posts as well if they don't want to plonk me. I don't know why you are making such a big deal out of this. Yes, I sometimes find Lamp's and Shrimp's formatting annoying just as I sometimes find your formatting annoying, and if I'm not in the mood to deal with it, I just scroll on by. I'm less likely to find Tony's formatting annoying because we suffer from the same formatting flaw according to some aka over use of blockquotes.

Gal, I believe you recently asked if I was looking to be a "big fish in a small pond."
Nope.

No, that wasn't me. I think it was Twin.

#38 | Posted by truthhurts

Hells bells, don't even get me started on your formatting style. :-)

@#39 ... You're the one who called me the enemy.

Own your own words. ...

Please provide that exact quote.

I do remember saying a "wolf in sheep's clothing" which, fwiw, seems to have been confirmed.

But "enemy?"

If I had said that, I do apologize.

But I have to ask, got a link?

(you had to know that was coming...)

@#40 ... It appears that the Israeli-Palestinian question will be easier to solve than the Hans-Lamp conundrum. ...

Stay tuned ...

Mel Blanc & The Sportsmen - Woody Woodpecker Song (1948)
www.youtube.com

An interesting playlist here this evening.

" I thought you were the Drudge Historian, not the Drudge formatting police."

Gal, I'm just looking for those of us on the left side of the aisle to respect the readers of this site.

LumberLiquidator posts exactly like shrimptacodan, who disrespects readers with his every, single post, and represents Trumpanziees.

LL does the exact same thing with this...

I'm just asking LL to not disrespect readers with such ridiculous gaps...

Which demonstrates complete disrespect for the reader...

..and paints us all with the same brush, disrespectful brush.