Friday, May 16, 2025

Conservatives block Trump's Big Tax Breaks Bill in a Stunning Setback

In a setback, House Republicans failed Friday to push their big package of tax breaks ...

More

This week at CBPP, we focused on the impacts of the House Republican reconciliation plan. www.cbpp.org/blog/in-case ...

[image or embed]

-- Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (@centeronbudget.bsky.social) May 16, 2025 at 1:40 PM

Comments

... insisting on steeper spending cuts to Medicaid ...

Billionaires trying to fund their tax cuts by denying health care to the working poor.

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-05-16 03:10 PM

"In their quest for deeper reductions, the conservatives are particularly eyeing Medicaid, the health care program for some 70 million Americans. They want new work requirements for aid recipients to start immediately, rather than on Jan. 1, 2029, as the package proposes.

Democrats emphasized that millions of people would lose their health coverage and food stamps assistance if the bill passes while the wealthiest Americans would reap enormous tax cuts. They also said it would increase future deficits.

"That is bad economics. It is unconscionable," said Rep. Brendan Boyle, the top Democratic lawmaker on the panel."

''

NOT Enough Pain! say the rwingers. The Oligarchs need to FEEL the suffering of the People!

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-16 03:13 PM

rather than on Jan. 1, 2029, as the package proposes.

It's amazing how many poison pills are being packed into this bill. It seems like every policy I see discussed/analyzed has some sort of provision for expiration right when a new administration would take over.

#3 | Posted by jpw at 2025-05-16 04:15 PM

@#3 ... some sort of provision for expiration right when a new administration would take over ...

Looking at it a little differently ...

The bills seem to have provisions to boost the economy leading up to the 2028 election, and expiring just after that.


#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-05-16 04:17 PM

Just how corrupt has the GOP become? I mean it took something so monstrously ridiculous as this new spending bill to FINALLY get a couple of them to grow a conscience and get off their butts to vote against. Unbelievable. Now lets wait and watch to see what Unconstitutional maneuvers the MAGAs will not attempt in order to unlawfully bypass Congress and pay off all those oligarchs just like they promised.

#5 | Posted by moder8 at 2025-05-16 05:12 PM

Those GOP ghouls that voted against it did so because it wasn't horrid enough

#6 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-05-16 05:14 PM

Hamburglar: That is true. They were squaring off against Blue State Republican reps who knew their careers were doomed if they went as far as the extremist right is demanding.

#7 | Posted by moder8 at 2025-05-16 05:25 PM

Hahaha it was fiscal conservatives who said No Way Jose.

You can't make this Stuff up.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-16 10:09 PM

8647!

#9 | Posted by moder8 at 2025-05-16 11:37 PM

8647 is a prime number therefore it's our prime objective to get rid of Trump. The legal way.

#10 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-16 11:41 PM

@#6 ... Those GOP ghouls that voted against it did so because it wasn't horrid enough ...

That seems to be a rather concise, and apropos, summary.

#11 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-05-17 12:17 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

End of Rule of Law in America (70 comments)

James Comey's Instagram Post Sparks Federal Investigation (69 comments)

Moody Downgrades U.S. Credit Rating (33 comments)

DHS Considering Migrant Reality Show (30 comments)

The Art of the Cave (30 comments)

Perks Now, Pain Later (22 comments)

Supreme Court Extends Blocks on Trump Admin's Alien Enemy Act Removals (20 comments)

An Afrikaner Farming Family Trades South Africa for Alabama (20 comments)

Walmart to Raise Prices Within Weeks (20 comments)

Bondi Dumped $1 Million Trump Media Shares on Liberation Day (19 comments)