Bibi: Hamas Leader Sinwar Likely Killed in Hospital Tunnel

#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS

Good stuff man! Remember when you posted that article about the hospital attack, trying to make it look like Israel was targeting a hospital for the sake of killing Palestinian civilians. Instead of being a precision attack aimed at the war criminal Palestinians using a hospital full of civilians to shield a military target?

Israel Celebrates Holiday By Killing 60 Palestinians

As if Israelis have adopted the civilian -murdering ethos of the Palestians.

I look forward to your next pro-Hamas propoganda post. Maybe try to get better talking points from your Hamas handlers.

I'm on neither side, but I generally root for an underdog when there is no moral side.
#9 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

Well, one of those sides lets 25% of their population who practice a different religion than the majority exist in peace with full rights of citizenship, and more rights than they would enjoy anywhere else in the Arab world.

The other would have no qualms, if left to their own devices, about eliminating every infidel that they could lay their hands on. Including many of the Useful Idiots who march in protests for that side.

Personally, I root for the folks who are less likely to force their religion upon me and murder me and my family while shouting "Aloha Snackbar!" with all their might. But I'm funny that way. Count me on Team-Not ISIS.

It's not muslims who have made america unrecognizable from how it was pre fox news.
#13 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

How soon they forget:
Putin's fingerprints are all over the Hamas attack
October 12, 2023, thehill.com

Muslims For Trump: We Were A Deciding Factor
November 7, 2024, indiawest.com

Biden says Hamas backing away' from hostage-ceasefire deal
August 20, 2024, www.timesofisrael.com

The terms of this new agreement are not that different from eight months ago
January 17, 2025, www.abc.net.au

The Palestinians' attack was timed about a year before the election to get maximum effect before voters cast their ballots. Notice how the useful idiots stopped their pro-Hamas protests on campuses, highways, bridges, airports, etc. after Trump won? The election that Muslims bragged about helping him win. I guess Palestine must be free, since barely a peep can be heard nowadays.

Putin must laugh himself to sleep on how easy Americans are to manipulate, as he suppresses the vote election after election.

Buttery Males, Free Palestine. It's all the same nonsense that means nothing, changes nothing, but steals elections from Dems to hand power to the GOP.

Which points to the fact that the REAL issue is RUSSIA not hamas.
#15 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

It can be both.

Hamas had their own objectives that complemented Russia and Iran's goals. Hamas wouldn't have pulled the trigger on October 7th without Russia/Iran's orders/permission, but that doesn't relieve the Pro-Hamas Muslims of their own responsibility for the natural results of their actions.

And if you don't think they'll go for a repeat next chance they get to hold sway over a Dem in power, I certainly won't be able to convince you otherwise. But they will, and it will cost the Dems either way they come out on it, for being too hard on the Palestinians (by the small but vocal pro-Hamas community), or for being terrorist sympathizers (by the vast majority of Americans that are anti-Hamas/Muslim).

Lots of people responsible for the election results, from pro-Trans insisting on biological males participating in women's sport and alienating the majority of Americans, to pro-Hamas and Muslims making Dems look like useless idiots.

I blame them all, just like Jill Stein/Ralph Nader voters don't get off scot-free because they are easily-duped fools taken advantage of by others.

And that's not even getting into the fact of what the Muslims would do to me, my nation, and those I care about if they were free to enact their policies like they have in other countries where they hold control. Best of luck being an atheist, talking religion, letting your woman drive/hold a job, dress how they choose, etc. in many of those nations.

Here's an example:
Sharia in the USA: Christians Jailed for Preaching to Muslims - Dearborn, MI Officials Sued
Sharia law makes it a crime to preach the Gospel to Muslims.
www.thomasmore.org

Is there more to the story? Probably, but I have no doubt that some devout Muslims can be problematic to the American way of life if they had the opportunity.

Oh, and here's a link discussing the dismissal of that case by Dearborn, Michigan and link to its apology for attempting to enforce sharia in the United States: en.wikipedia.org

I care about the religious extremists that have seized control of MY country, not the religious extremists who have been screwing up the desert on the other side of the world for thousands of years.
#19 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

Fair enough. But this discussion started with you saying:

I'm on neither side, but I generally root for an underdog when there is no moral side.
#9 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

Morally speaking, I know which one side is clearly more troubling for me. You differ.

And then you said:

It's not muslims who have made america unrecognizable from how it was pre fox news.
#13 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

The Muslims helped cost Dems the election by throw in with the other set of extremists. And would do it again. In the process helping making our nation unrecognizable.

Not caring about the extremists on the other side of the world is good way of coming across as sympathizing with terrorists, which will likely cost Dems elections. So Dems need to figure out how to thread that needle, since the party is a herd of cats while Republicans come across as strong and united.

Personally, I think that Dems calling it how it is and publicly hammering on Palestinian war crimes would be a good way of threading that needle, since it would show them to be rational, resolute, and effective leaders. Instead of just ineffectual, clueless idiots.