Which points to the fact that the REAL issue is RUSSIA not hamas.
#15 | Posted by SpeakSoftly
It can be both.
Hamas had their own objectives that complemented Russia and Iran's goals. Hamas wouldn't have pulled the trigger on October 7th without Russia/Iran's orders/permission, but that doesn't relieve the Pro-Hamas Muslims of their own responsibility for the natural results of their actions.
And if you don't think they'll go for a repeat next chance they get to hold sway over a Dem in power, I certainly won't be able to convince you otherwise. But they will, and it will cost the Dems either way they come out on it, for being too hard on the Palestinians (by the small but vocal pro-Hamas community), or for being terrorist sympathizers (by the vast majority of Americans that are anti-Hamas/Muslim).
Lots of people responsible for the election results, from pro-Trans insisting on biological males participating in women's sport and alienating the majority of Americans, to pro-Hamas and Muslims making Dems look like useless idiots.
I blame them all, just like Jill Stein/Ralph Nader voters don't get off scot-free because they are easily-duped fools taken advantage of by others.
And that's not even getting into the fact of what the Muslims would do to me, my nation, and those I care about if they were free to enact their policies like they have in other countries where they hold control. Best of luck being an atheist, talking religion, letting your woman drive/hold a job, dress how they choose, etc. in many of those nations.
Here's an example:
Sharia in the USA: Christians Jailed for Preaching to Muslims - Dearborn, MI Officials Sued
Sharia law makes it a crime to preach the Gospel to Muslims.
www.thomasmore.org
Is there more to the story? Probably, but I have no doubt that some devout Muslims can be problematic to the American way of life if they had the opportunity.
